AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS vs Intel Core i5-14501E Comparison

# AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS vs Intel Core i5-14501E

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS and Intel Core i5-14501E are both 6-core, 12-thread processors, but they target different market segments and use different architectures. The Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS is a mobile processor from AMD's 8000 series, built on Zen 4 architecture (Hawk Point codename) using a 4 nm process from TSMC. The Core i5-14501E is a desktop processor from Intel's Core 14th Gen series, built on Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-R codename) using a 10 nm process from Intel. The database contains extensive benchmark data for the AMD part, while the Intel part currently has no recorded benchmark scores. This asymmetry shapes the analysis, though specification and architectural differences provide meaningful comparison points.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data shows the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS with a full suite of recorded scores across Cinebench and PassMark tests. The Intel Core i5-14501E has no benchmark entries in the database, so direct performance comparisons must rely on the AMD part's absolute scores and its percentile placement. The Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS sits at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 30879. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F at 30746 (0.4% higher), the Intel Core i7-13700TE at 31028 (0.5% lower), the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS at 31074 (0.6% lower), and the Intel Core i7-12700F at 31081 (0.6% lower). This placement indicates the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS performs within a tight band of these comparable processors, despite being a mobile part.

In single-threaded workloads, the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS achieves a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2787 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3858. Its boost clock of 5.00 GHz helps drive these results. For multi-threaded tasks, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score reaches 19742, while PassMark multi-thread score is 23569. The PassMark suite also shows strengths in specific workloads: data compression at 265826, floating point math at 45481, integer math at 72740, and extended instructions at 21212. The random string sorting score of 35472 and find prime numbers score of 73 round out the computational profile.

The Intel Core i5-14501E, with its higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz, may offer a slight advantage in bursty single-threaded scenarios, but no benchmark data exists to confirm this. The Intel part also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which could benefit certain workloads requiring high-bandwidth peripheral connectivity. However, without recorded scores, the Intel part cannot claim any measured wins in the database.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS has an average benchmark score of 30879 across all recorded tests. The Intel Core i5-14501E has an average benchmark score of 0, as no benchmark entries exist in the database for this part.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS is 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F, 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13700TE, 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, and 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12700F, based on average benchmark scores.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS ranks at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs in the database. The Intel Core i5-14501E ranks at the 50th percentile, though this is based on no recorded benchmark data.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: Both processors support ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS and the Intel Core i5-14501E both list ECC memory support as true in their specifications.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS supports DDR5 memory only. The Intel Core i5-14501E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, providing more flexibility in memory selection.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14501E uses a 10 nm process node from Intel.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two processors, and the Intel Core i5-14501E has no individual benchmark scores recorded. Therefore, the analysis must focus on the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS's absolute performance metrics and its placement relative to other CPUs in the database.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19742, which places it in the upper echelon of mobile processors. Its Cinebench R20 multi-core score is 8291, and its Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 1989. These scores scale consistently across Cinebench versions, indicating stable multi-threaded performance. The single-core scores follow a similar pattern: Cinebench R23 single-core at 2787, Cinebench R20 single-core at 1170, and Cinebench R15 single-core at 280. The gap between multi-core and single-core scores suggests the processor scales well with thread count, as expected for a 6-core, 12-thread part.

In PassMark tests, the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS shows strengths in data compression with a score of 265826, which is substantially higher than its scores in other PassMark workloads. This suggests the processor handles compression algorithms efficiently, likely benefiting from its Zen 4 architecture and cache hierarchy. The floating point math score of 45481 and integer math score of 72740 indicate balanced performance across different arithmetic workloads. The extended instructions score of 21212 reflects the processor's ability to handle SIMD and specialized instruction sets. The physics score of 1208 and random string sorting score of 35472 complete the PassMark profile.

The nearest rival comparisons show the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS holds its own against desktop and higher-tier mobile processors. The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F leads by 0.4%, a margin within measurement noise. The Intel Core i7-13700TE trails by 0.5%, the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS trails by 0.6%, and the Intel Core i7-12700F trails by 0.6%. These small deltas indicate the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS competes effectively despite its mobile form factor.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS has a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14501E has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Intel part has a higher boost clock by 0.20 GHz, but the AMD part has a significantly higher base clock by 1.00 GHz. This suggests the AMD processor maintains higher sustained performance at lower power, while the Intel processor can reach higher peak frequencies under boost conditions.

