AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Processor N250 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data splits these two mobile processors into completely different performance tiers. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS delivers a full set of benchmark scores across Cinebench and PassMark suites, while the Intel Processor N250 has no recorded benchmark entries in the database. The AMD part holds an average benchmark score of 19,364 across its tested workloads, placing it at the 73rd percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Processor N250 sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of zero, which reflects the absence of measured results rather than a literal performance of zero.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS wins every measurable category by default, simply because it is the only one of the two with scores on record. Within its own results, the Ryzen part shows a clear profile. Multi-threaded workloads are its strongest area. Cinebench R23 multi-core returns 12,342 points, Cinebench R20 multi-core returns 5,183, and Cinebench R15 multi-core returns 1,243. PassMark multi-thread adds 14,520 points, with integer math at 50,800 and floating-point math at 27,800. Those numbers point to a processor built for sustained parallel work.

Single-thread performance is comparatively more modest but still solid. Cinebench R23 single-core scores 1,742, R20 single-core scores 731, and R15 single-core scores 175. PassMark single-thread lands at 2,740. The gap between the multi-core and single-core results is large, which is expected for a 6-core, 12-thread part with a 4.40 GHz boost clock.

Specialized workloads show additional strengths. PassMark data compression returns 168,692, a very high figure that indicates strong integer throughput. Random string sorting scores 17,669, and extended instructions score 11,219. Data encryption returns 10,718. Physics simulation scores 821, and prime number finding returns 48. The pattern is consistent: the Ryzen 5 7533HS is a capable all-rounder with an emphasis on multi-threaded and data-heavy tasks.

The Intel Processor N250 has no wins to claim from benchmark data. Its specifications suggest a low-power design with 4 cores, 4 threads, a 6 W TDP, and a boost clock of 3.80 GHz, but without recorded scores, any performance claims would be speculative. The database simply has no measurements for it.

The Verdict

The data supports one clear conclusion: the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is the stronger processor by every measured metric. It holds a 73rd percentile ranking across all CPUs, while the Intel Processor N250 holds a 50th percentile ranking. The Ryzen part has 6 cores and 12 threads against the Intel part's 4 cores and 4 threads. The Ryzen boost clock reaches 4.40 GHz versus 3.80 GHz for the Intel part. The Ryzen TDP is 35 W versus 6 W, which explains the performance gap but also points to different intended use cases.

For users who need actual benchmark-verified performance, the Ryzen 5 7533HS is the only choice with data backing it. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,342 and PassMark multi-thread score of 14,520 place it in a different class than a 4-thread processor. The Intel Processor N250 would be selected only in scenarios where the 6 W TDP is the deciding factor, such as fanless or ultra-low-power designs, but no benchmark evidence exists to quantify what it delivers in those conditions.

The comparison is asymmetric. The Ryzen part is a mainstream mobile chip from AMD's 7000 series with Zen 3+ architecture on a 6 nm node. The Intel part is a low-end entry from Intel's Twin Lake architecture on a 10 nm node. The database records no head-to-head benchmark results and no wins for either side, so the verdict rests entirely on the Ryzen part's measured scores and the Intel part's absence of them.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

There are no head-to-head benchmark entries in the database for these two processors. The wins count is zero for both the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS and the Intel Processor N250. That means no direct comparison tests were recorded, and the analysis must rely on the individual benchmark suites available for the AMD part.

Within the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS results, the most decisive numbers come from multi-core tests. Cinebench R23 multi-core returns 12,342, which is more than seven times the single-core score of 1,742. Cinebench R20 multi-core returns 5,183 against 731 single-core. Cinebench R15 multi-core returns 1,243 against 175 single-core. These ratios show the processor scales effectively across its 12 threads.

PassMark results reinforce the same picture. Multi-thread scores 14,520, while single-thread scores 2,740. Integer math at 50,800 is nearly double floating-point math at 27,800, indicating strong general-purpose compute. Data compression at 168,692 is the standout result, more than ten times the encryption score of 10,718. Random string sorting at 17,669 and extended instructions at 11,219 round out the specialized workload results.

The nearest rivals in the database for the Ryzen 5 7533HS provide context. The Intel Core Ultra 5 226V averages 19,368, essentially identical with a delta of 0 percent. The Intel Core i5-1345U averages 19,411, which is 0.2 percent higher. The Intel Core i7-8700K averages 19,238, which is 0.7 percent lower. The Intel Core i7-10700F averages 19,499, which is 0.7 percent higher. These deltas are all within 1 percent, meaning the Ryzen 5 7533HS sits squarely in a competitive cluster of mid-range processors. It is neither a standout nor an outlier among its nearest measured peers.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, while the Intel Processor N250 has a boost clock of 3.80 GHz.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Processor N250 has 4 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a TDP of 35 W. The Intel Processor N250 has a TDP of 6 W, which is significantly lower.

Q: Does the Intel Processor N250 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database contains no benchmark entries for the Intel Processor N250. Its average benchmark score is listed as zero, and it has no nearest rivals recorded.

Q: What is the performance percentile for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is at the 73rd percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Processor N250 is at the 50th percentile.

Q: Which processor supports more memory channels?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS supports dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel Processor N250 supports single-channel memory with a bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the codename Rembrandt-R, part of the 7000 series. It is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 208 mm². The Intel Processor N250 uses the Twin Lake architecture under the same codename, part of the Intel Processor generation based on Alder Lake-N. It is built on a 10 nm process at Intel, with no die size recorded.

Cache layouts differ substantially. The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has 96 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of shared L2 cache, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part therefore offers more total cache, especially at the L3 level, which supports its larger thread count.

Memory support diverges as well. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Processor N250 supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 memory but only in a single-channel configuration with 38.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The AMD part has double the memory bandwidth on paper.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The AMD part provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part provides PCIe Gen 3 with 9 lanes from the CPU. The AMD part offers a newer generation and more lanes, which matters for storage and expansion options.

Neither processor supports ECC memory, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. Both target the mobile market segment and are listed as active in production. The integrated graphics differ: the AMD part uses Radeon 660M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 730.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field in the database.

Core and thread counts: the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Processor N250 has 4 cores and 4 threads. The AMD part has 50 percent more cores and three times the threads.

Clock speeds: the AMD part has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 0.10 GHz and a boost clock of 3.80 GHz. The AMD base clock is dramatically higher, while the boost clock advantage is 0.60 GHz.

Thermal design power: the AMD part is rated at 35 W, the Intel part at 6 W. This is a 29 W difference, the largest single gap in the specification comparison.

Socket and packaging: the AMD part uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel part uses Intel BGA 1264.

Process node and foundry: the AMD part uses 6 nm from TSMC, the Intel part uses 10 nm from Intel.

Cache: the AMD part has 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The Intel part has 96 KB L1 per core, 2 MB shared L2, and 6 MB shared L3. The L2 layout differs fundamentally: per-core on AMD, shared on Intel.

Memory: the AMD part supports DDR5 in dual-channel mode with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 in single-channel mode with 38.4 GB/s bandwidth.

PCIe: the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, the Intel part uses Gen 3 with 9 CPU lanes.

Integrated graphics: the AMD part has Radeon 660M, the Intel part has UHD Graphics 730.

Release dates: the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS was released on 2024-08-31, the Intel Processor N250 on 2025-01-06.

Part numbers: the AMD part is listed as 100-000001632(FP7) and 100-000001634(FP7r2), the Intel part as SRPNS.

Both processors lack ECC support, lack unlocked multipliers, and target the mobile segment. Neither has a recorded launch MSRP, so no pricing data is available for comparison.