AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 vs Intel Core 5 211TE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435

CORE STATE Gorgon Point
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 4.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 4 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 5 211TE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1.7 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo
CACHE 20 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
232,803
133,434
passmark_data_encryption
11,267
7,231
passmark_extended_instructions
16,724
8,615
passmark_find_prime_numbers
57
72
passmark_floating_point_math
41,114
26,150
passmark_integer_math
60,879
33,991
passmark_multithread
19,091
11,685
passmark_physics
995
1,278
passmark_random_string_sorting
24,936
14,838
passmark_single_thread
3,757
1,408
passmark_singlethread
3,757
1,408
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
1,229
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
173
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
5,124
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
723
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
12,201
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
1,722

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 vs Intel Core 5 211TE

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 and Intel Core 5 211TE occupy different corners of the processor market, one a mobile part and the other a desktop chip. The recorded data shows a clear performance hierarchy between them, with the AMD processor dominating most computing tasks while the Intel chip secures specific victories in particular workloads.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results reveal a decisive advantage for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 across most measured workloads. The largest margin comes in the PassMark single-thread test, where the AMD processor scores 3757 against the Intel Core 5 211TE's 1408, a 166.8% difference. This is an exceptionally wide gap for single-core performance and indicates a substantial architectural efficiency advantage for the Zen 5 design.

The extended instructions workload shows the AMD chip at 16724 versus 8615 for Intel, a 94.1% lead. This category typically measures cryptographic and SIMD instruction throughput, and the data indicates the AMD processor handles these operations at nearly double the rate. Integer math follows a similar pattern, with the AMD part scoring 60879 against Intel's 33991, a 79.1% advantage. These results suggest the Zen 5 cores deliver significantly more work per clock cycle than the Bartlett Lake architecture.

Data compression favors the AMD processor heavily, with a score of 232803 compared to 133434 for the Intel chip, a 74.5% margin. Random string sorting shows a 68.1% difference, with the AMD part at 24936 and Intel at 14838. The multithread test gives the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 a score of 19091 versus 11685 for the Intel Core 5 211TE, a 63.4% lead. This result is notable because the Intel processor has more cores and threads on paper, yet still trails substantially in the aggregate multithreaded workload.

Floating-point math shows the AMD chip at 41114 against Intel's 26150, a 57.2% difference. Data encryption gives AMD a 55.8% advantage with scores of 11267 and 7231 respectively. The Intel Core 5 211TE claims two victories in the head-to-head comparison. The physics test shows Intel ahead with 1278 against AMD's 995, a 22.1% margin. The prime number finding test also goes to Intel, with a score of 72 versus 57 for the AMD processor, a 20.8% difference. These two wins suggest the Intel architecture retains an edge in specific computational patterns, likely related to certain sequential algorithms or branch-heavy workloads.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 uses the Zen 5 architecture built on a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel Core 5 211TE uses the Bartlett Lake architecture on a 10 nm process from Intel's own fabs. The manufacturing process difference is significant, as the smaller node typically enables higher transistor density and better power efficiency.

Core counts differ substantially. The AMD processor has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel chip has 10 cores and 16 threads. Despite this core count disadvantage, the AMD part wins the multithread benchmark by a wide margin, which points to per-core performance differences rather than raw core quantity.

The cache hierarchy differs between the two. Both use 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but the L2 cache is 1 MB per core on the AMD chip versus 1.25 MB per core on the Intel processor. The L3 cache presents a more dramatic difference, with the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 having only 4 MB while the Intel Core 5 211TE has 20 MB shared. This fivefold L3 cache advantage for Intel does not translate into benchmark wins in the memory-sensitive tests recorded.

Platform support varies significantly. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8 and supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5, but with a lower memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. PCIe capabilities also differ: the AMD part provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes, while the Intel chip offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes, giving the desktop part a newer interface standard and more lanes.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 includes Radeon 840M graphics, while the Intel Core 5 211TE carries UHD Graphics 730. The market segments confirm their intended use, with AMD targeting mobile and Intel targeting desktop platforms.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 establishes dominance in nearly every measured compute category. The single-thread advantage of 166.8% means applications that rely on fast single-core response, such as interactive workloads, will benefit strongly from the AMD chip. The extended instructions lead of 94.1% makes the AMD processor well suited for workloads involving encryption, compression, and SIMD-heavy code. The data compression score of 232803 and random string sorting score of 24936 indicate strong performance in data manipulation tasks.

