AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G vs Intel Core 5 213PE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data shows a decisive overall victory for the Intel Core 5 213PE, which wins 8 of the 11 shared tests, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G takes the remaining 3. The most lopsided result occurs in the prime number search workload, where the Intel chip scores 114 versus 58 for the AMD part, a 49.1% advantage. That result stands as the largest single-test margin in either direction, indicating a substantial lead in a workload that stresses latency-sensitive integer operations.

The Intel part also dominates in floating-point math, posting a score of 68587 against 50778 for the Ryzen, a 26% gap. Physics simulation shows a similar pattern, with Intel at 1624 versus 1022, a 37.1% lead. Single-thread performance goes to Intel by 17.1%, with scores of 4060 versus 3366, and the multi-threaded PassMark test also favors Intel, 26434 versus 23858, a 9.7% difference. Smaller Intel wins appear in data compression (298804 versus 295730, a 1% edge), integer math (92089 versus 90270, a 2% gap), and the overall multithread score.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G secures its wins in three specific areas. Data encryption shows a 22.2% advantage, with the AMD part scoring 19450 against 15916 for Intel. Extended instructions also favor AMD by 4.7%, at 20487 versus 19565, and random string sorting goes AMD's way by 2.3%, 32771 versus 32027. These results suggest that AMD retains a niche for cryptographic workloads and certain string manipulation tasks, while Intel holds the broader performance lead across most compute-heavy tests.

When placed against the broader database, the Intel Core 5 213PE sits at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35428. Its nearest rivals in the database are the Intel Core i7-13700T (35403, a 0.1% difference), the Intel Core i7-12700KF (35365, 0.2%), the Intel Core i5-13600T (35305, 0.3%), and the Intel Core i7-12700K (35287, 0.4%). These tight deltas place the Core 5 213PE in a cluster of previous-generation high-end parts, with performance that sits just above all four of those rivals.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, by contrast, occupies the 90th percentile with an average benchmark score of 49196, which is substantially higher than the Intel part's average. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (49228, a 0.1% difference), the Intel Core i5-14600KF (49394, 0.4% behind AMD), the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (48995, 0.4% ahead of AMD), and the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (48698, 1% behind AMD). The average score gap between the two processors is significant, with AMD ahead by roughly 37.5%, yet the head-to-head tests tell a different story, as Intel wins most individual workloads despite the lower aggregate.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge sharply in their underlying design. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G uses the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Cezanne, built on a 7 nm process from TSMC. It packs 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Intel Core 5 213PE, codenamed Bartlett Lake, uses a 10 nm Intel process and also offers 8 cores and 16 threads, but with a lower base clock of 2.70 GHz and a higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The higher boost clock explains the single-thread advantage seen in the benchmarks.

Cache configurations differ considerably. The AMD part provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a 16 MB L3 cache. The Intel part offers 80 KB of L1 per core, a much larger 2 MB of L2 per core, and a 24 MB shared L3 cache. The larger L2 and L3 caches on the Intel side likely contribute to its strong showing in prime number searches and floating-point math, where data locality matters. The AMD chip uses a dual-channel DDR4 memory bus with a measured bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 through a dual-channel bus rated at 76.8 GB/s, a 50% higher theoretical memory bandwidth.

Process node and foundry details also differ. AMD relies on TSMC's 7 nm process and lists 10,700 million transistors on a die size of 180 mm². Intel does not report transistor count or die size in the database, but its 10 nm process is a generation behind in node terminology. The AMD part uses AMD Socket AM4, while Intel uses Socket 1700. PCIe support also differs: AMD provides Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes, a major generational jump for high-bandwidth peripherals.

Integrated graphics separate the two as well. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G includes Radeon Vega 8 graphics, while the Intel Core 5 213PE pairs with UHD Graphics 730. Neither part supports ECC memory on the AMD side, but Intel explicitly lists ECC memory as supported, which could matter for certain workstation reliability scenarios. Both parts have their multipliers locked, so neither offers overclocking headroom. The AMD part's release date is recorded as September 2024, while Intel's is March 2026, making the Intel chip a later entry with a launch MSRP of $221.

