AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Core i9-14900F Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS and Intel Core i9-14900F occupy different platform classes. The AMD part is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor with a 35 TDP, Radeon 660M integrated graphics, and a boost clock of 4.40. The Intel part is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor with a 65 TDP, no integrated graphics, and a boost clock of 5.80. In the database's 17 recorded head-to-head comparisons, the Intel Core i9-14900F wins all 17, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS records 0 wins.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark split is one-sided. Intel wins every recorded comparison, so there is no workload category in the head-to-head set where the AMD part takes the lead. The closest result is PassMark single-thread, where AMD scores 2740 against Intel's 4506, a delta of -39.2%. Every other margin is larger, which means the Intel part leads by more than two-thirds in most tests.

The AMD part's average benchmark score is 19364, placing it in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals by average score include the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V at 19368, the Intel Core i5-1345U at 19411, the Intel Core i7-8700K at 19238, and the Intel Core i7-10700F at 19499. Relative to those, the AMD chip is effectively level with the Core Ultra 5 226V, 0.2% behind the Core i5-1345U, 0.7% ahead of the Core i7-8700K, and 0.7% behind the Core i7-10700F.

The Intel part's average benchmark score is 60008, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals by average score are the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX at 60099, the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX at 60104, the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D at 59641, and the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T at 60572. The Intel chip sits 0.2% behind the Ryzen 9 7945HX and Ryzen 7 8745HX, 0.6% ahead of the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, and 0.9% behind the Xeon Gold 6338T.

Because AMD has no benchmark wins, its use case is defined by platform attributes rather than measured performance. It is the mobile part with integrated graphics, a 35 TDP, and a lower boost clock. Intel is the desktop part with no integrated graphics and a higher TDP, and it wins every recorded benchmark by a wide margin.

Architecture Differences

The two processors use different process nodes, core configurations, and cache layouts. AMD uses a 6 nm TSMC process, while Intel uses a 10 nm process. AMD's die size is 208 mm², and Intel's die size is 257 mm².

The core counts differ substantially. AMD has 6 cores and 12 threads, while Intel has 24 cores and 32 threads. Base clocks also diverge: AMD runs at 3.30, while Intel runs at 2.00. Boost clocks reverse the order, with AMD at 4.40 and Intel at 5.80.

Cache organization is different at every level. AMD has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Intel has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

Memory support differs. AMD supports DDR5 only, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. AMD records a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while Intel's entry does not record a memory bandwidth figure. AMD has ECC memory set to false, while Intel has ECC memory set to true.

The platform interfaces also differ. AMD uses AMD Socket FP7 and PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. Intel uses Intel Socket 1700 and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. AMD includes Radeon 660M integrated graphics, while Intel lists integrated graphics as N/A. AMD is marked as a mobile part, while Intel is marked as a desktop part. The release dates differ as well: AMD is dated 2024-08-31, and Intel is dated 2024-01-07.

The Verdict

The recorded data points to a clear performance hierarchy. The Intel Core i9-14900F wins every one of the 17 head-to-head benchmarks, and its average benchmark score of 60008 is far above the AMD part's 19364. Its 92nd percentile ranking also sits well above the AMD part's 73rd percentile.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS does not win any measured benchmark in this comparison. Its case rests on platform features: it is the mobile processor, it includes Radeon 660M integrated graphics, and it runs at 35 TDP. The Intel part is the desktop processor, has no integrated graphics, and runs at 65 TDP.

The data directs desktop builds with no integrated graphics requirement to the Intel part; it wins every recorded test and offers DDR4 or DDR5 memory support plus ECC true. The data directs mobile builds that need integrated graphics to the AMD part, since it is the only one of the two with a mobile socket, Radeon 660M, and a 35 TDP.

FAQ

Q: Does the Ryzen 5 7533HS win any head-to-head benchmark against the Core i9-14900F?

A: No. The database records 0 wins for the AMD part and 17 wins for the Intel part.

Q: What is the closest head-to-head result?

A: PassMark single-thread is the closest, with AMD at 2740 and Intel at 4506, a delta of -39.2%. The duplicate PassMark singlethread entry shows the same result.

Q: What is the largest head-to-head margin?

A: PassMark find prime numbers has the largest margin: AMD scores 48, Intel scores 209, a delta of -77%.

Q: How do average benchmark scores and percentiles compare?

A: AMD has an average benchmark score of 19364 and sits in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs. Intel has an average benchmark score of 60008 and sits in the 92nd percentile.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900F records ECC memory true. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS records ECC memory false.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD part supports DDR5 only. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The table below lists all 17 recorded comparisons. Delta values are negative because the AMD score is lower than the Intel score in every test.

| Test | AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS | Intel Core i9-14900F | Delta |

|---|---:|---:|---:|

| Cinebench R15 multicore | 1243 | 3986 | -68.8% |

| Cinebench R15 singlecore | 175 | 562 | -68.9% |

| Cinebench R20 multicore | 5183 | 16611 | -68.8% |

| Cinebench R20 singlecore | 731 | 2344 | -68.8% |

| Cinebench R23 multicore | 12342 | 39551 | -68.8% |

| Cinebench R23 singlecore | 1742 | 5583 | -68.8% |

| PassMark data compression | 168692 | 564207 | -70.1% |

| PassMark data encryption | 10718 | 34644 | -69.1% |

| PassMark extended instructions | 11219 | 31084 | -63.9% |

| PassMark find prime numbers | 48 | 209 | -77% |

| PassMark floating point math | 27800 | 119550 | -76.7% |

| PassMark integer math | 50800 | 177066 | -71.3% |

| PassMark multithread | 14520 | 46532 | -68.8% |

| PassMark physics | 821 | 2899 | -71.7% |

| PassMark random string sorting | 17669 | 63728 | -72.3% |

| PassMark single-thread | 2740 | 4506 | -39.2% |

| PassMark singlethread | 2740 | 4506 | -39.2% |

The largest Intel win is PassMark find prime numbers at -77%, with AMD at 48 and Intel at 209. PassMark floating point math follows at -76.7%, with AMD at 27800 and Intel at 119550. Random string sorting is -72.3%, with AMD at 17669 and Intel at 63728. Physics is -71.7%, with AMD at 821 and Intel at 2899. Integer math is -71.3%, with AMD at 50800 and Intel at 177066.

The Cinebench tests cluster tightly. R15 multicore is -68.8%, R20 multicore is -68.8%, and R23 multicore is -68.8%, with scores of 1243 against 3986, 5183 against 16611, and 12342 against 39551. Single-core Cinebench results are similar: R15 singlecore is -68.9%, R20 singlecore is -68.8%, and R23 singlecore is -68.8%. The smallest margin is PassMark single-thread at -39.2%, but it still leaves Intel clearly ahead.

Specification Differences

Only the fields where the two processors differ are listed.

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS | Intel Core i9-14900F |

|---|---|---|

| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |

| Series | 7000 series | Core 14th Gen |

| Cores | 6 | 24 |

| Threads | 12 | 32 |

| Base clock | 3.30 | 2.00 |

| Boost clock | 4.40 | 5.80 |

| TDP | 35 | 65 |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen 5 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt)) | Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process node | 6 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | 208 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 36 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 660M | N/A |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release date | 2024-08-31 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | None recorded | $524 |

| Part number | 100-000001632(FP7)100-000001634(FP7r2) | SRN3W |