AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Core i5-14500HX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data delivers a decisive verdict: the Intel Core i5-14500HX wins all 17 head-to-head benchmarks against the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS. There is no single test where the AMD part takes the lead. The margins are consistently large, ranging from a 24.5% gap in single-threaded workloads to a 63.1% gap in prime number finding.

Starting with single-core performance, the Intel part posts a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3421 against the AMD's 1742, a 49.1% deficit for the Ryzen. The same delta appears across the older Cinebench versions: R20 single-core shows 1436 versus 731, and R15 single-core shows 344 versus 175, both at the same 49.1% disadvantage. PassMark single-thread results narrow the gap but still favor Intel: 3629 versus 2740, a 24.5% difference. This indicates the Intel architecture delivers a substantial per-thread advantage that persists across different benchmark generations.

Multi-core results amplify the lead. Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 24234 for the Intel chip versus 12342 for the AMD chip, again a 49.1% delta. The R20 multi-core test shows 10178 against 5183, and R15 multi-core shows 2442 against 1243. PassMark multithread follows the pattern: 28508 versus 14520, a 49.1% gap. The consistency of this exact percentage across multiple Cinebench versions suggests a fixed performance scaling relationship between the two processors in heavily threaded workloads.

Specialized workloads show even wider separations. PassMark find prime numbers gives Intel a 130 versus 48 score, a 63.1% lead. Floating point math shows 69442 against 27800, a 60% gap. Physics simulation scores 1911 versus 821, a 57% difference. Data compression delivers 333851 versus 168692, a 49.5% lead. Random string sorting sits at 36219 versus 17669, a 51.2% gap. Data encryption results in 19502 versus 10718, a 45% difference. Extended instructions score 20019 versus 11219, a 44% gap. Integer math rounds out the list at 95584 versus 50800, a 46.9% lead.

The overall average benchmark score tells the same story: the Intel processor averages 35094 across all recorded tests, while the AMD processor averages 19364. The Intel part sits in the 84th percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the AMD part sits in the 73rd percentile. The nearest rivals for the Intel chip include the Core i9-12900HX with an average score of 35003 (0.3% delta), the Core i7-13800H at 34988 (0.3% delta), and the Core 7 253PTE at 34962 (0.4% delta). The AMD chip's nearest rivals include the Core Ultra 5 226V at 19368 (0% delta), the Core i5-1345U at 19411 (-0.2% delta), and the Core i7-8700K at 19238 (0.7% delta). This placement confirms the Intel chip competes with far higher-tier hardware, while the AMD chip aligns with mid-range desktop and mobile parts.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge fundamentally in design. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS uses 6 cores and 12 threads, built on the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename, part of the 7000 series. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 208 mm². The Intel Core i5-14500HX uses 14 cores and 20 threads, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-HX codename, part of the Core 14th Gen. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel with a die size of 257 mm². The Intel chip has more than double the core count and nearly double the thread count, which directly explains its multi-threaded dominance.

Cache configurations differ significantly. The AMD processor provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger per-core L2 and the larger shared L3 give Intel an advantage in workloads that repeatedly access working sets. The L3 capacity difference alone is 8 MB, which can matter in data-heavy applications.

Clock speeds show a trade-off. The AMD chip has a higher base clock at 3.30 GHz versus 2.60 GHz for Intel. The Intel chip has a higher boost clock at 4.90 GHz versus 4.40 GHz for AMD. This explains why the Intel chip leads in single-thread tests despite a lower base frequency: its boost ceiling is 0.50 GHz higher, and its architecture extracts more instructions per cycle. The AMD chip's higher base clock helps sustained low-intensity workloads but does not compensate in peak performance tests.

Power and platform specifications also differ. The AMD processor has a 35 W TDP and uses AMD Socket FP7. The Intel processor has a 55 W TDP and uses Intel BGA 1964. The higher power envelope for Intel supports its additional cores and higher boost frequency. Memory support: AMD supports DDR5 only with dual-channel bus and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel bus, though no bandwidth figure is recorded. The Intel chip supports ECC memory, while the AMD chip does not. PCIe capabilities differ: AMD provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics differ as well: AMD uses Radeon 660M, Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. The Intel chip has an unlocked multiplier, while the AMD chip does not. Release dates differ by about eight months: AMD launched on 2024-08-31, Intel on 2024-01-07.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data shows no wins for the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS in any recorded test. The Intel Core i5-14500HX wins every category, but the magnitude of the win varies by workload type, which informs usage scenarios.

