AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Core i5-14600 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS and Intel Core i5-14600 occupy different corners of the processor market, one a low-power mobile part and the other a mainstream desktop chip. The benchmark data shows a decisive performance gap across every recorded test, with the Intel part winning all 17 head-to-head comparisons. The average benchmark score for the Ryzen 5 7533HS is 19364, placing it in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs, while the Core i5-14600 averages 44889, landing in the 89th percentile. This substantial difference in overall scoring sets the stage for a detailed breakdown of where each processor stands.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking pattern in the recorded data is the consistency of the Intel Core i5-14600’s victories. In Cinebench tests, the Intel part leads by a nearly uniform margin. For Cinebench R23 multicore, the Core i5-14600 scores 30464 against the Ryzen 5 7533HS’s 12342, a delta of -59.5% for the AMD chip. The single-core R23 result shows the same 59.5% deficit, with scores of 4300 and 1742 respectively. This consistency extends through Cinebench R15 and R20, where every single-core and multicore test shows the AMD processor trailing by either 59.5% or 59.6%.

PassMark results reinforce this trend, though the margins vary more widely by workload. The largest gap appears in the find prime numbers test, where the Intel part scores 155 against the AMD chip’s 48, a 69% deficit. Floating point math also shows a major separation, with Intel at 85759 and AMD at 27800, a 67.6% gap. Data compression favors Intel at 434620 versus 168692, a 61.2% difference, while data encryption shows a smaller but still significant 57.3% gap, with scores of 25082 and 10718.

The narrowest margin in the entire comparison appears in PassMark single-thread performance. Here, the Core i5-14600 scores 4167 and the Ryzen 5 7533HS scores 2740, a 34.2% deficit. This remains a clear Intel win, but it indicates that the AMD part’s single-thread efficiency is relatively closer to its rival than its multicore performance. Other PassMark tests fall in between: extended instructions show a 56.3% gap, integer math a 56.6% gap, multithread a 59.5% gap, random string sorting a 63.2% gap, and physics a 64.8% gap.

The data shows no recorded test where the Ryzen 5 7533HS takes a win, which gives the head-to-head comparison a one-sided character. The Intel part’s nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i9-12900KS with an average score of 45094 and a delta of -0.5%, plus the AMD EPYC 4344P at 45122, also -0.5%. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS, by contrast, sits near the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V at 19368, the Intel Core i5-1345U at 19411, and the Intel Core i7-8700K at 19238. These rival groupings show that the two processors operate in entirely different performance classes, with the Intel part aligning with high-end desktop chips and the AMD part aligning with mid-range mobile and older desktop parts.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 has an average benchmark score of 44889, compared to 19364 for the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS.

Q: How far apart are the two processors in Cinebench R23 multicore performance?

A: The Core i5-14600 scores 30464, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS scores 12342, a 59.5% deficit for the AMD chip.

Q: What is the smallest performance gap between the two CPUs?

A: The smallest gap is in PassMark single-thread performance, where the Core i5-14600 leads by 34.2%, scoring 4167 against 2740.

Q: Which processor supports DDR4 memory?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS supports only DDR5.

Q: Do both processors have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS includes Radeon 660M graphics, and the Intel Core i5-14600 includes UHD Graphics 770.

Q: Which processor has ECC memory support?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS does not.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14600 wins in every benchmark category recorded, which makes its strengths easy to enumerate. Multicore rendering workloads show the largest advantages, with Cinebench R20 multicore at 12794 versus 5183, and Cinebench R15 multicore at 3070 versus 1243. The Intel part also dominates compute-heavy PassMark tasks, including floating point math, integer math, and data compression, where its scores are roughly two to three times higher than the AMD chip’s results. The physics test in PassMark, which often reflects gaming or simulation workloads, shows Intel at 2330 against 821, a 64.8% gap.

For the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS, there are no recorded benchmark wins, but the data does reveal where the gap is least severe. Single-thread performance is the AMD part’s closest comparison, with a 34.2% deficit, meaning its per-core efficiency is relatively stronger than its multicore throughput. The PassMark single-thread score of 2740, while lower than Intel’s 4167, positions the chip closer to its rival than any other test in the set. This suggests that the Ryzen 5 7533HS’s architecture handles lightly threaded tasks with proportionally more success than heavily threaded ones.

The AMD chip also has advantages outside raw performance scores. Its 35 W TDP is substantially lower than the Intel part’s 65 W TDP, and its mobile market segment indicates it is designed for systems where power draw and thermal output are primary constraints. The integrated Radeon 660M graphics provide a visual output solution, as does the Intel UHD Graphics 770, but the AMD part’s lower power envelope gives it a positioning advantage for portable systems.

Specification Differences

The core configuration separates the two processors clearly. The Intel Core i5-14600 uses 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS uses 6 cores and 12 threads. Clock speeds also differ: the Intel part has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, whereas the AMD part has a base of 3.30 GHz and a boost of 4.40 GHz. The AMD chip starts at a higher base frequency, but the Intel chip reaches a higher boost frequency.

Cache hierarchies show notable differences. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. Process node and die size also differ, with the AMD chip built on a 6 nm TSMC process with a 208 mm² die, while the Intel chip uses a 10 nm Intel process with a 257 mm² die.

Memory support varies significantly. The Intel Core i5-14600 supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS supports only DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses, but the AMD part lists a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Intel part has no recorded bandwidth figure. ECC memory is supported on the Intel chip but not on the AMD chip. PCIe connectivity also differs: the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, and the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes.

The sockets are incompatible, with the AMD chip using AMD Socket FP7 and the Intel chip using Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part is a mobile processor, while the Intel part is a desktop processor. The Intel Core i5-14600 has a launch MSRP of $255. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has no recorded launch MSRP. The Intel chip’s part number is SRN44, and the AMD chip lists two part numbers, 100-000001632(FP7) and 100-000001634(FP7r2).

The Verdict

The data points to a clear performance hierarchy. The Intel Core i5-14600 is the stronger processor in every measured benchmark, with an average score more than double that of the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS. Its 89th percentile ranking versus the AMD chip’s 73rd percentile confirms that the Intel part belongs to a higher performance tier. Buyers focused on multicore workloads, content creation, or compute-heavy applications should favor the Intel part based on the recorded results alone.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS serves a different role. Its 35 W TDP and mobile socket make it suitable for laptops and compact systems where the Intel part’s 65 W desktop design would not fit. The AMD chip’s closest rival in the database is the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V with an average score of 19368, a negligible 0% delta, which places it in a competitive class of mobile processors. For users who prioritize portability and power efficiency over raw throughput, the Ryzen 5 7533HS remains a viable option, but it does not compete with the Core i5-14600 on performance grounds.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the codename Rembrandt-R, part of the 7000 series and the Ryzen 5 generation. It is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC with a 208 mm² die. The Intel Core i5-14600 uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the codename Raptor Lake-R, part of the Core 14th Gen and the Core i5 generation. It is built on a 10 nm process at Intel with a 257 mm² die.

Core counts reflect the architectural split. The AMD chip provides 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel chip provides 14 cores and 20 threads. This difference explains much of the multicore performance gap, as the Intel part has more than twice the core count. Cache configurations also differ by design, with the Intel part offering more L1, L2, and L3 cache per core and in total.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS includes Radeon 660M graphics, while the Intel Core i5-14600 includes UHD Graphics 770. Memory support diverges, with the AMD chip limited to DDR5 and the Intel chip supporting both DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD chip’s PCIe implementation uses Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, while the Intel chip uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and both are listed as Active in production status. The AMD chip released on 2024-08-31, and the Intel chip released on 2024-01-07.