The thermal design power (TDP) differs substantially: the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Intel Core i5-14501E has a TDP of 65 watts. The AMD part consumes less power, which is consistent with its mobile market segment. The Intel part targets desktop use, where higher power draw is more acceptable.

The sockets differ: the AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700. These sockets are incompatible, meaning the processors cannot be swapped between platforms.

Memory support differs: the AMD processor supports DDR5 only, while the Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD processor has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel processor has no recorded memory bandwidth in the database. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

PCIe support differs: the AMD processor uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part offers a newer PCIe generation, which provides higher bandwidth per lane, but the AMD part offers more total lanes.

The integrated graphics differ: the AMD processor includes Radeon 760M, while the Intel processor includes UHD Graphics 770. Neither processor has a recorded benchmark score for graphics performance in the database.

The release dates differ: the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS was released on 2024-04-15, while the Intel Core i5-14501E was released on 2024-06-30. Both processors remain in active production status.

Neither processor has a launch MSRP recorded in the database. Both processors have locked multipliers, meaning they cannot be overclocked.

Architecture Differences

The architectural differences between these processors are substantial. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS uses Zen 4 architecture with the codename Hawk Point, part of the Ryzen 5 generation. The Intel Core i5-14501E uses Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-R, part of the Core i5 generation (Raptor Lake Refresh).

The process nodes differ dramatically: the AMD processor uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel processor uses a 10 nm process from Intel. The AMD part also records 25,000 million transistors on a die size of 178 mm². The Intel part has no transistor count recorded, but its die size is 215 mm². The smaller process node and smaller die size for the AMD part suggest higher transistor density, which typically enables better power efficiency and potentially higher performance per watt.

Cache hierarchies differ: the AMD processor has 64 KB L1 cache per core, 1 MB L2 cache per core, and 16 MB shared L3 cache. The Intel processor has 80 KB L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB L2 cache per core, and 24 MB shared L3 cache. The Intel part has larger caches at every level, which could benefit workloads with high cache utilization. However, the AMD processor's Zen 4 architecture may use its smaller caches more efficiently.

The memory bandwidth differs: the AMD processor records 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel processor has no recorded value. This suggests the AMD part has a defined memory bandwidth capability, while the Intel part's memory bandwidth remains unmeasured in the database.

The market segments differ: the AMD processor targets mobile devices, while the Intel processor targets desktop systems. This distinction influences design choices, including TDP, socket, and integrated graphics. The AMD part's 45 W TDP suits thin-and-light laptops, while the Intel part's 65 W TDP suits desktop towers where cooling is less constrained.

The part numbers differ: the AMD processor has part numbers 100-000001315 (FP7r2) and 100-000001388 (FP7), while the Intel processor has part number Q49HSRNJM. These identifiers confirm the distinct manufacturing batches and platform compatibility.

The Verdict

The database provides a clear picture for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS, with comprehensive benchmark scores and a strong percentile ranking. Its average benchmark score of 30879 places it at the 82nd percentile, and its nearest rivals all fall within a 1% range. The processor demonstrates capable multi-threaded performance with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19742 and strong single-threaded performance with a score of 2787. Its 45 W TDP makes it suitable for mobile devices, and its 4 nm process node from TSMC suggests efficient power delivery.

The Intel Core i5-14501E lacks recorded benchmark scores, so no performance conclusions can be drawn from the database. Its specification differences, including a higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz, larger caches (24 MB L3), and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, may offer advantages in specific scenarios. Its PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes could benefit users requiring high-bandwidth expansion. However, the absence of benchmark data means these potential advantages remain unverified.

For users choosing between these processors, the decision depends on platform requirements. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS suits mobile systems where power efficiency and compact design matter. The Intel Core i5-14501E suits desktop systems where higher TDP and newer PCIe generation are acceptable. The AMD processor has a higher base clock, while the Intel processor has a higher boost clock. The AMD processor supports DDR5 only, while the Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD processor uses PCIe Gen 4, while the Intel processor uses PCIe Gen 5.

The data does not indicate a clear winner because the Intel part has no measured performance. The AMD part's benchmark scores show it competes with desktop processors like the Intel Core i7-12700F and AMD Ryzen 7 8700F, despite being a mobile part. The Intel part's specifications suggest it could perform well, but the database lacks evidence. Users should consider their platform needs and wait for benchmark data before making a final decision.