AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 vs Intel Core 7 150U Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 and Intel Core 7 150U are both mobile processors, but the recorded data shows them operating in different performance tiers. The AMD part holds a decisive advantage across the majority of benchmark tests, while the Intel chip secures narrow victories in two specific workloads. The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 posts an average benchmark score of 37762, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 7 150U averages 17395, which puts it in the 71st percentile. This gap in average scores, a difference of over 20000 points, establishes the AMD processor as the stronger overall performer in the database.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most significant margin in the head-to-head comparison appears in the PassMark extended instructions test. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 scores 16724, which is 91.2% higher than the Intel Core 7 150U's 8748. This result indicates a substantial advantage in workloads that utilize advanced instruction sets, such as encryption or multimedia processing. The data compression test also shows a large gap, with AMD scoring 232803 against Intel's 158622, a 46.8% difference. This suggests that the AMD processor handles compression tasks considerably faster.

The multithreaded PassMark score reinforces the AMD lead. The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 achieves 19091, which is 29.9% ahead of the Core 7 150U's 14700. This aligns with the average benchmark score gap and confirms that the AMD chip delivers stronger performance in heavily threaded applications. In floating point math, AMD scores 41114 versus Intel's 34405, a 19.5% advantage. Integer math shows a similar pattern, with AMD at 60879 and Intel at 51057, a 19.2% difference. Random string sorting also favors AMD, with a score of 24936 compared to Intel's 18269, a 36.5% lead that points to better memory handling and sorting efficiency.

The single-thread results are closer but still favor the AMD processor. The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 scores 3757 in the PassMark single-thread test, while the Core 7 150U scores 3508, giving AMD a 7.1% edge. This is a smaller margin than the multithreaded or extended instruction gaps, but it still indicates that the AMD core is faster for single-threaded tasks. Data encryption is another AMD win, with a score of 11267 versus 10025, a 12.4% advantage.

The Intel Core 7 150U does secure two wins, but both are narrow. In the PassMark find prime numbers test, Intel scores 58 against AMD's 57, a 1.7% difference. The physics test also goes to Intel, with a score of 1012 versus AMD's 995, again a 1.7% margin. These results suggest that in these specific integer and physics simulation workloads, the Intel architecture holds a slight edge, but the magnitude is small compared to AMD's victories. Across the 11 head-to-head benchmarks, the AMD processor wins 9, while the Intel processor wins 2.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 uses the Zen 5 architecture, built on a 4 nm process node by TSMC. Its codename is Gorgon Point, and it belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. In contrast, the Intel Core 7 150U is based on Raptor Lake, specifically Raptor Lake-U, manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The process node difference is notable, with the AMD part using a more advanced manufacturing technology.

Core counts diverge as well. The AMD processor has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel processor has 10 cores and 12 threads. The Intel part uses more physical cores to reach the same thread count, which indicates a hybrid core design typical of Raptor Lake. Cache configurations also differ. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, with a total of 4 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core 7 150U also has 80 KB of L1 cache per core but a larger L2 at 1.25 MB per core, and it provides 12 MB of shared L3 cache. This gives Intel a larger total cache, which may explain its slight wins in the prime number and physics tests.

Memory support differs between the two. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, but the database does not list a memory bandwidth figure, and it does not support ECC memory. The AMD part uses an AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel part uses Intel BGA 1744.

PCIe connectivity also separates them. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel Core 7 150U provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU. This gives the AMD processor more available lanes for expansion devices. Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD part uses the Radeon 840M, while the Intel part uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units. The database does not include benchmark scores for these integrated GPUs, so no performance comparison is possible from the recorded data.

The release dates show the AMD processor arriving later. The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has a release date in January 2026, while the Core 7 150U was released in January 2024. The AMD part is a newer design by roughly two years. The Intel processor has a lower TDP of 15 watts compared to AMD's 28 watts, which suggests the Intel chip is tuned for lower power envelopes despite its higher core count.

The Verdict

The benchmark data clearly favors the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435. It wins 9 of 11 head-to-head tests, and its wins include the largest margins in the comparison. The 91.2% advantage in extended instructions and the 46.8% advantage in data compression show that the AMD architecture is substantially more efficient in compute-heavy and data-heavy tasks. The average benchmark score of 37762, which places it in the 86th percentile, is more than double the Intel part's average of 17395. This is not a close contest in overall performance.

The Intel Core 7 150U does have specific strengths. Its wins in the find prime numbers and physics tests, both by 1.7%, indicate that the Raptor Lake architecture handles certain integer and physics workloads marginally better. The larger L3 cache of 12 MB and the higher core count of 10 may contribute to these results. However, these victories are small and isolated. The Intel processor sits in the 71st percentile and trails the AMD part in every other recorded benchmark, including single-thread performance, where AMD leads by 7.1%.

For users prioritizing raw computing performance, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 is the stronger choice according to the data. For workloads that specifically involve prime number calculations or physics simulations, the Intel Core 7 150U shows a slight edge, but the margin is minimal. The AMD processor's higher TDP of 28 watts versus 15 watts indicates it may require more power, but the performance returns are significant.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has an average benchmark score of 37762, while the Intel Core 7 150U has an average of 17395.

Q: In how many benchmark tests does each processor win?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 wins 9 of the 11 head-to-head benchmarks, while the Intel Core 7 150U wins 2.

Q: What is the largest performance difference between the two?

A: The largest difference is in the PassMark extended instructions test, where the AMD processor scores 16724, which is 91.2% higher than the Intel processor's 8748.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 7 150U has 10 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: How do the processors compare in single-thread performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 scores 3757 in the PassMark single-thread test, which is 7.1% ahead of the Intel Core 7 150U's 3508.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel Core 7 150U supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 wins in the majority of workloads. It leads in data compression by 46.8%, data encryption by 12.4%, extended instructions by 91.2%, floating point math by 19.5%, integer math by 19.2%, multithreaded performance by 29.9%, random string sorting by 36.5%, and single-thread performance by 7.1%. These results indicate that the AMD processor is stronger in general productivity, mathematical computation, encryption, compression, and single-threaded applications. Its 86th percentile ranking versus Intel's 71st percentile reinforces its position as the higher-performing part.

The Intel Core 7 150U wins in two areas. It scores 58 in the find prime numbers test, edging out AMD's 57, and it scores 1012 in the physics test, slightly ahead of AMD's 995. Both wins are by 1.7%. These are narrow margins, and they suggest that the Intel processor has a minor advantage in prime number generation and physics simulation workloads. The Intel part also has a larger L3 cache at 12 MB, which may benefit certain cache-sensitive tasks, but the benchmark data does not show broad gains from this cache size.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 and Intel Core 7 150U differ across several key specifications. The AMD processor uses the Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel processor uses Raptor Lake on a 10 nm process from Intel. The AMD part has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel part has 10 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for AMD and 1.80 GHz for Intel, but the boost clock is higher for Intel at 5.40 GHz versus AMD's 4.50 GHz.

Cache configurations differ: the AMD part has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of L3, while the Intel part has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC support, while the Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 without ECC and has no recorded bandwidth figure. The AMD part has 14 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel part has 8. The AMD processor uses Radeon 840M integrated graphics, while the Intel processor uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units. The AMD part has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel part has a TDP of 15 watts.