AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 vs Intel Core i7-14700 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 and Intel Core i7-14700 represent two distinct approaches to processing power, one optimized for mobile efficiency and the other for desktop performance. Across the recorded benchmark suite, the Intel Core i7-14700 secures a decisive victory in every single test, leaving the AMD part with a win count of zero against Intel's eleven. The data indicates a fundamental performance gap driven by core count and power envelope, though the AMD processor's strengths lie in its compact footprint and integrated feature set.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most significant margin of victory for the Intel Core i7-14700 appears in floating point math, where it scores 106,716 against the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440's 42,934, a delta of -59.8%. This nearly 60% advantage indicates a substantial lead in workloads that rely heavily on parallel floating-point calculations, such as scientific simulations and certain rendering tasks.

Integer math follows a similar pattern, with Intel delivering 154,535 points versus AMD's 65,991, a -57.3% delta. This metric is critical for general productivity applications, database operations, and coding, where the Intel part shows a commanding lead. The data encryption test also heavily favors Intel, with a score of 29,601 compared to 12,418, marking a -58% difference, which suggests faster handling of secure data transactions and cryptographic workloads.

The multithreaded performance gap is substantial, though slightly less extreme. The Intel Core i7-14700 records 40,318 in the PassMark multithread test, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 manages 21,054, a -47.8% delta. This near-halving of performance in heavily threaded applications is consistent with the core count disparity between the two processors. The physics test tells a similar story: Intel scores 2,226 against AMD's 1,119, a -49.7% difference, indicating better performance in physics simulations and gaming workloads that utilize multiple cores.

For data compression, the Intel part achieves 498,198 points, while the AMD processor records 256,420, a -48.5% delta. Random string sorting shows Intel at 54,340 versus AMD's 27,252, a -49.8% difference, highlighting Intel's advantage in memory-intensive sorting operations. Extended instruction sets, which leverage modern CPU features like AVX, show Intel ahead with 28,388 points against AMD's 18,456, a -35% delta.

The prime number finding test, often a measure of raw integer processing capability, gives Intel 164 points versus AMD's 77, a -53% delta. The closest margin comes in single-threaded performance: Intel scores 4,236 against AMD's 3,785, a -10.6% delta. While still a win for Intel, this smaller gap suggests that the AMD Zen 5 architecture offers competitive per-core performance, even if it cannot overcome the Intel part's overall core advantage.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700 records an average benchmark score of 52,301, compared to the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440's 41,208. This places Intel in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while AMD sits in the 87th percentile.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD processor's nearest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H with an average score of 41,215, showing a 0% delta. It also trades closely with the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H at 41,263 (-0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X at 41,376 (-0.4%), and the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H at 40,967 (0.6%).

Q: What is the single-threaded performance difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700 scores 4,236 in the PassMark single-thread test, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 scores 3,785. This represents a -10.6% delta, meaning Intel is roughly 10.6% faster in single-threaded workloads.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700 features 33 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has 8 MB of L3 cache. The larger cache on the Intel part can benefit workloads that repeatedly access a sizable dataset.

Q: Does the AMD processor support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i7-14700 also supports ECC memory, so this feature is present on both processors.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Core i7-14700 has a TDP of 65 watts. This indicates that the AMD processor is designed for a much lower power envelope, typical of mobile platforms.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous for performance. The Intel Core i7-14700 wins all eleven head-to-head benchmark comparisons, including a -58% delta in data encryption and a -59.8% delta in floating point math. For any workload where raw throughput is the primary criterion, the Intel part is the superior choice based on recorded measurements. Its 91st percentile ranking versus AMD's 87th percentile confirms its higher standing in the overall CPU performance distribution.

However, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is a mobile processor with a 28-watt TDP, while the Intel Core i7-14700 is a desktop part with a 65-watt TDP. The AMD chip's integrated Radeon 840M graphics and its 4 nm process node indicate a design focused on power efficiency and portability. The Intel chip, by contrast, uses a 10 nm node and integrates UHD Graphics 770. The choice between these two is therefore a choice between a power-efficient mobile solution and a high-performance desktop solution. The benchmark data shows that the Intel part delivers far higher performance, but the AMD part operates in a completely different physical and thermal class.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ fundamentally in their core configuration. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core i7-14700 has 20 cores and 28 threads. This core count difference is the primary driver of the multithreaded performance gap. Clock speeds also differ: the AMD part has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, whereas the Intel part has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

The memory support differs as well. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded. The PCIe interface also differs: AMD uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD processor has a die size of 195 mm², while the Intel processor has a die size of 257 mm².

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is built on the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Gorgon Point, part of the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation. It uses a 4 nm process node manufactured by TSMC. Its cache structure includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache. It integrates Radeon 840M graphics and uses the AMD Socket FP8.

The Intel Core i7-14700 is based on the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-R, part of the Core 14th Gen series. It uses a 10 nm process node manufactured by Intel. Its cache structure includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. It integrates UHD Graphics 770 and uses the Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part is a mobile segment processor with a 2026 release date, while the Intel part is a desktop processor with a 2024 release date.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14700 wins in every measured benchmark category. Its largest advantages appear in floating point math (-59.8%), integer math (-57.3%), and data encryption (-58%). These results point to a clear superiority in compute-heavy tasks such as video rendering, complex data analysis, code compilation, and cryptographic operations. The multithread score of 40,318 versus 21,054 means the Intel part is the better choice for heavily threaded workloads like 3D rendering or batch processing.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440, despite losing every benchmark, has its own domain of advantage. Its 28-watt TDP and 4 nm process node make it suitable for thin-and-light mobile devices where battery life and thermal output are critical. Its support for LPDDR5X memory and its 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth indicate a design tailored for efficient mobile performance. The single-thread delta of -10.6% is the smallest gap, suggesting that for lightly threaded tasks, the AMD part is relatively competitive, though still behind. The AMD chip also offers ECC memory support, matching Intel on that front. Ultimately, the Intel part wins on all measured performance fronts, while the AMD part wins on power efficiency and mobile integration, factors not captured in these specific benchmarks.