AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 vs Intel Core 5 223PE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435

CORE STATE Gorgon Point
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 4.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 4 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 5 223PE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.9 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
232,803
346,623
passmark_data_encryption
11,267
18,448
passmark_extended_instructions
16,724
24,672
passmark_find_prime_numbers
57
159
passmark_floating_point_math
41,114
76,468
passmark_integer_math
60,879
99,819
passmark_multithread
19,091
31,124
passmark_physics
995
2,493
passmark_random_string_sorting
24,936
35,798
passmark_single_thread
3,757
4,219
passmark_singlethread
3,757
4,219
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
2,666
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
376
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
11,111
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,568
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
26,455
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
3,734

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 vs Intel Core 5 223PE

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data shows a complete sweep for the Intel Core 5 223PE across all head-to-head tests. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 does not win a single comparison, with the Intel part leading by margins that range from 11% to 64.2%. The largest gap appears in the passmark_find_prime_numbers test, where Intel scores 159 against AMD's 57, a delta of 64.2%. This test is particularly sensitive to integer throughput and branch handling, and the result indicates a substantial advantage for the Intel design in that workload.

The passmark_physics test shows a similar imbalance. Intel records 2493 while AMD manages 995, a 60.1% deficit. Physics simulations often scale with core count and memory subsystem efficiency, and the Intel part's 8 cores and 16 threads provide a structural advantage over AMD's 6 cores and 12 threads. The floating-point math test follows the same pattern: Intel scores 76468 versus AMD's 41114, a 46.2% gap. This workload benefits from wider execution resources and higher sustained clocks, both of which favor the Intel processor.

In integer math, Intel posts 99819 against AMD's 60879, a 39% lead. The data encryption test shows Intel ahead at 18448 versus 11267, a 38.9% margin. Data compression follows closely: Intel at 346623, AMD at 232803, a 32.8% difference. Extended instructions show Intel at 24672 versus AMD's 16724, a 32.2% gap. Random string sorting is the closest of the multi-threaded tests, with Intel at 35798 and AMD at 24936, a 30.3% margin.

The multithread score, which serves as a broad indicator of parallel performance, gives Intel 31124 against AMD's 19091, a 38.7% lead. The single-thread score is the narrowest difference between the two parts: Intel at 4219, AMD at 3757, an 11% margin. This suggests that while the AMD architecture is competitive in lightly threaded workloads, the Intel part still holds a clear advantage even there. The average benchmark score reflects the overall trend: AMD sits at 37762, while Intel reaches 40585, a difference that places the Intel part in the 87th percentile of all CPUs versus AMD's 86th percentile.

The nearest rival data provides additional context. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 sits within 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, and within 0.2% of the Intel Core i5-13600K. The Intel Core 5 223PE, by contrast, lands within 0.1% of the Intel Core 7 253PE and within 0.2% of the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H. These proximity values indicate that both processors are positioned in a dense performance cluster, but the Intel part operates at the higher end of that cluster.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge significantly in their underlying designs. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 uses the Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm process from TSMC, under the Gorgon Point codename. The Intel Core 5 223PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename on Intel's 10 nm process. The process node difference alone suggests that AMD has a density and efficiency advantage on paper, but the benchmark results do not translate that into a performance win.

Core configurations differ as well. AMD provides 6 cores and 12 threads, while Intel provides 8 cores and 16 threads. Both parts use an 80 KB L1 cache per core, but the L2 cache differs: AMD allocates 1 MB per core, while Intel allocates 2 MB per core. The L3 cache shows an even larger gap. AMD has only 4 MB of L3, while Intel has 24 MB shared. That 6x difference in L3 capacity is likely a major contributor to the Intel part's dominance in data-heavy workloads such as compression and encryption, where larger caches reduce memory traffic.

Clock speeds favor Intel as well. AMD has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. Intel starts at 2.90 GHz base and reaches 5.20 GHz boost. The higher boost clock helps explain the 11% single-thread advantage, while the higher base clock combined with more cores helps explain the larger multithread margins.