The Verdict

The benchmark data points to a clear split between the two processors. The Intel Core 5 213PE wins the majority of the head-to-head tests, including the most demanding compute workloads: prime number search, floating-point math, physics simulation, single-thread, and multithread. Its higher boost clock and larger cache configuration align with those results. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, however, holds substantial leads in data encryption, extended instructions, and random string sorting, and its average benchmark score across the database is far higher at 49196 versus 35428.

That average score discrepancy requires interpretation. The AMD part's average includes results from a different set of tests than what appears in the head-to-head table, so the aggregate figure reflects a broader performance profile, not just the shared workloads. In the shared tests, the Intel chip wins by margins ranging from 1% to 49.1%, while AMD's wins span 2.3% to 22.2%. For users prioritizing raw compute throughput in physics, floating-point, and single-threaded tasks, the Intel part is the stronger choice. For users focused on encryption-heavy workloads and specific string-processing tasks, the AMD part holds a measurable edge.

The Intel chip also benefits from newer platform features: PCIe Gen 5, DDR5 support, and ECC memory capability, none of which appear on the AMD side. The AMD part counters with a smaller process node, a higher average benchmark score, and a socket that supports a wide range of existing AM4 boards. The choice depends on whether the workload aligns with Intel's strengths or AMD's niches.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-thread score?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE scores 4060 in the PassMark single-thread test, compared to 3366 for the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, a 17.1% lead for Intel.

Q: Does the AMD processor win any benchmark tests?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G wins three tests: data encryption (19450 versus 15916, a 22.2% lead), extended instructions (20487 versus 19565, a 4.7% lead), and random string sorting (32771 versus 32027, a 2.3% lead).

Q: What is the largest margin in any single test?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE wins the prime number search test by 49.1%, scoring 114 versus 58 for the AMD part.

Q: How do the memory support options differ?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G supports only DDR4 with a dual-channel bus rated at 51.2 GB/s. The Intel Core 5 213PE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus rated at 76.8 GB/s.

Q: Do both processors have the same core and thread counts?

A: Yes, both have 8 cores and 16 threads. However, the AMD part has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost of 4.60 GHz, while the Intel part has a base of 2.70 GHz and boost of 5.20 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE lists ECC memory support. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G does not list ECC support in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PE delivers its strongest results in compute-heavy, latency-sensitive workloads. The prime number search result (114 versus 58) and the physics score (1624 versus 1022) indicate a major advantage for integer and physics-based calculations. The floating-point math score (68587 versus 50778) adds a 26% lead for scientific or engineering-style number crunching. The single-thread score (4060 versus 3366) and multithread score (26434 versus 23858) confirm that Intel wins both across-the-board throughput and single-core responsiveness. For users running simulation software, physics engines, or mixed integer/floating-point workloads, the data favors Intel.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G wins in a narrower but distinct set of tasks. Data encryption (19450 versus 15916) shows a 22.2% edge, likely tied to the Zen 3 architecture's cryptographic instruction efficiency. Extended instructions (20487 versus 19565) provide a 4.7% advantage, and random string sorting (32771 versus 32027) adds a 2.3% lead. These wins indicate that AMD remains competitive for encryption, compression-related string handling, and workloads that use specialized instruction sets. The AMD part's higher average benchmark score (49196 versus 35428) also suggests that across the full database of tests, it holds a broader performance advantage than the head-to-head table alone would suggest.

The platform differences reinforce the split. Intel offers PCIe Gen 5, DDR5 support, and ECC memory, making it the better choice for users building a system around newer storage or memory standards. AMD counters with a 7 nm process, a 180 mm² die, and 10,700 million transistors, which may appeal to users prioritizing efficiency or compatibility with existing AM4 motherboards. The data does not show a single winner across every category; it shows two processors with complementary strengths, one dominant in raw compute and the other in specific instruction-level tasks.