AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 vs Intel Processor 300 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database does not contain a direct head-to-head benchmark comparison between the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 and the Intel Processor 300. The head-to-head record is empty, and neither processor records a win in a direct matchup. However, the available data allows for a comparison through their relative standing in the broader market and their individual performance profiles.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has a recorded average benchmark score of 37762, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs tracked in the database. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132, scores 37804, which is a delta of -0.1% relative to the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435. The Intel Core 5 211E scores 37829, a delta of -0.2%. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37904, a delta of -0.4%. The Intel Core i5-13600K scores 37685, a delta of +0.2%, meaning the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 is 0.2% ahead of that desktop chip. These figures indicate the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 sits in a tight cluster of capable processors, with all deltas within a narrow band of -0.4% to +0.2%.

The Intel Processor 300, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as zero, and it has no nearest rivals listed. Its percentile ranking of 50 places it at the midpoint of all CPUs, which is substantially lower than the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435's 86th percentile. Without direct scores, the Intel Processor 300 cannot be positioned numerically against the AMD part, but the percentile data alone shows a wide gap in overall standing.

For specific workloads, the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 delivers a PassMark single-thread score of 3757 and a PassMark multithread score of 19091. Its integer math score is 60879, floating point math is 41114, and extended instructions score is 16724. Data encryption scores 11267, data compression reaches 232803, and random string sorting hits 24936. Physics processing scores 995, and find prime numbers scores 57. These are the only benchmark figures available for either processor, so any direct comparison must rely on these numbers alone for the AMD side and the absence of data for the Intel side.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturers and use fundamentally different designs. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 is built on the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Gorgon Point, part of the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation that uses a mix of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process node by TSMC. The Intel Processor 300 uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-S, from the Intel Processor generation, and is fabricated on a 10 nm process node by Intel.

The core counts differ significantly. The AMD part has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel part has 2 cores and 4 threads. The base clock on the AMD is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 3.90 GHz, but no boost clock is recorded in the database. The AMD processor has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel processor has a TDP of 46 watts.

Cache layouts also diverge. Both parts have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD processor has 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 4 MB of L3 cache. The Intel processor has 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part also has a recorded die size of 163 mm², while no die size is listed for the AMD part.

Memory support differs as well. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It supports ECC memory. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5, also with a dual-channel bus, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded and ECC memory is not supported. PCIe connectivity differs: the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 14 CPU lanes, while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

Integrated graphics are also different. The AMD processor uses the Radeon 840M, while the Intel processor uses UHD Graphics 710. The AMD part is a mobile processor on AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel part is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part was released on January 4, 2026, and the Intel part on January 7, 2024. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $82. No launch MSRP is recorded for the AMD part.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Processor 300 has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What is the performance percentile of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 is in the 86th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Intel Processor 300 is in the 50th percentile.

Q: Does the Intel Processor 300 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark scores for the Intel Processor 300, and its average benchmark score is recorded as zero.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel Processor 300 supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: What are the TDP values for these processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has a TDP of 28 watts. The Intel Processor 300 has a TDP of 46 watts.

