AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G vs Intel Core i9-14901KE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G

CORE STATE Cezanne
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.8 Base / 4.6 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 3
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i9-14901KE

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.8 Base / 5.8 GHz Turbo
CACHE 36 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 125W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
295,730
N/A
passmark_data_encryption
19,450
N/A
passmark_extended_instructions
20,487
N/A
passmark_find_prime_numbers
58
N/A
passmark_floating_point_math
50,778
N/A
passmark_integer_math
90,270
N/A
passmark_multithread
23,858
N/A
passmark_physics
1,022
N/A
passmark_random_string_sorting
32,771
N/A
passmark_single_thread
3,366
N/A
passmark_singlethread
3,366
N/A

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G vs Intel Core i9-14901KE

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G and Intel Core i9-14901KE present a fascinating study in design philosophy. Both processors offer 8 cores and 16 threads, yet they are engineered for entirely different objectives. The AMD chip, built on the mature Zen 3 architecture, is a model of efficiency, while the Intel part, leveraging the Raptor Lake design, is focused on maximum performance headroom. The database records a complete benchmark profile for the AMD processor, while the Intel processor's benchmark array is empty, which shapes the analysis that follows. The data reveals a clear split in capabilities, driven by architectural choices rather than core counts.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is the clear winner in power efficiency and integrated graphics. Its 65W TDP is a stark contrast to the Intel chip's 125W TDP, making it the superior choice for compact systems and workstations where heat and energy draw are primary concerns. Its Radeon Vega 8 integrated graphics provide a functional visual output without a discrete GPU, a feature not matched by the Intel chip's UHD Graphics 770 in this comparison. The AMD processor also holds a significant advantage in process technology, using a 7nm node from TSMC versus Intel's 10nm node, which directly contributes to its lower power consumption and smaller die size of 180 mm².

The Intel Core i9-14901KE, on the other hand, wins decisively on raw performance potential and platform features. Its boost clock of 5.80 GHz is 1.20 GHz higher than the AMD's 4.60 GHz, indicating a substantial advantage in single-threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The Intel chip's cache hierarchy is also far more generous, with 2 MB of L2 cache per core (versus 512 KB) and a large 36 MB shared L3 cache (versus 16 MB). This larger cache pool, combined with PCIe Gen 5 support (versus Gen 3), positions the Intel processor for high-end gaming, content creation, and professional applications that demand rapid data access and high bandwidth. The Intel chip also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering greater flexibility, and includes ECC memory support, a feature absent on the AMD part.

The Verdict

The data suggests two distinct user profiles. For users building a low-power, space-constrained system, or those who prioritize energy efficiency and a robust integrated GPU for everyday tasks, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is the logical selection. Its 65W TDP, 7nm process, and Vega 8 graphics make it an excellent fit for home theater PCs, small form factor builds, or office workstations where quiet operation and low heat output are essential. The benchmark results for the AMD chip, including a Passmark multithread score of 23858 and a single-thread score of 3366, confirm its capability for general productivity, while its 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates strong overall performance relative to the broader market.

The Intel Core i9-14901KE is the choice for users who demand maximum performance and are willing to accept higher power consumption. Its 5.80 GHz boost clock, extensive cache, and PCIe Gen 5 support make it a more potent option for gaming, 3D rendering, video editing, and software compilation. The processor's 125W TDP is a clear indicator of its performance-oriented design, and the unlocked multiplier (a feature the AMD chip lacks) allows for overclocking to extract even more speed. While its benchmark scores are not recorded in the database, its architecture and specifications point to a high-performance part, despite its 50th percentile ranking, which is likely due to the absence of performance data.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database provides a comprehensive set of Passmark benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, offering a detailed look at its strengths. The Intel Core i9-14901KE has no recorded benchmarks, so a direct comparison of scores is not possible. However, the AMD chip's performance can be contextualized by its scores across various workloads.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G demonstrates its most impressive results in integer and floating-point math. Its Passmark integer math score of 90270 and floating-point math score of 50778 indicate robust computational throughput for scientific and engineering applications. Its data compression score of 295730 is exceptionally high, suggesting strong performance in file archiving and database tasks. The random string sorting score of 32771 also points to capable data handling. The physics score of 1022 and extended instructions score of 20487 round out a profile that is well-suited for a wide range of professional workloads.

