AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS and the Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, with zero wins recorded for either processor. This absence of comparative testing data means that any performance relationship between the two processors must be inferred from their individual recorded benchmark scores, architectural specifications, and the percentile rankings stored in the database.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a complete set of benchmark scores across multiple test suites. In Cinebench R23, it records a multi-core score of 12342 and a single-core score of 1742. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 5183 with a single-core score of 731. The older Cinebench R15 test shows a multi-core score of 1243 and a single-core score of 175. These Cinebench results indicate a processor with balanced scaling between single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads, though the single-core scores are relatively modest compared to modern high-end desktop parts.

PassMark results for the AMD processor show a multi-thread score of 14520 and a single-thread score of 2740. The integer math score is 50800, while floating point math records 27800. Data compression scores 168692, and data encryption records 10718. Extended instructions score 11219, and find prime numbers scores 48. Random string sorting scores 17669, and the physics test records 821. The average benchmark score for the AMD processor is 19364, placing it in the 73rd percentile among all CPUs in the database.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL has no benchmark scores recorded in the database. Its benchmark array is empty, its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its percentile ranking is 50. The lack of recorded test results means the database cannot currently present any measured performance comparison between these two processors. The Intel processor's percentile of 50 is not derived from actual test data but rather reflects the absence of recorded measurements.

Because no head-to-head results exist, the analysis must rely on the available data structure. The AMD processor's benchmark suite provides a basis for understanding its performance class, while the Intel processor's lack of data prevents any quantitative comparison. The database records the AMD processor's performance relative to its nearest rivals, which include the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V with an average score of 19368 and a delta of 0 percent, the Intel Core i5-1345U with an average score of 19411 and a delta of -0.2 percent, the Intel Core i7-8700K with an average score of 19238 and a delta of 0.7 percent, and the Intel Core i7-10700F with an average score of 19499 and a delta of -0.7 percent. These deltas show the AMD processor sits within a narrow performance band around these rivals, trailing the Core Ultra 5 226V by essentially nothing, trailing the Core i5-1345U by 0.2 percent, leading the Core i7-8700K by 0.7 percent, and trailing the Core i7-10700F by 0.7 percent.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL have any recorded benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The benchmark array for the Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL is empty, its average benchmark score is 0, and no percentile or rival data is recorded for it.

Q: What is the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS average benchmark score and percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has an average benchmark score of 19364 and ranks in the 73rd percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS compare to its nearest rivals in average score?

A: The AMD processor's nearest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V with an average score of 19368 and a delta of 0 percent. The Intel Core i5-1345U scores 19411 with a delta of -0.2 percent, the Intel Core i7-8700K scores 19238 with a delta of 0.7 percent, and the Intel Core i7-10700F scores 19499 with a delta of -0.7 percent.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL has 14 cores and 18 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz.

Q: What is the TDP for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a TDP of 35 watts. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL has a TDP of 45 watts.

The Verdict

The data does not support a performance verdict between these two processors because the Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL has no recorded benchmark scores. The database shows the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS with a complete benchmark profile and an average score of 19364, placing it in the 73rd percentile. The Intel processor has no measured results, an average score of 0, and a 50th percentile ranking that reflects missing data rather than tested performance.

For users who require tested performance data, the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is the only one of the two with recorded results. Its benchmark scores span Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, plus PassMark tests covering integer math, floating point math, data compression, data encryption, extended instructions, prime number finding, random string sorting, physics, multi-thread, and single-thread workloads. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL cannot be evaluated on measured performance from the database, so any selection between the two must account for the fact that the Intel processor's performance characteristics are unverified in the recorded data.

The AMD processor's nearest rival data shows it performs within a tight band around several Intel processors. It effectively matches the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V at a 0 percent delta, trails the Intel Core i5-1345U by 0.2 percent, leads the Intel Core i7-8700K by 0.7 percent, and trails the Intel Core i7-10700F by 0.7 percent. These comparisons provide context for the AMD processor's performance class, but they do not involve the Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every recorded specification field. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS belongs to the 7000 series from AMD, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL belongs to the Core Ultra Series 1 from Intel. The AMD processor has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel processor has 14 cores and 18 threads. The base clock for the AMD processor is 3.30 GHz, while the Intel processor has a base clock of 1.70 GHz. The boost clock for the AMD processor is 4.40 GHz, while the Intel processor boosts to 4.60 GHz.

The TDP differs significantly. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL has a TDP of 45 watts. The sockets are different as well. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1851.

The cache hierarchy shows substantial differences. The AMD processor has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor has 112 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache.