Memory support differs in scope. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus, and both show the same memory bandwidth figure of 89.6 GB/s. Both parts support ECC memory. PCIe capabilities differ: AMD provides Gen 4 with 14 CPU lanes, while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The Intel platform offers newer and wider I/O connectivity.

Integrated graphics also differ. AMD uses the Radeon 840M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. The market segment classification differs as well: AMD is listed as Mobile, while Intel is listed as Desktop. Socket types reflect this: AMD uses AMD Socket FP8, while Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. The Intel part carries a launch MSRP of $232. The AMD part has no launch MSRP listed in the database.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear performance hierarchy. The Intel Core 5 223PE wins every benchmark in the head-to-head comparison, with margins from 11% in single-thread work to 64.2% in prime number finding. The Intel part also holds a higher average benchmark score, 40585 versus 37762, and a higher percentile ranking, 87 versus 86. Buyers or system designers who prioritize raw compute throughput should select the Intel processor based on the recorded measurements.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 does have structural advantages that the benchmarks do not capture directly. It uses a 4 nm process, which typically indicates better power efficiency per operation, and it is classified as a mobile part with a 28 W TDP. The Intel part has a 65 W TDP. For thermally constrained or battery-powered designs, the AMD part may be the more practical choice despite its lower scores. The AMD part also supports LPDDR5X memory, which is common in mobile platforms.

The Intel part, by contrast, is a desktop processor with a higher power envelope and a larger cache configuration. It supports DDR4 in addition to DDR5, which gives system builders more memory flexibility. Its PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes provides more headroom for discrete GPUs and NVMe storage. The data shows that for performance-focused desktop builds, the Intel Core 5 223PE is the stronger option.

The verdict from the database is unambiguous: the Intel part outperforms the AMD part in every measured workload. The AMD part remains viable for mobile or low-power scenarios, but the recorded scores do not place it ahead in any compute category.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several specification fields. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 5 223PE has 8 cores and 16 threads. AMD's base clock is 2.00 GHz versus Intel's 2.90 GHz. AMD's boost clock is 4.50 GHz versus Intel's 5.20 GHz. TDP differs: 28 W for AMD, 65 W for Intel. Socket types are different: AMD Socket FP8 versus Intel Socket 1700.

Process node: AMD uses 4 nm from TSMC, Intel uses 10 nm from Intel. The cache hierarchy differs in L2 and L3: AMD has 1 MB L2 per core and 4 MB L3, Intel has 2 MB L2 per core and 24 MB shared L3. Memory support: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. PCIe: AMD has Gen 4 with 14 lanes, Intel has Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics: AMD uses Radeon 840M, Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. Market segment: AMD is Mobile, Intel is Desktop. Release dates differ: AMD in January 2026, Intel in March 2026. Part numbers are 100-000001788 for AMD and SA4QF for Intel.

The remaining fields are identical or absent. Both parts have 80 KB L1 per core, dual-channel memory buses, 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, ECC support, locked multipliers, active production status, and no listed transistor or die size data.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-thread score?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PE scores 4219 in passmark_single_thread, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 scores 3757. Intel leads by 11%.

Q: How large is the multithread performance gap?

A: Intel scores 31124 in passmark_multithread versus AMD's 19091, a 38.7% lead for Intel.

Q: What is the difference in L3 cache capacity?

A: The AMD part has 4 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel part has 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 and the Intel Core 5 223PE have ECC memory support listed in the database.

Q: What are the clock speed differences?

A: AMD has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. Intel has a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: Which processor has more PCIe lanes?

A: Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, while AMD provides Gen 4 with 14 CPU lanes.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 5 PRO 435
5 223PE
Core Specs
Cores
6
8 +33.3%
Threads
12
16 +33.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
2.9 +45.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.5
5.2 +15.6%
Frequency (GHz)
2
2.9 +45.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.5
5.2 +15.6%
Multiplier
20
29 +45.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
4 MB
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
65 +132.1%
PL1
—
65 W
PL2
—
219 W
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
—
Codename
Gorgon Point
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 4, 14 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
2 + 4
—
E-Core Frequency
2000 MHz up to 3.4 GHz
—
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 840M
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$232
Part Number
100-000001788
SA4QF
Package
FP8
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 Details View Core 5 223PE Details