The integer math result of 60879 suggests the AMD processor handles general-purpose arithmetic efficiently. Floating-point math at 41114 points to good performance in scientific and graphics-related calculations. The 63.4% multithread advantage, achieved with fewer cores, means the AMD chip delivers better aggregate throughput across parallel workloads.

The Intel Core 5 211TE finds its strengths in the physics test and prime number calculation. The physics score of 1278 against 995 represents a 22.1% margin, and the prime number score of 72 versus 57 is a 20.8% advantage. These results point to workloads involving certain deterministic loops or sequential number-crunching patterns where the Intel architecture performs relatively better, though the absolute scores are lower in the overall context of the benchmark suite.

The percentile data reinforces the performance split. The AMD processor sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel chip ranks at the 69th percentile. This places the AMD part in a higher overall performance tier despite its mobile orientation. The average benchmark scores also reflect the gap: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 averages 37762, while the Intel Core 5 211TE averages 15370.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts represent a major difference, with Intel offering 10 cores and 16 threads against AMD's 6 cores and 12 threads. Clock speeds also differ, with the AMD base clock at 2.00 GHz and boost at 4.50 GHz, while the Intel base clock is 1.70 GHz with a boost of 4.80 GHz. The Intel chip has a higher boost ceiling, but the AMD chip has a higher base clock.

Thermal design power shows the Intel part consuming 45 W against AMD's 28 W, reflecting the desktop versus mobile positioning. The process node difference is stark: 4 nm for AMD versus 10 nm for Intel. The die size for the Intel chip is 215 mm², while no die size is recorded for the AMD part.

Memory support differs in flexibility, with Intel supporting both DDR4 and DDR5 while AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The memory bandwidth favors AMD at 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s for Intel. The L3 cache size is a significant difference, with Intel providing 20 MB shared against AMD's 4 MB. The L2 cache also differs at 1.25 MB per core for Intel versus 1 MB per core for AMD.

The PCIe configuration gives Intel the newer standard with Gen 5 and 16 lanes, while AMD uses Gen 4 with 14 lanes. The socket types are incompatible, with AMD using Socket FP8 and Intel using Socket 1700. The release dates show the Intel processor launched earlier, with a recorded release date of 2025-01-12T17:00:00.000Z, while the AMD processor followed with a release date of 2026-01-04T17:00:00.000Z. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $221.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-thread benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 scores 3757 in the PassMark single-thread test, which is 166.8% higher than the Intel Core 5 211TE's score of 1408.

Q: How do the two processors compare in multithreaded performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 achieves a multithread score of 19091, which is 63.4% higher than the Intel Core 5 211TE's 11685, despite the Intel chip having 10 cores and 16 threads versus 6 cores and 12 threads for AMD.

Q: In which benchmarks does the Intel Core 5 211TE outperform the AMD processor?

A: The Intel chip wins the physics test with a score of 1278 versus 995, a 22.1% margin, and the prime number finding test with a score of 72 versus 57, a 20.8% margin.

Q: What are the memory bandwidth specifications for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel Core 5 211TE has a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s and supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: How does the L3 cache differ between the two processors?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE has 20 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has 4 MB of L3 cache.

Q: What are the process nodes and sockets for these processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 uses a 4 nm process from TSMC and fits in AMD Socket FP8. The Intel Core 5 211TE uses a 10 nm process from Intel and fits in Intel Socket 1700.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 5 PRO 435
5 211TE
Core Specs
Cores
6
10 +66.7%
Threads
12
16 +33.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
1.7 -15.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.5
4.8 +6.7%
Frequency (GHz)
2
1.7 -15.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.5
4.8 +6.7%
Multiplier
20
17 -15.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
4 MB
20 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
45 +60.7%
PL1
—
45 W
PL2
—
106 W
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
—
Codename
Gorgon Point
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Die Size
—
215 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
76.8 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 4, 14 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
2 + 4
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
2000 MHz up to 3.4 GHz
1300 MHz up to 3.4 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 840M
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$221
Part Number
100-000001788
SRQDL
Package
FP8
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 Details View Core 5 211TE Details