AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS vs Intel Core i9-14901KE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS and Intel Core i9-14901KE serve different market segments, and the benchmark data confirms a clear performance hierarchy. The Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS is a mobile processor with a 45 W TDP, while the Core i9-14901KE is a desktop processor with a 125 W TDP. The recorded data shows the Ryzen part has a substantial lead in the average benchmark score, posting 30,879 points, while the Intel part has no recorded average benchmark score in the database. This difference in available data shapes the analysis, but the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS’s position in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs demonstrates its strong standing, whereas the Core i9-14901KE sits in the 50th percentile.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS and Intel Core i9-14901KE, so direct comparison of identical test runs is not possible. However, the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS has a full suite of recorded scores, while the Core i9-14901KE has none. This means all quantitative conclusions about the Intel part’s performance must be inferred from its specification profile rather than measured results.

Focusing on the available Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS data, its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19,742 points is its strongest multi-threaded result, while the single-core score of 2,787 points indicates solid per-thread performance. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score drops to 8,291 points and the single-core score to 1,170 points. The Cinebench R15 results show 1,989 points multicore and 280 points single-core. These scores are consistent with a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 mobile processor.

PassMark results for the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS further illustrate its capabilities. The multithread score of 23,569 and the single-thread score of 3,858 indicate balanced performance across workloads. In specific PassMark tests, the data compression score of 265,826 is notably high, while encryption scores 17,387, extended instructions score 21,212, and the find prime numbers test scores 73. Floating point math scores 45,481, integer math scores 72,740, and random string sorting scores 35,472. Physics performance records 1,208 points.

Since the Intel Core i9-14901KE has no benchmark scores in the database, its relative performance cannot be quantified against the AMD part. The nearest rivals to the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS provide context: the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F scores 30,746 (0.4% lower), the Intel Core i7-13700TE scores 31,028 (0.5% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS scores 31,074 (0.6% higher), and the Intel Core i7-12700F scores 31,081 (0.6% higher). These deltas place the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS within a tight cluster of similarly performing processors.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS is the only one of the two with measured performance results, giving it a clear analytical advantage. Its 82nd percentile ranking among all CPUs and average benchmark score of 30,879 establish it as a capable mobile processor. The Intel Core i9-14901KE, with no recorded benchmarks and a 50th percentile ranking, cannot be verified as faster or slower based on the database.

For a mobile workload, the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS delivers verified multi-threaded and single-threaded performance across Cinebench and PassMark tests. Its 6-core, 12-thread configuration with a 5.00 GHz boost clock supports this. The Intel part offers 8 cores and 16 threads with a higher 5.80 GHz boost clock, but without measured scores, its real-world standing remains unconfirmed in the database.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS is the pick for anyone needing confirmed performance data in a mobile form factor. The Core i9-14901KE is a desktop part with a higher core count and clock speed, but the absence of benchmark results means its advantages are speculative. The recorded data favors the AMD processor solely because it has scores, and the Intel processor has none.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS have a higher average benchmark score than the Intel Core i9-14901KE?

A: Yes. The Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS records an average benchmark score of 30,879, while the Core i9-14901KE has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS ranks in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core i9-14901KE ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core i9-14901KE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock speed for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Core i9-14901KE has a boost clock of 5.80 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a higher TDP?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901KE has a TDP of 125 W, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS’s TDP of 45 W.

Q: Are there any head-to-head benchmark results for these two processors?

A: No. The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS and Intel Core i9-14901KE.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several core specifications. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core i9-14901KE has 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are 4.30 GHz for the AMD part and 3.80 GHz for the Intel part, while boost clocks are 5.00 GHz and 5.80 GHz, respectively. TDP differs substantially: 45 W for the AMD processor versus 125 W for the Intel processor. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. The market segments are also distinct, with the AMD processor classified as Mobile and the Intel processor as Desktop. The Intel Core i9-14901KE has an unlocked multiplier, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS does not. The release dates are 2024-04-15 for the AMD part and 2024-06-30 for the Intel part. The AMD part number is 100-000001315(FP7r2),100-000001388(FP7), while the Intel part number is Q49DSRNJC.

Architecture Differences

The architecture of the two processors reflects different design approaches. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS uses the Zen 4 architecture with the codename Hawk Point, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i9-14901KE uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-R, fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD die size is 178 mm² with 25,000 million transistors, while the Intel die size is 257 mm² with no transistor count recorded. Cache configurations differ in capacity and structure. The AMD L1 cache is 64 KB per core, L2 is 1 MB per core, and L3 is 16 MB shared. The Intel L1 cache is 80 KB per core, L2 is 2 MB per core, and L3 is 36 MB shared. Memory support differs: the AMD processor supports DDR5 only, while the Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses, but the AMD processor records a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel processor has no recorded memory bandwidth. Both support ECC memory. PCIe capabilities also differ, with the AMD processor using Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only) and the Intel processor using Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics are the Radeon 760M for the AMD part and UHD Graphics 770 for the Intel part. The AMD processor uses the Hawk Point codename and is part of the 8000 series, while the Intel processor uses Raptor Lake Refresh and belongs to Core 14th Gen.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS wins in the database because it has measured performance data, while the Intel Core i9-14901KE has none. The AMD part’s verified scores across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and PassMark tests give it a concrete analytical presence. Its 82nd percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 30,879 are recorded facts. The Intel part’s 50th percentile ranking and zero average score indicate no confirmed wins in any benchmark category.

The AMD processor is suited to mobile computing, with a 45 W TDP and a 4 nm process node. Its 6-core, 12-thread configuration with a 5.00 GHz boost clock delivers recorded multi-threaded scores such as 19,742 in Cinebench R23 and 23,569 in PassMark multithread. Single-thread performance is also recorded at 3,858 in PassMark and 2,787 in Cinebench R23. The Intel processor, as a desktop part with a 125 W TDP and 8 cores, 16 threads, offers a higher 5.80 GHz boost clock and a larger 36 MB L3 cache, but these are unverified by any benchmark scores. The larger cache and higher core count suggest potential strength in multi-threaded desktop workloads, but the database cannot confirm this. The AMD processor’s recorded wins in every benchmark category it appears in stand as the only measurable outcomes.