The Intel chip's absence from the benchmark database leaves its raw scores unknown. The analysis must therefore rely on its architectural specifications, which are significantly more aggressive. The higher boost clock and larger caches suggest that it would likely outperform the AMD chip in single-threaded tasks and memory-intensive operations. The data encryption score for the AMD chip is 19450, and its find prime numbers score is a low 58, which is typical for such a test. These figures provide a baseline, but without Intel's scores, a direct head-to-head comparison is impossible. The Intel processor's 50th percentile ranking, despite its lack of data, suggests it is seen as an average performer in the database, a position that seems at odds with its high-end specifications.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901KE has a significantly higher boost clock of 5.80 GHz, compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G's 4.60 GHz.

Q: What are the TDP differences between the two chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G has a TDP of 65W, while the Intel Core i9-14901KE has a TDP of 125W, making the AMD chip substantially more power-efficient.

Q: Which CPU supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901KE supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G does not.

Q: What is the difference in L3 cache size?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901KE has a much larger 36 MB (shared) L3 cache, whereas the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G has 16 MB.

Q: Do both CPUs have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, both have integrated graphics. The AMD chip uses Radeon Vega 8, and the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 770.

Q: Which processor uses a more advanced manufacturing process?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G uses a 7nm process node from TSMC, which is more advanced than the Intel Core i9-14901KE's 10nm node from Intel.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is based on the Zen 3 architecture, with the codename Cezanne. It is a monolithic design fabricated on a 7nm process node by TSMC, with 10,700 million transistors on a die size of 180 mm². This architecture is known for its high instructions-per-clock (IPC) efficiency and power efficiency. Its cache hierarchy is configured per-core, with 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 cache, plus a shared 16 MB L3 cache.

The Intel Core i9-14901KE is based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake Refresh. It is fabricated on Intel's 10nm process node, with a larger die size of 257 mm². The architecture is more complex, featuring a hybrid design with a mix of performance and efficiency cores, although the database does not specify the core configuration. Its cache is also more generous, with 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 cache per core, plus a large 36 MB shared L3 cache. The process node difference is a key differentiator, with AMD's smaller node allowing for more transistors in a smaller area, while Intel's larger node and die size suggest a different design trade-off focused on higher clock speeds.

Specification Differences

The specification differences between the two CPUs are stark and define their respective use cases. The most obvious divergence is in power consumption, with the AMD chip rated at 65W TDP and the Intel chip at 125W TDP. This is directly linked to their process nodes and clock speeds. The AMD chip tops out at a 4.60 GHz boost clock, while the Intel chip reaches 5.80 GHz. Memory support also differs: the AMD chip supports only DDR4, while the Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The memory bandwidth for the AMD chip is listed as 51.2 GB/s, while no figure is given for the Intel chip.

PCIe support is another major difference. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G uses PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes, while the Intel Core i9-14901KE uses the much faster PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The Intel chip also offers ECC memory support, which is absent on the AMD part. The AMD chip has an unlocked multiplier set to false, meaning it cannot be overclocked, while the Intel chip has an unlocked multiplier set to true, enabling overclocking. The sockets are incompatible: AMD uses Socket AM4, while Intel uses Socket 1700. The release dates also differ, with the Intel processor released on 2024-06-30, and the AMD processor released on 2024-09-04. The die sizes reflect the architectural complexity, with the Intel chip at 257 mm² and the AMD chip at 180 mm².

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
7 PRO 5755G
i9-14901KE
Core Specs
Cores
8
8 0.0%
Threads
16
16 0.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.8
3.8 0.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.6
5.8 +26.1%
Frequency (GHz)
3.8
3.8 0.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.6
5.8 +26.1%
Multiplier
38
38 0.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB
36 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
65
125 +92.3%
PL1
—
125 W
PL2
—
253 W
PPT
88 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 3
Raptor Lake
Codename
Cezanne
Raptor Lake-R
Generation
Ryzen 7 (Zen 3 (Cezanne))
Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
7 nm
10 nm
Transistors
10,700 million
—
Die Size
180 mm²
257 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
51.2 GB/s
—
ECC Memory
No
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
—
5600 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM4
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 Series
PCIe
Gen 3, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon Vega 8
UHD Graphics 770
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Part Number
100-000001748
Q49DSRNJC
Package
µOPGA-1331
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
—
100°C
Bundled Cooler
—
None
View Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G Details View Core i9-14901KE Details