AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS vs Intel Core i5-14401TE Comparison

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS compare to the Intel Core i5-14401TE in core and thread counts?

A: Both processors feature 6 cores and 12 threads, so they are identical in this specification. The difference lies in their architecture and clock speeds.

Q: What are the base and boost clock differences between the two CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS has a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The AMD part is significantly higher in both metrics.

Q: Which processor has a smaller manufacturing process node?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE uses a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD node is more advanced.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS and the Intel Core i5-14401TE support ECC memory.

Q: What is the market segment for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS is classified as a Mobile processor, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE is classified as a Desktop processor.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS has an average benchmark score of 30879 and sits in the 82nd percentile versus all CPUs. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits in the 50th percentile, meaning the database has no recorded benchmark scores for it.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS is based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Hawk Point, representing the 8000 series. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The Intel Core i5-14401TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake Refresh, part of the Core 14th Gen series. It is built on a 10 nm process at Intel, with a larger die size of 215 mm². The transistor count for the Intel part is not recorded.

Cache layouts differ notably. The AMD processor provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor offers 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip has larger cache allocations at every level.

Memory support also separates the two. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS supports DDR5 memory only, with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core i5-14401TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, though its memory bandwidth figure is not recorded.

PCI Express capabilities differ as well. The AMD processor uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics are present on both: the AMD part uses the Radeon 760M, and the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 730.

The socket and physical platform differ. AMD uses AMD Socket FP7, while Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part is a mobile component with part numbers 100-000001315 (FP7r2) and 100-000001388 (FP7). The Intel part is a desktop component with part number Q4T4SRNJP. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS and the Intel Core i5-14401TE. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has no recorded benchmark scores at all, with an average benchmark score of 0. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS, by contrast, has a full suite of recorded results.

Looking at the AMD processor's recorded scores, the Cinebench R23 multi-core result is 19742, and the single-core result is 2787. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 8291, with a single-core score of 1170. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 1989, and the single-core score is 280.

PassMark results for the AMD part show a multithread score of 23569 and a single-thread score of 3858. Additional PassMark metrics include 72740 in integer math, 45481 in floating point math, 21212 in extended instructions, 265826 in data compression, 17387 in data encryption, 35472 in random string sorting, 1208 in physics, and 73 in finding prime numbers.

Because the Intel Core i5-14401TE has no benchmark entries, relative performance cannot be quantified from direct measurements. The database does, however, place the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS in the 82nd percentile versus all CPUs, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE sits in the 50th percentile with no scores contributing to that ranking.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several recorded specification fields.

Clock speeds: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS runs at 4.30 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost. Intel Core i5-14401TE runs at 2.00 GHz base and 4.50 GHz boost.

Process node: AMD uses 4 nm at TSMC. Intel uses 10 nm.

Foundry: AMD uses TSMC. Intel uses Intel.

Die size: AMD measures 178 mm². Intel measures 215 mm².

Transistors: AMD records 25,000 million. Intel has no recorded transistor count.

Cache: AMD has 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB L3 shared. Intel has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 20 MB L3 shared.

Memory support: AMD supports DDR5 only. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Memory bandwidth: AMD records 89.6 GB/s. Intel has no recorded bandwidth figure.

PCIe: AMD uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics: AMD uses Radeon 760M. Intel uses UHD Graphics 730.

Socket: AMD uses AMD Socket FP7. Intel uses Intel Socket 1700.

Market segment: AMD is Mobile. Intel is Desktop.

Release date: AMD was released on 2024-04-15. Intel was released on 2024-06-30.

Series and architecture: AMD is from the 8000 series, Zen 4 (Hawk Point). Intel is from Core 14th Gen, Raptor Lake (Raptor Lake Refresh).

Part numbers: AMD lists 100-000001315 (FP7r2) and 100-000001388 (FP7). Intel lists Q4T4SRNJP.

Both processors share identical core counts (6), thread counts (12), TDP (45), dual-channel memory bus support, ECC memory support, and a locked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS wins on every measured benchmark category in the database, solely because it has recorded scores and the Intel Core i5-14401TE has none. The AMD part delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19742 and a single-core score of 2787. Its PassMark multithread score of 23569 and single-thread score of 3858 provide a baseline for multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads.

Clock speed favors AMD decisively. The 5.00 GHz boost clock against Intel's 4.50 GHz boost clock, and the 4.30 GHz base clock against Intel's 2.00 GHz base clock, suggest an advantage in latency-sensitive tasks and lightly threaded applications. The 4 nm process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die indicates a denser, more modern manufacturing approach than Intel's 10 nm process on a 215 mm² die.

Intel's advantages are structural rather than performance-derived. The Core i5-14401TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, which gives platform flexibility for desktop builders. Its PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes (CPU only) offers a newer interconnect standard than AMD's PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. Larger cache allocations, specifically 80 KB L1, 1.25 MB L2, and 20 MB L3 per core, may benefit workloads with high cache reuse. The desktop form factor and Intel Socket 1700 platform provide a different integration path than AMD's mobile FP7 socket.

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS sits in the 82nd percentile versus all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 30879. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F at 30746 (0.4% lower), the Intel Core i7-13700TE at 31028 (0.5% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS at 31074 (0.6% higher), and the Intel Core i7-12700F at 31081 (0.6% higher). This places the AMD part in a tight cluster near the 31000 average score mark, within 1% of all four listed rivals.

The Intel Core i5-14401TE has no nearest rivals listed and no average benchmark score. Its 50th percentile ranking reflects an absence of recorded measurements rather than a competitive position. For any workload where the database has data, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS is the only processor with measurable results. The Intel part's recorded strengths remain confined to platform features, memory compatibility, and cache size, none of which have corresponding benchmark scores in the database to confirm real-world impact.