AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Processor 300 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data shows a clear performance split between these two processors, though it is heavily one-sided. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS holds all recorded benchmark wins across every available test category. The Intel Processor 300 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, which leaves its competitive position entirely unquantified. What the data does establish is the Ryzen chip's dominance in both single-thread and multi-thread workloads.

Starting with multi-threaded performance, the Ryzen 5 7533HS delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12342, a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 5183, and a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1243. These figures reflect the advantage of its six cores and twelve threads. The PassMark multi-thread score of 14520 further confirms substantial parallel workload capability. The data also includes a PassMark physics score of 821, which typically correlates with simulation and physics-heavy tasks.

In single-thread performance, the Ryzen 5 7533HS records a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1742, a Cinebench R20 single-core score of 731, and a Cinebench R15 single-core score of 175. The PassMark single-thread score sits at 2740. These numbers show that despite being a mobile-oriented chip with a 35 W TDP, it maintains competitive single-core throughput.

Specialized workload results further illustrate where the Ryzen part wins. The PassMark data compression score of 168692, data encryption score of 10718, and extended instructions score of 11219 indicate strong performance in data-heavy tasks. Floating point math reaches 27800, integer math reaches 50800, and random string sorting hits 17669. The find prime numbers score of 48 is the only notably low result, suggesting a relative weakness in that particular integer-heavy operation.

Because the Intel Processor 300 has zero recorded benchmarks, the database cannot assign it any wins. Its percentile rank of 50 places it at the midpoint of all CPUs, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS sits at the 73rd percentile. The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, and the win count for each part is zero on both sides, meaning the only comparison available comes from the Ryzen chip's absolute scores and its percentile placement.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies and target different market segments. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the codename Rembrandt-R, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It is a mobile part designed for AMD Socket FP7. The Intel Processor 300 uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the codename Raptor Lake-S, built on a 10 nm process at Intel, and targets desktop systems on Intel Socket 1700.

Core counts differ substantially. The Ryzen chip provides six cores and twelve threads, while the Intel chip provides two cores and four threads. This three-to-one core ratio and thread advantage explain the Ryzen part's multi-threaded benchmark lead. The Ryzen processor has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The Intel processor has a higher base clock of 3.90 GHz but no recorded boost clock, which limits direct clock-speed comparison.

Cache hierarchies also differ. The Ryzen 5 7533HS uses 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Processor 300 uses 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. While the Intel part has more L1 and L2 per core, the Ryzen part has a much larger L3 pool. Die size favors Intel at 163 mm² versus 208 mm² for AMD, though the process node difference complicates any direct interpretation.

Memory support and PCIe generation also diverge. The Ryzen 5 7533HS supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel Processor 300 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, but the database records no memory bandwidth figure for it. PCIe connectivity favors Intel on generation with Gen 5 support across 16 CPU lanes, while AMD provides Gen 4 across 20 CPU lanes. The Ryzen part includes a Radeon 660M integrated GPU, while the Intel part includes UHD Graphics 710. Neither processor supports ECC memory, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The Ryzen chip's TDP is 35 W, while the Intel chip's TDP is 46 W. The Ryzen part was released later, with a release date in August 2024, while the Intel part appeared in January 2024.

The Verdict

The data points to a straightforward conclusion for workload selection. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is the processor to choose when multi-threaded performance matters. Its six cores and twelve threads, paired with a 73rd percentile ranking among all CPUs, give it a clear edge in rendering, compression, encryption, and math-heavy tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12342 and PassMark multi-thread score of 14520 demonstrate that it can handle parallel workloads without hesitation.

The Intel Processor 300, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark data. Its 50th percentile placement and two-core, four-thread configuration suggest it is a basic desktop part, but the database cannot verify any performance claims. For users who prioritize a desktop socket with DDR4 and DDR5 memory flexibility, Gen 5 PCIe lanes, or a lower die size, the Intel part offers those specifications. It also has a higher base clock of 3.90 GHz, which could matter for lightly threaded tasks, though no single-thread benchmark exists to confirm this.

The Ryzen 5 7533HS also carries the advantage of a lower 35 W TDP, which aligns with its mobile market segment. The Intel Processor 300 consumes more power at 46 W. Neither chip has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not a differentiator. The Ryzen part's integrated Radeon 660M is likely the more capable graphics solution, though the database records no graphics benchmarks for either part.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has six cores and twelve threads, while the Intel Processor 300 has two cores and four threads.

Q: What are the recorded Cinebench R23 scores for the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS?

A: The Ryzen 5 7533HS records a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12342 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1742.

Q: Does the Intel Processor 300 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Intel Processor 300 has an empty benchmark array, zero average benchmark score, and no nearest rivals recorded.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS supports DDR5 only. The Intel Processor 300 supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a TDP of 35 W, and the Intel Processor 300 has a TDP of 46 W.

Q: How do the two processors compare in PCIe support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS uses Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, while the Intel Processor 300 uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark table contains no entries, so the comparison relies on the Ryzen 5 7533HS's absolute scores. The largest multi-threaded wins come from the PassMark suite. The Ryzen part scores 168692 in data compression and 50800 in integer math, both figures that a two-core, four-thread desktop chip would struggle to approach. The floating point math score of 27800 and extended instructions score of 11219 reinforce the same pattern. Data encryption reaches 10718, and random string sorting reaches 17669.

In the Cinebench series, the Ryzen 5 7533HS shows consistent scaling. The R23 multi-core score of 12342 is roughly seven times its R23 single-core score of 1742, indicating strong multi-thread scaling across its twelve threads. The R20 results follow a similar ratio: 5183 multi-core versus 731 single-core. The R15 results show 1243 multi-core versus 175 single-core. These ratios are typical for a six-core, twelve-thread part.

The PassMark single-thread score of 2740 and the multithread score of 14520 provide another angle. The multi-thread score is roughly 5.3 times the single-thread score, which is consistent with a processor that has six physical cores and simultaneous multithreading. The physics score of 821 and find prime numbers score of 48 complete the picture, with the latter being the only weak spot in the recorded data.

The Intel Processor 300 cannot be placed into these comparisons because it has no scores. Its base clock of 3.90 GHz is higher than the Ryzen part's 3.30 GHz base, but without a boost clock or any benchmark result, the database cannot determine whether that translates into real performance. The percentile gap of 73 versus 50 is the only direct ranking available, and it favors the AMD part by a wide margin.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every recorded specification. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS belongs to the 7000 series and uses the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename. The Intel Processor 300 uses Raptor Lake with the Raptor Lake-S codename. Manufacturing differs: AMD uses a 6 nm process at TSMC, while Intel uses a 10 nm process at its own foundry. Die size measures 208 mm² for AMD and 163 mm² for Intel.

Core and thread counts differ at three to one: six cores and twelve threads versus two cores and four threads. Base clocks are 3.30 GHz for AMD and 3.90 GHz for Intel, with only AMD providing a boost clock at 4.40 GHz. The TDP figures are 35 W for AMD and 46 W for Intel. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part targets the mobile market, while the Intel part targets desktop.

Cache configurations differ in both per-core and shared allocations. The Ryzen 5 7533HS provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel Processor 300 provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3. Memory support shows DDR5 only for AMD versus DDR4 and DDR5 for Intel. The AMD part records a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Intel part has no recorded bandwidth. PCIe differs with Gen 4 and 20 lanes on AMD versus Gen 5 and 16 lanes on Intel. Integrated graphics are Radeon 660M on AMD and UHD Graphics 710 on Intel. Both lack ECC support and unlocked multipliers. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $82.