AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Core i7-14650HX Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor built on TSMC's 6 nm node, while the Intel Core i7-14650HX is a 16-core, 24-thread mobile part fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process. The benchmark data shows a decisive performance gap between the two, with the Intel chip winning all 17 head-to-head comparisons recorded in the database. The Ryzen 5 7533HS occupies the 73rd percentile of all CPUs, while the Core i7-14650HX sits at the 88th percentile, reflecting a clear stratification in their performance classes.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-14650HX has an average benchmark score of 41576, compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS at 19364.

Q: How large is the multi-thread performance gap in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i7-14650HX scores 20454 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is 39.7% higher than the Ryzen 5 7533HS at 12342.

Q: Which chip has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-14650HX boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS reaches 4.40 GHz.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core i7-14650HX has 16 cores and 24 threads.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i7-14650HX supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS does not.

Q: What is the difference in TDP between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Intel Core i7-14650HX has a TDP of 55 watts.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split between these two mobile processors is substantial. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS uses the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename, part of the Ryzen 5 generation on the 7000 series. It is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 208 mm². The Intel Core i7-14650HX employs the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-HX codename, part of the Core 14th Gen series. It uses a 10 nm process at Intel with a larger die size of 257 mm².

Cache configurations differ markedly. The AMD chip provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip offers 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger L3 allocation on Intel gives it a notable advantage in workloads that benefit from larger shared pools of fast memory.

Memory support also diverges. The Ryzen 5 7533HS supports DDR5 memory only, over a dual-channel bus with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Core i7-14650HX supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also over a dual-channel bus, though the database does not record a bandwidth figure for it. PCIe connectivity differs as well: AMD provides Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

The integrated graphics solutions are distinct. AMD pairs the processor with a Radeon 660M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 710. The AMD chip also carries a socket of AMD Socket FP7, while Intel uses Intel BGA 1964. The Intel part is multiplier unlocked, whereas the AMD chip is not.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a sweep: the Intel Core i7-14650HX wins all 17 head-to-head comparisons in the database. The margins vary significantly by workload, ranging from a modest 11.5% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core to a dominant 68.4% lead in PassMark find prime numbers.

In multi-core rendering, the Intel part is far ahead. Cinebench R15 multi-core shows Intel at 3470.5 against AMD at 1243, a 64.2% deficit for the Ryzen chip. Cinebench R20 multi-core shows a similar story: Intel scores 11946 versus 5183, a 56.6% gap. Cinebench R23 multi-core narrows the relative gap to 39.7%, with Intel at 20454 and AMD at 12342.

Single-core performance favors Intel, but by smaller margins. Cinebench R15 single-core has Intel at 285.5 versus AMD at 175, a 38.7% difference. Cinebench R20 single-core shows Intel at 1686 versus 731, a 56.6% gap. Cinebench R23 single-core is the closest contest in the entire dataset, with Intel at 1969 and AMD at 1742, an 11.5% advantage.

The PassMark suite reinforces the multi-thread dominance. PassMark multi-thread scores show Intel at 33495 versus AMD at 14520, a 56.7% gap. PassMark floating point math has Intel at 84999 versus 27800, a 67.3% difference. PassMark integer math shows Intel at 116661 versus 50800, a 56.5% gap. PassMark physics has Intel at 2202 versus 821, a 62.7% deficit for AMD.

Data-focused workloads show the widest margins. PassMark find prime numbers has Intel at 152 versus 48, a 68.4% gap. PassMark data compression shows Intel at 398418 versus 168692, a 57.7% difference. PassMark random string sorting has Intel at 43035 versus 17669, a 58.9% gap. PassMark data encryption shows Intel at 22917 versus 10718, a 53.2% difference. PassMark extended instructions has Intel at 24150 versus 11219, a 53.5% gap.

Single-thread PassMark results show Intel at 3841 versus 2740, a 28.7% advantage. This is the second-closest margin after Cinebench R23 single-core.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every recorded specification field. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core i7-14650HX has 16 cores and 24 threads. Base clocks are 3.30 GHz for AMD and 2.20 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks are 4.40 GHz for AMD and 5.20 GHz for Intel. TDP is 35 watts for AMD and 55 watts for Intel.

Process node and foundry differ: AMD uses 6 nm at TSMC, Intel uses 10 nm at Intel. Die size is 208 mm² for AMD and 257 mm² for Intel. Cache sizes differ at every level: L1 is 64 KB per core for AMD versus 80 KB per core for Intel, L2 is 512 KB per core for AMD versus 2 MB per core for Intel, and L3 is 16 MB shared for AMD versus 30 MB shared for Intel.

Memory support shows AMD limited to DDR5 while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is recorded at 76.8 GB/s for AMD, with no figure for Intel. ECC support is present on Intel but absent on AMD. PCIe generations differ: AMD provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes, Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics are Radeon 660M on AMD and UHD Graphics 710 on Intel.

Socket types differ: AMD Socket FP7 for AMD, Intel BGA 1964 for Intel. The Intel part has an unlocked multiplier, while the AMD part is locked. Release dates also differ, with Intel launching earlier in 2024 and AMD later in 2024.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14650HX wins every recorded benchmark, so the use-case split is defined by the degree of its advantage rather than by alternating victories. The largest gaps appear in computationally intensive, highly parallel workloads. PassMark find prime numbers shows a 68.4% lead, PassMark floating point math shows a 67.3% lead, and PassMark physics shows a 62.7% lead. These results indicate that the Intel chip is particularly strong for scientific computing, physics simulations, and other floating-point-heavy tasks.

Content creation and data processing workloads also favor Intel decisively. PassMark data compression shows a 57.7% lead, data encryption shows a 53.2% lead, and random string sorting shows a 58.9% lead. The 16-core, 24-thread configuration with 30 MB of shared L3 cache provides a substantial advantage in multi-threaded productivity tasks.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS, while losing every comparison, shows its most competitive results in single-threaded workloads. Cinebench R23 single-core has Intel ahead by only 11.5%, and PassMark single-thread shows a 28.7% gap. These are the smallest margins in the dataset, suggesting that the Zen 3+ architecture at 6 nm is relatively strong on a per-core basis. The 35-watt TDP also positions it for lower-power mobile designs, though the database does not record battery life or thermal measurements.

For users selecting between these two, the data points to a simple split. The Intel Core i7-14650HX is the superior choice for any workload that can use multiple cores, and it also leads in single-thread performance. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is the only option for systems requiring a 35-watt TDP and DDR5-only memory support, and its smaller die size at 208 mm² may appeal to compact laptop designs. The benchmark record, however, leaves no ambiguity about raw performance: Intel wins all 17 comparisons, with an average score more than double that of AMD.