AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 vs Intel Core i5-14450HX Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 vs Intel Core i5-14450HX

The benchmark data presents a clear split between these two mobile processors. The Intel Core i5-14450HX dominates in raw computational throughput across most measured workloads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 counters with superior single-thread performance and an advantage in extended instruction handling. The Intel part wins eight of the eleven head-to-head comparisons, yet the AMD processor holds its ground where per-core efficiency and specific instruction sets matter.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i5-14450HX establishes its lead in nearly every throughput-oriented test. In floating point math, the Intel processor scores 58037 against the AMD's 42934, a 26 percent advantage. Integer math follows a similar pattern: 78330 for Intel versus 65991 for AMD, a 15.8 percent gap. These are substantial margins that indicate the Intel chip's higher core count and larger cache are paying off in compute-heavy operations.

Data encryption shows Intel ahead by 20.3 percent, scoring 15574 versus 12418. The physics test, which often reflects real-world gaming and simulation workloads, gives Intel a 24.1 percent edge (1475 vs 1119). Prime number finding, a test sensitive to integer throughput and cache behavior, favors Intel by 21.4 percent (98 vs 77). Multithread performance, the aggregate measure of parallel capability, sees Intel at 23680 versus AMD's 21054, an 11.1 percent difference.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 wins three comparisons. Single-thread performance is its strongest showing: 3785 versus Intel's 3643, a 3.9 percent lead. This result appears twice in the data (both passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread record identical scores), confirming consistency. Extended instructions, a test that exercises AVX and similar instruction sets, also goes to AMD: 18456 versus 17207, a 7.3 percent advantage. Data compression is the third AMD win, though by a narrow margin: 27252 versus 29565 actually favors Intel in that specific test, so the AMD wins are exactly three: single-thread, extended instructions, and one more. Reviewing the full list, AMD wins extended instructions and single-thread (recorded twice), which counts as two distinct tests. The third win is data compression? No, the data shows Intel winning compression 278538 vs 256420. The correct AMD wins are: passmark_extended_instructions (7.3 percent), passmark_single_thread (3.9 percent), and passmark_singlethread (3.9 percent, same test). That is three entries but two unique tests. The winsA field states 3, so the database counts both single-thread entries separately. The data also shows AMD losing random string sorting by 7.8 percent (27252 vs 29565) and data compression by 7.9 percent (256420 vs 278538).

The overall average benchmark score tells a similar story. AMD's average is 41208, while Intel's is 32040. This is a significant difference, but it reflects the different benchmark sets each processor was tested with. The AMD part includes only PassMark tests, while the Intel part includes Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 results alongside PassMark. The Cinebench scores for Intel (R23 multicore 20108, singlecore 2838) are strong, but they are not directly comparable to AMD's PassMark-only set. The nearest rivals for each processor confirm their respective performance tiers: AMD's closest competitor is the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H at 41215 (0 percent delta), while Intel's closest is the Core i7-13705H at 32076 (-0.1 percent).

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14450HX is the clear choice for multi-threaded workloads. Its 10 cores and 16 threads outperform the AMD's 6 cores and 12 threads in every parallel test except extended instructions. The 26 percent lead in floating point math and 15.8 percent in integer math indicate strong performance for scientific computing, financial modeling, and video encoding. The 24.1 percent physics advantage suggests better gaming performance, as physics calculations often become the bottleneck in CPU-bound game scenarios. Data encryption at 20.3 percent ahead points to faster file encryption and VPN throughput.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 wins where single-thread responsiveness and specialized instructions matter. The 3.9 percent single-thread lead means snappier application launch times and better performance in lightly-threaded software like web browsers, office suites, and legacy applications. The 7.3 percent extended instructions advantage indicates superior AVX-512 class performance, which benefits certain scientific simulations, cryptography, and machine learning inference workloads. The AMD part also carries a Radeon 840M integrated GPU, which is a more capable graphics solution than Intel's UHD Graphics 710 for light gaming and media playback.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different designs. AMD uses Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, with a die size of 195 mm². Intel uses Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm Intel process, with a larger 257 mm² die. The AMD chip is built on a more advanced process node, which explains its lower 28 W TDP versus Intel's 55 W. This power difference is significant: the AMD part uses less than half the thermal budget while still delivering competitive single-thread performance.

Cache configuration differs notably. Both have 80 KB L1 per core, but AMD provides 1 MB L2 per core while Intel provides 2 MB per core. The L3 cache is the biggest gap: AMD has 8 MB total, Intel has 20 MB shared. This 12 MB difference in L3 explains Intel's advantage in cache-sensitive workloads like prime number finding and data compression. The Intel part's larger L3 helps keep more working set resident on-chip, reducing memory traffic.

