AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Processor U301L Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS and Intel Processor U301L occupy distinctly different positions in the database. The AMD part records a substantial set of benchmark scores, while the Intel Processor U301L has no recorded benchmark entries, which prevents direct head-to-head comparisons. The data available for the Ryzen 5 7533HS places it at the 73rd percentile of all CPUs, whereas the Intel Processor U301L sits at the 50th percentile, a gap that reflects the absence of measured performance data for the latter.

The Ryzen 5 7533HS delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12342 and a single-core score of 1742. Its Cinebench R20 results show 5183 multi-core and 731 single-core, while Cinebench R15 records 1243 multi-core and 175 single-core. These scores indicate a processor capable of strong sustained multi-threaded work, with the multi-core to single-core ratio suggesting efficient scaling across its six cores and twelve threads.

PassMark results for the Ryzen 5 7533HS reinforce this profile. The multi-thread score reaches 14520, while single-thread performance lands at 2740. Integer math scores 50800, floating point math 27800, and extended instructions 11219. Data compression completes at 168692, data encryption at 10718, and random string sorting at 17669. Physics simulation records 821, and prime number finding yields 48.

The Intel Processor U301L, by contrast, has no benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and it has no nearest rivals recorded. This makes any direct numeric comparison impossible. The only measurable points of differentiation come from specifications and the percentile rankings, which are based on the database's full CPU population.

The Ryzen 5 7533HS's nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V with an average score of 19368 and a delta of 0 percent, the Intel Core i5-1345U at 19411 with a delta of -0.2 percent, the Intel Core i7-8700K at 19238 with a delta of 0.7 percent, and the Intel Core i7-10700F at 19499 with a delta of -0.7 percent. These deltas place the Ryzen 5 7533HS within a tight performance band around its immediate competitors, with its average benchmark score of 19364 sitting nearly level with the Core Ultra 5 226V.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 5 7533HS wins every measurable performance category by default, since the Intel Processor U301L has no recorded scores. The Ryzen part's multi-threaded workloads show particular strength. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12342, combined with a PassMark multi-thread score of 14520, indicates that applications leveraging multiple cores will see the most benefit. The 12 threads allow parallel task execution across rendering, compilation, and data processing workloads.

Single-thread performance on the Ryzen 5 7533HS is likewise solid, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1742 and a PassMark single-thread score of 2740. This matters for applications that rely on per-core performance, such as legacy software or lightly threaded productivity tools. The database shows no scenario where the Intel Processor U301L outperforms the Ryzen part, because no scenario is measured.

The Intel Processor U301L does offer a lower thermal design point of 15 watts compared to the Ryzen 5 7533HS's 35 watts. For systems where thermal output and power draw are primary constraints, the Intel part's lower TDP could be the deciding factor, although no benchmark data confirms what performance level that 15-watt envelope delivers. The Ryzen part's 35-watt TDP suggests it is designed for a performance-oriented mobile segment, while the Intel part targets efficiency-focused designs.

The Ryzen 5 7533HS also supports DDR5 memory exclusively with a dual-channel bus and 76.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The Intel Processor U301L supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, but the database does not list its memory bandwidth. This makes the Ryzen part's memory throughput a documented advantage, while the Intel part's flexibility in memory type selection could suit platforms already using DDR4.

Architecture Differences

The Ryzen 5 7533HS uses AMD's Zen 3+ architecture under the Rembrandt-R codename, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It integrates six cores and twelve threads, with base and boost clocks of 3.30 GHz and 4.40 GHz respectively. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The die size measures 208 mm². It supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU and includes Radeon 660M integrated graphics. The socket is AMD Socket FP7, and the part number is listed as 100-000001632(FP7) and 100-000001634(FP7r2).

The Intel Processor U301L uses Intel's Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-PS codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel. It has five cores and six threads, with base and boost clocks of 1.20 GHz and 2.20 GHz. Cache allocation differs: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part supports PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU and includes UHD Graphics 64EU. It uses Intel Socket 1700, and the part number is SRPKFQ5CW.

The process node difference is notable: 6 nm on the AMD side versus 10 nm on the Intel side. This contributes to the Ryzen part's higher clock speeds, as it reaches 4.40 GHz boost versus the Intel part's 2.20 GHz boost. The AMD part also has more threads, 12 versus 6, and more L3 cache, 16 MB versus 8 MB. The Intel part has more L2 cache per core at 1.25 MB versus 512 KB, which could benefit certain localized data access patterns, though no benchmark data confirms this.

Both parts are mobile market segments and are marked as active in production. Neither has an unlocked multiplier. The Ryzen 5 7533HS was released on 2024-08-31, while the Intel Processor U301L was released on 2024-04-07. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $107, while the AMD part has no launch MSRP listed in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Processor U301L has 5 cores and 6 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS boosts to 4.40 GHz. The Intel Processor U301L boosts to 2.20 GHz.

Q: Do these processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS supports DDR5 only, with a dual-channel bus and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Processor U301L supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, but its memory bandwidth is not listed in the database.

Q: What integrated graphics do they use?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS uses Radeon 660M. The Intel Processor U301L uses UHD Graphics 64EU.

Q: What are the thermal design points?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a TDP of 35 watts. The Intel Processor U301L has a TDP of 15 watts.

Q: Why is there no direct benchmark comparison between the two?

A: The Intel Processor U301L has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so its average benchmark score is 0 and no direct numeric comparison is possible. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a full set of Cinebench and PassMark scores.

The Verdict

The data supports choosing the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS for any workload where measured performance matters. It delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12342, a single-core score of 1742, and a PassMark multi-thread score of 14520. Its 6 cores, 12 threads, 4.40 GHz boost clock, and 16 MB of L3 cache position it as a capable mobile processor, and its 73rd percentile ranking places it above the Intel Processor U301L's 50th percentile.

The Intel Processor U301L cannot be recommended on the basis of performance data, because the database contains none. Its advantages are structural: a 15-watt TDP, support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and a launch MSRP of $107. Systems constrained by power budgets or already committed to DDR4 memory platforms might select it for those reasons alone. The Ryzen 5 7533HS offers no such flexibility, supporting only DDR5 and drawing 35 watts.

For users prioritizing raw compute throughput, the Ryzen 5 7533HS is the only option with evidence in the database. Its nearest rivals, including the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V at 19368 average score and the Intel Core i7-10700F at 19499, all sit within a narrow band of the Ryzen part's 19364 average, confirming it competes at a high level. The Intel Processor U301L's lack of recorded scores leaves its performance profile entirely unverified in this database.