AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Core i9-14900T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a decisive outcome: the Intel Core i9-14900T wins all 17 recorded head-to-head comparisons against the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS. There are no benchmark victories for the AMD processor in any of the measured tests. The largest margins appear in multi-threaded and math-heavy workloads, while the smallest gap is in single-thread performance.

In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel part scores 30803 against the AMD's 12342, a 59.9% deficit for the Ryzen. The single-core R23 result shows 4348 versus 1742, also a 59.9% gap. The pattern repeats across the older Cinebench versions: R20 multi-core gives 12937 versus 5183 (59.9% behind), and R15 multi-core gives 3104 versus 1243 (60% behind). Every Cinebench generation confirms the same approximate 60% advantage for Intel in both single and multi-threaded rendering workloads.

PassMark's integer math test shows the Intel CPU at 138149 versus 50800, a 63.2% lead. Floating point math is even more lopsided: 92699 against 27800, meaning the AMD chip trails by 70%. The find prime numbers test shows the widest relative gap at 70.7%, with scores of 164 versus 48. Data compression favors Intel by 61.3% (436066 versus 168692), while data encryption shows a 60.4% gap (27062 versus 10718).

The closest competition is in single-threaded PassMark tests. The Intel Core i9-14900T scores 4016 in both passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS scores 2740 in each, a 31.8% difference. This is the narrowest margin recorded, though still a clear Intel victory. Extended instructions show a 52.6% gap (23660 versus 11219), and random string sorting a 64.3% gap (49484 versus 17669). The multithread PassMark score of 36239 versus 14520 represents a 59.9% difference, and physics testing shows 2245 versus 821, a 63.4% gap.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS does not win any benchmark category recorded in the database. Every test, from Cinebench rendering to PassMark's encryption and compression suites, lists the Intel Core i9-14900T as the winner. The AMD processor's closest relative performance is in single-threaded tasks, where the 31.8% gap is smaller than the roughly 60% to 70% deficits seen elsewhere, but it still falls short on absolute scores.

The Intel Core i9-14900T dominates in all measured workload types. Rendering benchmarks (Cinebench R15, R20, R23) show consistent 59.9% to 60% advantages in both single and multi-core variants. PassMark's integer and floating point math tests reveal even larger leads of 63.2% and 70% respectively. The find prime numbers test, which stresses iterative computation, shows the biggest gap at 70.7%. Data compression and encryption workloads also favor Intel heavily, with 61.3% and 60.4% margins.

The use-case split is therefore straightforward: the Intel part wins every scenario represented in the data. The AMD chip's best case is single-threaded responsiveness, where the margin narrows to 31.8%, but it still loses. For multi-threaded productivity, rendering, or math-intensive simulation, the Intel processor's lead grows to roughly two-thirds or more. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS offers no benchmark category where it takes the lead, so any workload selection based on these numbers would favor Intel.

The Verdict

The recorded data indicates that the Intel Core i9-14900T is the superior processor across every benchmark in the comparison. It holds a 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS sits at the 73rd percentile. The Intel part's average benchmark score is 51015, compared to 19364 for the AMD chip, a difference of roughly 2.6 times. The nearest rivals for the Intel part include the Intel Core i7-13850HX at 50761 (0.5% behind), the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T at 51310 (0.6% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT at 50718 (0.6% behind), and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 at 50448 (1.1% behind). These figures place the Core i9-14900T in a tightly contested high-end cluster, whereas the Ryzen 5 7533HS sits alongside mid-range parts like the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (19368, 0% delta), Intel Core i5-1345U (19411, 0.2% ahead), Intel Core i7-8700K (19238, 0.7% behind), and Intel Core i7-10700F (19499, 0.7% ahead).

For multi-threaded workloads, the Intel part delivers Cinebench R23 multi-core scores that are 2.5 times higher. For single-threaded tasks, the advantage is roughly 2.5 times in Cinebench and 1.5 times in PassMark. The AMD processor's only comparative strength is its lower power envelope matching the Intel part at 35 watts TDP, but that does not translate into any benchmark win. The Intel Core i9-14900T also supports ECC memory, which the AMD part does not, and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, versus Gen 4 with 20 lanes on the AMD chip. The data indicates no scenario where the Ryzen 5 7533HS outperforms the Core i9-14900T, so the verdict from benchmark results is unambiguous.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher Cinebench R23 multi-core score?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900T scores 30803, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS scores 12342. The Intel part leads by 59.9%.

Q: What is the smallest performance gap between the two processors?

A: The smallest gap is in the PassMark single-thread tests, where the Intel Core i9-14900T scores 4016 and the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS scores 2740, a 31.8% difference.

Q: How do the two processors compare on memory support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS supports DDR5 only with dual-channel memory and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core i9-14900T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory, and the database does not list a bandwidth figure for it.

Q: Do both processors have the same TDP?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS and the Intel Core i9-14900T have a TDP of 35 watts.

Q: Which processor has ECC memory support?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900T supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS does not.

Q: What are the percentile rankings for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS ranks in the 73rd percentile among all CPUs, and the Intel Core i9-14900T ranks in the 90th percentile.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the codename Rembrandt-R, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a die size of 208 mm². The Intel Core i9-14900T uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-R, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. It has 24 cores and 32 threads, with a die size of 257 mm².

Cache hierarchies differ substantially. The AMD chip provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part's larger L3 cache more than doubles the AMD processor's total, which aligns with its higher core count and thread count.

The integrated graphics also differ. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS includes a Radeon 660M, while the Intel Core i9-14900T includes UHD Graphics 770. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. The market segments differ as well: the AMD chip is classified as Mobile, and the Intel chip is classified as Desktop, despite both having a 35 watt TDP.

The Intel Core i9-14900T has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz versus 4.40 GHz for the AMD part, and a base clock of 1.10 GHz versus 3.30 GHz. The Intel processor's release date is earlier, 2024-01-07, while the AMD part's release date is 2024-08-31. The Intel part supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD part uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in core and thread counts: the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core i9-14900T has 24 cores and 32 threads. Base clocks are 3.30 GHz for AMD and 1.10 GHz for Intel, while boost clocks are 4.40 GHz and 5.50 GHz respectively. The process nodes differ: 6 nm for AMD at TSMC, and 10 nm for Intel at its own foundry.

Cache configurations are distinct, with the AMD part using 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3, while the Intel part uses 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3. Memory support differs: AMD supports DDR5 only, Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD part lists a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Intel part does not have a bandwidth figure in the database. ECC memory is supported on Intel but not on AMD.

PCIe capabilities differ, with AMD offering Gen 4 and 20 lanes, and Intel offering Gen 5 and 16 lanes. The integrated graphics units are different, with the AMD Radeon 660M versus Intel UHD Graphics 770. The sockets are different: AMD Socket FP7 versus Intel Socket 1700. The die sizes are 208 mm² for AMD and 257 mm² for Intel. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $549, while the AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded. The market segment is Mobile for AMD and Desktop for Intel. The part numbers are 100-000001632(FP7)100-000001634(FP7r2) for AMD and SRN3U for Intel.