Q: What integrated graphics does each processor use?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 uses the Radeon 840M. The Intel Processor 300 uses UHD Graphics 710.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every recorded specification. Core count: AMD has 6 cores, Intel has 2. Threads: AMD has 12, Intel has 4. Base clock: AMD is 2.00 GHz, Intel is 3.90 GHz. Boost clock: AMD is 4.50 GHz, Intel has no recorded boost clock. TDP: AMD is 28 watts, Intel is 46 watts. Socket: AMD uses AMD Socket FP8, Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. Architecture: AMD is Zen 5, Intel is Raptor Lake. Codename: AMD is Gorgon Point, Intel is Raptor Lake-S. Generation: AMD is Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c), Intel is Intel Processor (Raptor Lake). Process node: AMD is 4 nm from TSMC, Intel is 10 nm from Intel. Die size: AMD has none recorded, Intel is 163 mm². L2 cache per core: AMD is 1 MB, Intel is 1.25 MB. L3 cache: AMD is 4 MB, Intel is 6 MB shared. Memory support: AMD is DDR5 and LPDDR5X, Intel is DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth: AMD is 89.6 GB/s, Intel has none recorded. ECC memory: AMD supports it, Intel does not. PCIe: AMD is Gen 4 with 14 lanes, Intel is Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics: AMD is Radeon 840M, Intel is UHD Graphics 710. Market segment: AMD is mobile, Intel is desktop. Release date: AMD is January 4, 2026, Intel is January 7, 2024. Launch MSRP: AMD has none recorded, Intel is $82. Part number: AMD is 100-000001788, Intel is SRN3J. Benchmark scores: AMD has a full set, Intel has none. Percentile: AMD is 86, Intel is 50. Average benchmark score: AMD is 37762, Intel is 0. Nearest rivals: AMD has four listed, Intel has none.

The L1 cache is the same at 80 KB per core for both, and both use a dual-channel memory bus. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and both are listed as active in production.

The Verdict

The data shows two processors aimed at different segments with a large performance gap. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 records a full set of benchmark scores, an average score of 37762, and an 86th percentile ranking. Its nearest rivals, all scoring between 37685 and 37904, confirm it competes at a level similar to mid-range desktop and mobile parts. The Intel Processor 300 has no recorded benchmark scores, an average score of zero, and a 50th percentile ranking. Without any direct benchmark data for the Intel part, a numerical comparison of performance is not possible.

The AMD processor uses a 4 nm TSMC process, has 6 cores and 12 threads, a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, and a TDP of 28 watts. The Intel processor uses a 10 nm Intel process, has 2 cores and 4 threads, a base clock of 3.90 GHz with no boost clock recorded, and a TDP of 46 watts. The AMD part also supports ECC memory and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part does not support ECC and supports DDR4 in addition to DDR5. The Intel part does support PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 14 lanes.

The Intel part is a desktop processor with a launch MSRP of $82 and a release date of January 7, 2024. The AMD part is a mobile processor released January 4, 2026. The data indicates the AMD processor holds the stronger position in overall CPU performance as measured by the database, while the Intel processor offers a more limited specification set with no benchmark confirmation.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 wins in every category where data exists. It has more cores and threads, a higher recorded average benchmark score, a higher percentile ranking, a smaller process node, a lower TDP, ECC memory support, LPDDR5X memory support, a higher memory bandwidth figure, and a full set of benchmark results across single-thread, multithread, integer math, floating point math, extended instructions, encryption, compression, random string sorting, physics, and prime number finding. Its recorded boost clock of 4.50 GHz gives it a defined peak frequency, and its market segment is mobile, which aligns with its lower power draw.

The Intel Processor 300 wins in the categories where the database records an advantage. It has a higher base clock at 3.90 GHz compared to the AMD's 2.00 GHz. It has more L2 cache per core at 1.25 MB versus 1 MB, and more L3 cache at 6 MB shared versus 4 MB. It uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, a newer and wider PCIe generation than the AMD's Gen 4 with 14 lanes. It has a recorded die size of 163 mm², while the AMD has none recorded. It is a desktop processor, which may suit stationary systems, and it supports DDR4 memory in addition to DDR5, offering broader memory compatibility. It also has a recorded launch MSRP of $82 and an earlier release date of January 7, 2024.

The use-case split follows the data: the AMD part is positioned for mobile systems with higher core counts, lower power, and confirmed benchmark performance. The Intel part is positioned for desktop systems with a higher base clock, more cache, PCIe Gen 5, and a lower recorded launch price. The absence of benchmark scores for the Intel part means its real-world performance cannot be verified from the database, while the AMD part's scores place it in the 86th percentile, within 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and the Intel Core 5 211E.