AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 vs Intel Core i7-14650HX Comparison

The Intel Core i7-14650HX and AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 are both active mobile processors, but they are built for very different missions. The benchmark data shows a decisive performance gap in favor of the Intel part across every single measured workload, with the Intel chip winning all 11 head-to-head comparisons. The most lopsided victories come in compute-heavy tasks: in PassMark’s floating point math test, the i7-14650HX scores 84,999 against the Ryzen’s 42,934, a 98% advantage. Similarly, the Intel part nearly doubles the AMD chip in the physics test, posting 2,202 versus 1,119, a 96.8% lead. These are not marginal differences; they represent a fundamentally higher level of computational throughput.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i7-14650HX dominates every measurable workload in this comparison. In the PassMark multithread test, it scores 33,495 against the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440’s 21,054, a 59.1% lead. This is the most representative metric for all-core workloads, and the gap is enormous. The same pattern appears in integer math, where Intel’s 116,661 dwarfs AMD’s 65,991, a 76.8% advantage. The data compression test follows suit, with Intel at 398,418 versus AMD’s 256,420, a 55.4% lead. For encryption, Intel’s 22,917 is 84.5% higher than AMD’s 12,418, indicating that Intel’s chip handles cryptographic workloads with substantially more headroom.

The margin narrows considerably only in single-threaded tasks, but Intel still comes out ahead. In the PassMark single-thread test, the i7-14650HX scores 3,841 versus the Ryzen’s 3,785, a slim 1.5% lead. This suggests that while the Intel part has far more raw compute capacity, its per-core efficiency is only marginally better than AMD’s Zen 5 design. Extended instruction workloads show a 30.9% advantage for Intel (24,150 vs 18,456), and the prime number finding test shows Intel at 152 versus AMD’s 77, a 97.4% lead. Random string sorting goes to Intel by 57.9%, with scores of 43,035 and 27,252 respectively. The data is clear: Intel wins every head-to-head, and in most cases by a wide margin.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-14650HX has an average benchmark score of 41,576, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 averages 41,208. The difference is 0.9% in favor of Intel, placing both chips in a similar performance tier overall.

Q: How do the two chips compare in single-core performance?

A: In the PassMark single-thread test, the Intel chip scores 3,841 and the AMD chip scores 3,785. Intel leads by 1.5%, a very narrow margin that indicates comparable per-core capabilities.

Q: What is the biggest performance gap between the two?

A: The largest delta is in floating point math, where the Intel Core i7-14650HX leads by 98%. The Intel part scores 84,999 versus AMD’s 42,934 in that specific test.

Q: Which chip has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-14650HX has 16 cores and 24 threads. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has 6 cores and 12 threads. Intel has 10 more cores and 12 more threads.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core i7-14650HX and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 list ECC memory support as a feature.

Q: What are the nearest rivals for each chip based on average score?

A: For Intel, the nearest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H with an average score of 41,621 and a delta of -0.1%. For AMD, the nearest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H with an average score of 41,215 and a delta of 0%.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14650HX wins every single benchmark in the data set, so there is no workload where the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 comes out on top. However, the magnitude of Intel’s wins varies, which points to where each chip is most viable. The Intel part is overwhelmingly stronger in multi-threaded and parallel workloads. Its 98% lead in floating point math and 96.8% lead in physics show that it is better suited for scientific computing, simulation, and rendering tasks that scale with core count. The 84.5% advantage in encryption and 76.8% lead in integer math make it the clear choice for data processing, compression, and server-like workloads.

The AMD chip, while losing every test, comes closest in single-threaded performance. Its 1.5% deficit in the single-thread test means that for lightly threaded applications like basic office productivity, web browsing, or legacy software that doesn’t use many cores, the user experience would be nearly identical. The AMD part also has a significantly lower TDP of 28 watts versus Intel’s 55 watts, which the data suggests makes it a more power-efficient option for thin-and-light laptops where sustained all-core performance is not the priority. The Intel chip, with its higher core count and TDP, is better suited for a mobile workstation or a high-performance gaming laptop where power draw is less of a constraint.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The Intel Core i7-14650HX features 16 cores and 24 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has just 6 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks are close, with Intel at 2.20 GHz and AMD at 2.00 GHz, but the boost clocks diverge more significantly: Intel boosts to 5.20 GHz, while AMD reaches 4.80 GHz. The Intel chip has a TDP of 55 watts, nearly double AMD’s 28 watts. Socket compatibility differs as well, with Intel using BGA 1964 and AMD using Socket FP8. Memory support shows Intel offering DDR4 and DDR5, while AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X; both use dual-channel memory buses. AMD lists a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while Intel does not provide a figure. PCIe generation differs, with Intel supporting Gen 5 (16 lanes) and AMD supporting Gen 4 (16 lanes). The integrated graphics are also different: Intel uses UHD Graphics 710, while AMD uses Radeon 840M. The Intel multiplier is unlocked, whereas AMD’s is locked. Release dates differ by two years, with Intel launching on 2024-01-07 and AMD on 2026-01-04.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide is stark. The Intel Core i7-14650HX is built on the Raptor Lake architecture (codename Raptor Lake-HX) using a 10 nm process from Intel’s own foundry. The die size is 257 mm². The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 uses the Zen 5 architecture (codename Gorgon Point) on a 4 nm process from TSMC, with a smaller die of 195 mm². The L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core. L2 cache differs, with Intel providing 2 MB per core and AMD providing 1 MB per core. L3 cache is a major differentiator: Intel has 30 MB shared, while AMD has only 8 MB. The Intel chip has a higher core count and a larger die, which explains its higher power draw and superior multi-threaded performance. The AMD chip’s smaller process node and lower TDP suggest a focus on efficiency over raw throughput. The Intel part belongs to the Core 14th Gen family, while AMD’s is part of the Ryzen AI PRO 400 series (Zen 5 / Zen 5c). Both are active production parts for the mobile market.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous. The Intel Core i7-14650HX is the faster processor in every single test, with leads ranging from 1.5% in single-threaded work to 98% in floating point math. If the priority is maximum compute performance, particularly for multi-core tasks like rendering, simulation, or heavy data processing, the Intel chip is the only choice based on this data. Its 16 cores and 24 threads give it a massive parallel throughput advantage that the 6-core AMD part cannot match. The Intel chip’s 88th percentile ranking versus the AMD chip’s 87th percentile confirms that it sits slightly higher in the overall CPU hierarchy, and its nearest rivals—like the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H—are all within a 0.5% delta of its average score.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is not without merit, but its strengths are not visible in raw benchmark wins. It has a lower TDP of 28 watts, which makes it a better candidate for battery-conscious laptops where sustained heavy load is rare. Its 1.5% single-thread deficit means everyday responsiveness is nearly on par with the Intel part. For a user who values portability, battery life, and quiet operation over sheer processing power, the AMD chip is the more practical pick. For anyone who needs a mobile processor that can handle demanding workloads without compromise, the Intel Core i7-14650HX wins decisively on every benchmark metric. The data says the Intel chip is the performance king, while the AMD chip is the efficiency-focused alternative.