Memory support also diverges. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5, with no bandwidth figure recorded in the database. Both use dual-channel memory buses. ECC memory is supported by both, which is useful for workstations and servers.

PCIe generation differs: AMD uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Intel's Gen 5 support doubles the theoretical bandwidth for compatible devices like next-generation GPUs and NVMe drives, though Gen 4 remains sufficient for most current hardware.

The socket and platform are incompatible: AMD uses Socket FP8, Intel uses BGA 1964. The AMD part is part of the Ryzen AI PRO 400 series (Gorgon Point codename), while Intel belongs to the Core 14th Gen series (Raptor Lake-HX Refresh). The Intel part has an unlocked multiplier, enabling overclocking on supported motherboards; the AMD part does not.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has better single-thread performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 scores 3785 in the PassMark single-thread test, 3.9 percent higher than the Intel Core i5-14450HX at 3643.

Q: How large is the multi-thread performance gap?

A: The Intel Core i5-14450HX leads in PassMark multithread with 23680 versus 21054, an 11.1 percent advantage. The margin grows to 26 percent in floating point math and 24.1 percent in physics.

Q: Which processor supports faster PCIe?

A: Intel supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while AMD supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes.

Q: What are the power consumption differences?

A: The AMD processor has a 28 W TDP, the Intel processor has a 55 W TDP. The AMD part uses a 4 nm TSMC process, the Intel part uses a 10 nm Intel process.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 and Intel Core i5-14450HX support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: Intel has 20 MB shared L3 cache, AMD has 8 MB. Intel also has 2 MB L2 per core versus AMD's 1 MB per core.

The Verdict

The data shows a straightforward conclusion: the Intel Core i5-14450HX is the stronger all-around performer for multi-threaded and compute-intensive workloads. It wins eight of eleven comparisons, with decisive margins in floating point (26 percent), physics (24.1 percent), encryption (20.3 percent), and prime finding (21.4 percent). Its 10 cores, 16 threads, and 20 MB L3 cache provide a structural advantage that the AMD part cannot overcome in throughput tests.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is the better choice for users prioritizing single-thread responsiveness, power efficiency, and extended instruction performance. Its 3.9 percent single-thread lead and 7.3 percent extended instructions advantage make it suitable for office productivity, development work, and applications that use AVX-512 class instructions. The 28 W TDP makes it attractive for thin-and-light laptops where battery life and thermal management are critical.

The Intel part sits at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, the AMD at the 87th. The higher percentile for AMD reflects its strong single-thread and instruction-specific performance relative to the broader CPU landscape, while Intel's lower percentile is pulled down by its weaker single-thread showing despite its multi-thread dominance.

For gaming, the Intel part's 24.1 percent physics advantage is the key indicator. For professional workloads like video rendering, scientific simulation, or database processing, Intel's 15.8 percent integer and 26 percent floating point leads are decisive. For general productivity, web browsing, and office software, the AMD part's single-thread edge will feel snappier. For users who need both multi-thread muscle and power efficiency, the Intel part offers more performance per watt in absolute terms, though its 55 W TDP requires adequate cooling.

The AMD part's Radeon 840M integrated graphics is a more capable iGPU than Intel's UHD Graphics 710, which narrows the gap for users who skip discrete GPUs. The Intel part's unlocked multiplier and Gen 5 PCIe support give it a platform advantage for enthusiasts and future-proofing.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. AMD has 6 cores and 12 threads, Intel has 10 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for AMD and 2.40 GHz for Intel, though both boost to 4.80 GHz. TDP is 28 W for AMD, 55 W for Intel. Sockets are AMD Socket FP8 versus Intel BGA 1964. Architecture is Zen 5 versus Raptor Lake. Process nodes are 4 nm TSMC versus 10 nm Intel. Die sizes are 195 mm² versus 257 mm². L2 cache is 1 MB per core versus 2 MB per core. L3 cache is 8 MB versus 20 MB shared. Memory support is DDR5, LPDDR5X versus DDR4, DDR5. Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for AMD, no figure recorded for Intel. PCIe is Gen 4, 16 lanes versus Gen 5, 16 lanes. Integrated graphics are Radeon 840M versus UHD Graphics 710. Release dates are January 2026 for AMD and January 2024 for Intel. The Intel part has an unlocked multiplier, the AMD part does not. Part numbers are 100-000001866 for AMD and SRMXK for Intel.