AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Core i5-14400 Comparison

The database comparison between the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS and the Intel Core i5-14400 is one-sided in benchmark terms. The Intel part wins all 17 recorded head-to-head tests, while the AMD part records 0 wins. The Intel Core i5-14400 has an average benchmark score of 32115 and sits at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has an average benchmark score of 19364 and sits at the 73rd percentile. The two CPUs also target different platforms: AMD is a 35W mobile part on Socket FP7, while Intel is a 65W desktop part on Socket 1700.

The Verdict

Benchmark results indicate a clear performance hierarchy. The Intel Core i5-14400 wins every head-to-head test in the database, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has no recorded benchmark wins. The average scores reinforce that: 32115 for Intel versus 19364 for AMD. The Intel part’s nearest comparable entries include the Intel Core i7-12800H at 32121 with a delta of 0, the Intel Core i7-13705H at 32076 with a delta of 0.1, and the Intel Core i5-14450HX at 32040 with a delta of 0.2. The AMD part’s nearest comparable entries include the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V at 19368 with a delta of 0, the Intel Core i5-1345U at 19411 with a delta of -0.2, the Intel Core i7-8700K at 19238 with a delta of 0.7, and the Intel Core i7-10700F at 19499 with a delta of -0.7.

For a desktop Socket 1700 system, the data points to the Intel Core i5-14400 as the faster processor in every recorded benchmark. For a mobile FP7 system, the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is the only one of the two that fits that platform. The verdict is therefore split by platform: Intel for desktop compute, AMD for low-power mobile.

Where Each One Wins

The head-to-head benchmark set gives Intel 17 wins and AMD 0 wins. Intel wins all Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multi-core and single-core tests, plus every Passmark test in the set. The AMD part does not win any performance test in the comparison.

The AMD part’s distinguishing territory is platform-level. It is the only one of the two with a 35W TDP, a mobile market segment, an AMD Socket FP7, and a Radeon 660M integrated GPU. The Intel part is the only one with a 65W TDP, a desktop market segment, an Intel Socket 1700, and a UHD Graphics 730. The use-case split follows platform more than benchmark results: AMD for mobile systems, Intel for desktop systems.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 has an average benchmark score of 32115, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 19364. The Intel part also sits at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, compared with the 73rd percentile for AMD.

Q: Does the AMD part win any individual benchmark in the comparison?

A: No. The recorded comparison includes 17 tests, and the Intel Core i5-14400 wins all 17. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 0 wins.

Q: What is the largest performance gap in the head-to-head data?

A: The largest gap is Passmark floating-point math, where Intel scores 61549 and AMD scores 27800, a delta of -54.8%. The next largest gaps are data compression at -46.4%, random string sorting at -45.4%, and extended instructions at -43.4%.

Q: What is the smallest performance gap?

A: The smallest gap is Passmark single-thread, where Intel scores 3741 and AMD scores 2740, a delta of -26.8%. The database also includes a duplicate Passmark single-thread entry with the same scores.

Q: Which processor supports more memory types?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS supports DDR5 only. Intel also records ECC memory support, while AMD does not.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 has a boost clock of 4.70, above the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS’s 4.40. The AMD part has a higher base clock of 3.30 versus the Intel part’s 2.50.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS | Intel Core i5-14400 |

|---|---|---|

| Series | 7000 series | Core 14th Gen |

| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |

| Cores | 6 | 10 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base clock | 3.30 | 2.50 |

| Boost clock | 4.40 | 4.70 |

| TDP | 35 | 65 |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen 5 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt)) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process node | 6 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | 208 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC memory | false | true |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 660M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release date | 2024-08-31 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $221 |

| Part number | 100-000001632(FP7)100-000001634(FP7r2) | SRN3QSRN46 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i5-14400 wins every head-to-head benchmark. The largest margin is in Passmark floating-point math: Intel 61549, AMD 27800, delta -54.8%. Data compression shows Intel 314995, AMD 168692, delta -46.4%. Random string sorting shows Intel 32346, AMD 17669, delta -45.4%. Extended instructions shows Intel 19816, AMD 11219, delta -43.4%.

The Cinebench results are clustered. Cinebench R23 multi-core is 21315 versus 12342, delta -42.1%. Cinebench R20 multi-core is 8952 versus 5183, delta -42.1%. Cinebench R15 multi-core is 2148 versus 1243, delta -42.1%. Cinebench R23 single-core is 3009 versus 1742, delta -42.1%. Cinebench R20 single-core is 1263 versus 731, delta -42.1%. Cinebench R15 single-core is 303 versus 175, delta -42.2%.

Passmark multithread is 25080 versus 14520, delta -42.1%. Integer math is 82017 versus 50800, delta -38.1%. Data encryption is 16731 versus 10718, delta -35.9%. Physics is 1396 versus 821, delta -41.2%. Find prime numbers is 80 versus 48, delta -40%. The smallest margin is Passmark single-thread: Intel 3741, AMD 2740, delta -26.8%.

Architecture Differences

AMD uses Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename, built by TSMC on a 6 nm process with a 208 mm² die. Intel uses Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename, built by Intel on a 10 nm process with a 215 mm² die. The core counts differ: AMD has 6 cores and 12 threads, Intel has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Cache sizes differ at every level. AMD has 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. Intel has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 20 MB shared L3. Memory features differ: AMD supports DDR5 only with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5 and enables ECC memory. PCIe also differs: AMD provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics differ as well: AMD uses Radeon 660M, Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. The platform positioning is different: AMD uses Socket FP7 and targets mobile, Intel uses Socket 1700 and targets desktop, with TDPs of 35 and 65 respectively.