For single-threaded responsiveness, the Intel chip leads by 24.5% in PassMark single-thread, which is the narrowest margin in the entire dataset. This suggests that for lightly threaded tasks such as basic office work, web browsing, or legacy application use, the Intel advantage is real but less overwhelming. The AMD chip's higher base clock of 3.30 GHz helps it stay competitive in such scenarios, though the Intel boost clock of 4.90 GHz ultimately wins.

For multi-threaded productivity, the Intel chip leads by about 49% across Cinebench R23, R20, and R15 multi-core tests. This makes Intel the clear choice for video rendering, 3D modeling, and software compilation that scales across cores. The 14-core, 20-thread configuration delivers roughly double the throughput of the 6-core, 12-thread AMD design.

For mathematical and scientific workloads, the Intel lead widens further. Prime number finding shows a 63.1% gap, floating point math shows 60%, and physics simulation shows 57%. These workloads benefit heavily from the Intel architecture's wider execution resources and higher boost clocks. The AMD chip falls behind by larger margins here than in general multi-core tests.

For data processing tasks, the Intel lead ranges from 44% to 51.2%. Extended instructions score 44% higher, data compression 49.5% higher, random string sorting 51.2% higher, and integer math 46.9% higher. The Intel chip's larger L3 cache and higher per-core L2 cache likely contribute to these results. Encryption shows a 45% lead, which aligns with the general multi-core pattern.

The AMD chip's only relative strengths come from its lower TDP of 35 W versus 55 W and its smaller die size of 208 mm² versus 257 mm². These factors are not reflected in the benchmark scores but indicate the AMD part fits in lower-power chassis designs. The recorded data provides no performance scenario where the AMD chip wins.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-core benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500HX leads in every single-core test. Cinebench R23 single-core scores 3421 versus 1742, and PassMark single-thread scores 3629 versus 2740.

Q: How large is the multi-core performance gap?

A: The Intel chip leads by 49.1% in Cinebench R23 multi-core (24234 versus 12342) and by the same percentage in R20 and R15 multi-core tests. PassMark multithread also shows a 49.1% gap.

Q: What is the difference in core and thread counts?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core i5-14500HX has 14 cores and 20 threads.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500HX supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS does not support ECC memory.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a TDP of 35 W. The Intel Core i5-14500HX has a TDP of 55 W.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500HX has a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a boost clock of 4.40 GHz.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS | Intel Core i5-14500HX |

|-------|---------------------|------------------------|

| Cores | 6 | 14 |

| Threads | 12 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 3.30 GHz | 2.60 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.40 GHz | 4.90 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 55 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel BGA 1964 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Raptor Lake-HX |

| Process Node | 6 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| Die Size | 208 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB per core | 2 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB shared | 24 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5 only | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 660M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |

| Release Date | 2024-08-31 | 2024-01-07 |

The Verdict

The benchmark database shows a clear hierarchy: the Intel Core i5-14500HX outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS in every recorded measurement. The Intel chip's average benchmark score of 35094 places it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD chip's average of 19364 places it in the 73rd percentile. The Intel processor aligns with rivals like the Core i9-12900HX and Core i7-13800H, while the AMD processor aligns with parts like the Core Ultra 5 226V and Core i7-8700K.

For users who prioritize raw performance, the data points exclusively to the Intel chip. Its 14 cores and 20 threads deliver roughly double the multi-threaded throughput, and its higher boost clock of 4.90 GHz delivers superior single-thread results. The 24 MB L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache support data-intensive workloads. The unlocked multiplier offers additional headroom for overclocking, and ECC memory support matters for systems requiring error correction.

The AMD chip's case rests on efficiency rather than performance. Its 35 W TDP is substantially lower than Intel's 55 W, and its 6 nm process node at TSMC is smaller than Intel's 10 nm node. The die size of 208 mm² is smaller than Intel's 257 mm². For thin-and-light mobile designs where battery life and thermal limits dominate, the AMD part presents a lower-power option. Its higher base clock of 3.30 GHz helps maintain responsiveness in light workloads.

The recorded data provides no benchmark-based reason to select the AMD processor for performance-driven tasks. The Intel chip wins all 17 head-to-head tests, with margins ranging from 24.5% to 63.1%. The only considerations in favor of AMD are power consumption and platform integration, which are not captured in the benchmark scores. The verdict from the database is unambiguous: the Intel Core i5-14500HX is the faster processor in every measurable workload.