Memory bandwidth differs between the two. The AMD processor records a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Intel processor records 89.6 GB/s. Both support DDR5 memory and dual-channel memory buses, and neither supports ECC memory. The PCIe configuration differs. The AMD processor supports Gen 4 with 20 lanes on the CPU, while the Intel processor supports Gen 4 with 8 lanes on the CPU.

The integrated graphics differ. The AMD processor uses Radeon 660M graphics, while the Intel processor uses Arc Xe-LPG 128EU graphics. The market segment also differs. The AMD processor is listed as Mobile, while the Intel processor is listed as Desktop. The release dates differ as well. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a release date of August 31, 2024, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL has a release date of April 7, 2024. Neither processor has a recorded launch MSRP, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The architectural foundations of the two processors are entirely distinct. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS uses the Zen 3+ architecture with the codename Rembrandt-R, fabricated on a 6 nm process node at TSMC. The die size is 208 mm². The Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL uses the Meteor Lake architecture with the codename Meteor Lake-PS, fabricated on a 7 nm process node at Intel. No die size is recorded for the Intel processor.

The generation labels reflect the different design lineages. The AMD processor is listed as Ryzen 5 with the generation description "Zen 3+ (Rembrandt)". The Intel processor is listed as Ultra 5 with the generation description "Meteor Lake-PS". The foundry relationship also differs, with TSMC producing the AMD chip and Intel producing its own chip.

The core counts indicate a significant structural difference. The AMD processor has 6 cores and 12 threads, which implies simultaneous multithreading on a 6-core design. The Intel processor has 14 cores and 18 threads, which suggests a hybrid core arrangement typical of Meteor Lake designs, though the database does not specify the core type breakdown. The cache allocation per core differs notably. The Intel processor has 112 KB of L1 per core and 2 MB of L2 per core, while the AMD processor has 64 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core. The shared L3 cache is 16 MB for the AMD processor and 18 MB for the Intel processor.

The process node difference of 6 nm for AMD versus 7 nm for Intel indicates different manufacturing generations from different foundries. The memory bandwidth difference of 76.8 GB/s for AMD versus 89.6 GB/s for Intel reflects the different memory controllers and platform capabilities. The PCIe lane count also differs, with the AMD processor providing 20 Gen 4 lanes on the CPU versus 8 Gen 4 lanes on the CPU for the Intel processor.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is the only processor with measured performance, so it wins every category where benchmark data exists. Its complete Cinebench and PassMark suite provides verified results for single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads, data compression, data encryption, extended instruction sets, prime number finding, floating point math, integer math, random string sorting, and physics simulations. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL has no recorded wins because it has no recorded benchmark scores.

The AMD processor's specification profile suggests certain workload characteristics. Its higher base clock of 3.30 GHz versus 1.70 GHz for the Intel processor indicates the AMD chip sustains higher baseline frequency, which can benefit lightly threaded tasks that do not boost. The AMD processor's lower TDP of 35 watts versus 45 watts for the Intel processor positions it as a more power-efficient choice in the recorded specifications.

The Intel processor's specification profile shows advantages in raw resource counts. It has 14 cores versus 6 cores, 18 threads versus 12 threads, 18 MB of L3 cache versus 16 MB, a higher boost clock of 4.60 GHz versus 4.40 GHz, higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s, and a larger L2 cache allocation of 2 MB per core versus 512 KB per core. These specifications suggest the Intel processor could handle heavily threaded workloads with more parallel resources, but the database contains no measured scores to confirm this.

The market segment labels indicate different intended usage. The AMD processor is categorized as Mobile, while the Intel processor is categorized as Desktop. This difference matters for platform considerations, as the AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP7 and the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1851. The integrated graphics also differ, with the AMD processor using Radeon 660M and the Intel processor using Arc Xe-LPG 128EU, though no graphics benchmarks are recorded for either processor.

The database's nearest rival data for the AMD processor shows it competes closely with several Intel parts. It matches the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V at a 0 percent delta, trails the Intel Core i5-1345U by 0.2 percent, leads the Intel Core i7-8700K by 0.7 percent, and trails the Intel Core i7-10700F by 0.7 percent. This places the AMD processor in a specific performance band among tested CPUs, with its 73rd percentile ranking indicating it outperforms roughly three-quarters of the CPUs in the database.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL cannot be assigned any wins from the recorded data. Its percentile of 50 and average score of 0 reflect missing measurements, not tested performance. Until benchmark results are recorded for the Intel processor, the database supports only one conclusion: the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has verified performance data, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL does not.