AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS vs Intel Core i5-14501TE Comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS
Core i5-14501TE
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS vs Intel Core i5-14501TE
The Verdict
The recorded data shows two distinctly positioned processors rather than direct equivalents. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS belongs to the 8000 series mobile lineup, built on Zen 4 architecture at TSMC's 4 nm node, and it carries a rich benchmark history. The Intel Core i5-14501TE is a Raptor Lake Refresh desktop part on Intel's 10 nm process, and the database contains no benchmark scores or head-to-head results for it. Consequently, the AMD part stands as the only unit with measured performance data. The Intel part's percentile rank of 50 places it at the midpoint of all CPUs in the database, while the AMD part reaches the 82nd percentile. For workload projections, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS delivers measurable results across single-thread, multi-thread, and specialized instruction tests. The Intel Core i5-14501TE cannot be assessed with the same confidence because no empirical scores exist in the database. Any selection between the two must therefore rely on the AMD part's verified outputs and the Intel part's architectural specifications alone.
Architecture Differences
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS uses the Zen 4 microarchitecture under the Hawk Point codename, manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process. The die measures 178 mm² and contains 25,000 million transistors. The Intel Core i5-14501TE uses Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-R codename, built by Intel on a 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². The transistor count for the Intel part is not recorded. Both processors present six cores and twelve threads, and both carry a 45 W TDP. The AMD part's base clock sits at 4.30 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the Intel part operates at a 2.20 GHz base clock and a 5.10 GHz boost clock. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP7, and the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700.
Cache layouts differ noticeably. The AMD part allocates 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part allocates 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger per-core L1 and L2 allocations on the Intel side, along with the larger shared L3, suggest a different cache hierarchy design. Memory support also splits: the AMD processor supports DDR5 only with dual-channel memory and a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory, though its memory bandwidth is not recorded. Both support ECC memory. PCIe capabilities differ as well. The AMD part provides Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, while the Intel part provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics differ: the AMD part uses Radeon 760M, and the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 770. The AMD part belongs to the mobile segment, while the Intel part belongs to the desktop segment. The AMD release date is recorded as 2024-04-15, and the Intel release date is recorded as 2024-06-30.
Where Each One Wins
Because the Intel Core i5-14501TE has no recorded benchmark scores, the victory analysis rests entirely on the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS results and on architectural comparisons. The AMD part demonstrates strong multi-threaded throughput in the recorded data. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 19,742; in Cinebench R20 multi-core, it scores 8,291; and in Cinebench R15 multi-core, it scores 1,989. The PassMark multi-thread score reaches 23,569, and the average benchmark score stands at 30,879. The AMD processor also shows solid single-thread capability with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,787, a Cinebench R20 single-core score of 1,170, and a Cinebench R15 single-core score of 280. PassMark single-thread reports 3,858.
Specialized workloads further favor the AMD part. PassMark data compression scores 265,826, data encryption scores 17,387, extended instructions score 21,212, floating point math scores 45,481, and integer math scores 72,740. Random string sorting reaches 35,472, and physics simulation scores 1,208. Prime number finding scores 73. The AMD part's percentile rank of 82 confirms that it sits above the large majority of CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F with an average score of 30,746 and a delta of 0.4%, the Intel Core i7-13700TE with an average score of 31,028 and a delta of -0.5%, the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS with an average score of 31,074 and a delta of -0.6%, and the Intel Core i7-12700F with an average score of 31,081 and a delta of -0.6%. These deltas show that the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS lands within about half a percent of four other processors, making it a tightly competitive mid-range part.
The Intel Core i5-14501TE can claim wins only on paper. Its boost clock of 5.10 GHz exceeds the AMD part's 5.00 GHz boost clock by 0.10 GHz. Its cache hierarchy is larger in L1, L2, and L3 capacities. Its PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 CPU lanes offers a newer generation than the AMD part's PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. Its support for DDR4 alongside DDR5 gives it broader memory compatibility. Its integrated UHD Graphics 770 differs from the Radeon 760M, but no graphics benchmark data exists to determine a winner. The Intel part's percentile rank of 50 indicates a median position among all CPUs, but with no average benchmark score recorded, this rank cannot be tied to any specific performance measurement.
FAQ
Q: Which processor shows higher multi-threaded performance in the recorded data?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS is the only one with recorded multi-threaded scores. It scores 19,742 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 8,291 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, and 1,989 in Cinebench R15 multi-core. The Intel Core i5-14501TE has no recorded multi-threaded benchmark results.
Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The AMD part's average benchmark score is 30,879. The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F scores 30,746, which is 0.4% lower. The Intel Core i7-13700TE scores 31,028, which is 0.5% higher. The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS scores 31,074, which is 0.6% higher. The Intel Core i7-12700F scores 31,081, which is 0.6% higher. The AMD part sits within a narrow band around all four rivals.
Q: What are the core and thread counts for both processors?
A: Both the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS and the Intel Core i5-14501TE have six cores and twelve threads.
Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?
A: Yes. The database records ECC memory support as true for both the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS and the Intel Core i5-14501TE.
Q: What memory types does each processor support?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS supports DDR5 only with dual-channel memory and a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core i5-14501TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory, but its memory bandwidth is not recorded.
Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?
A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel part leads by 0.10 GHz.
Q: What is the production status of each processor?
A: Both processors are recorded as Active in production status.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The head-to-head benchmark table is empty in the database, so no direct side-by-side measurements exist. The comparison must instead use the AMD part's individual scores and the Intel part's absence of scores. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19,742, a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 8,291, and a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1,989. These multi-core results establish a clear performance baseline for the AMD part. The Intel Core i5-14501TE has no corresponding scores, so multi-core comparison is impossible.
In single-thread tests, the AMD part scores 2,787 in Cinebench R23, 1,170 in Cinebench R20, and 280 in Cinebench R15. PassMark single-thread reports 3,858. The Intel part has no single-thread scores in the database. The AMD part's PassMark integer math score of 72,740 and floating point math score of 45,481 further characterize its computational profile. Data compression at 265,826 and data encryption at 17,387 show strong throughput in those specific workloads. Extended instructions score 21,212, random string sorting scores 35,472, physics simulation scores 1,208, and prime number finding scores 73.
The AMD part's average benchmark score of 30,879 places it at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rival deltas show a tight cluster: the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F trails by 0.4%, the Intel Core i7-13700TE leads by 0.5%, the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS leads by 0.6%, and the Intel Core i7-12700F leads by 0.6%. These small percentage differences indicate that the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS performs at a level comparable to several higher-tier parts, despite its six-core, twelve-thread configuration.
The Intel Core i5-14501TE holds a 50th percentile rank among all CPUs, but with an average benchmark score of 0 and no nearest rivals listed, the database treats it as unmeasured. Its architecture offers a 5.10 GHz boost clock, 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, 24 MB shared L3, PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, and DDR4 plus DDR5 support. The AMD part offers a 5.00 GHz boost clock, 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, 16 MB shared L3, PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, and DDR5 support. The AMD part uses a 4 nm TSMC process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The Intel part uses a 10 nm Intel process on a 215 mm² die with no recorded transistor count.
The absence of Intel benchmark data means the only measurable wins belong to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS. The AMD part shows verified performance across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 in both single-core and multi-core tests, plus a broad set of PassMark workload scores. The Intel part's case rests on architectural specifications: higher boost clock, larger cache hierarchy, newer PCIe generation, and broader memory support. The recorded data cannot confirm whether those specifications translate into benchmark wins, because the database holds no Intel scores. The AMD part's percentile rank of 82 versus the Intel part's 50 provides the only direct ranking comparison, and it favors AMD.