AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Core i5-1345U Comparison

The Intel Core i5-1345U and AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS are remarkably close competitors in the aggregate, with the Intel part holding a razor-thin 0.2% edge in average benchmark score (19411 vs 19364). Both sit at the 73rd percentile of all CPUs, placing them in the same performance tier. However, the head-to-head data reveals that this parity is an illusion of averaging; these processors win in almost entirely different workloads. The Intel chip dominates single-threaded and floating-point tasks, while the AMD chip takes the crown in sustained multi-threaded and integer-heavy scenarios. The result is a split decision where the right choice depends entirely on the intended software environment.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most dramatic separation comes in single-thread performance, where the Intel Core i5-1345U posts a commanding 37.1% lead over the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS in Cinebench R15 single-core (240 vs 175). This advantage narrows considerably in newer Cinebench versions, but Intel still holds a 24.6% lead in PassMark single-thread (3415 vs 2740). The story reverses in multi-threaded rendering, where the AMD chip’s higher sustained power envelope delivers a massive 37.4% victory in Cinebench R23 multi-core (12342 vs 7724). This is the single largest delta in the entire comparison, and it flips the script entirely.

The floating-point math tests offer another decisive Intel win, with the i5-1345U scoring 29.3% higher in PassMark floating-point math (35939 vs 27800). This suggests a significant advantage in scientific and engineering workloads that rely heavily on FPU throughput. Conversely, AMD strikes back in extended instruction sets, where the Ryzen 5 7533HS leads by 18.2% (11219 vs 9178), indicating better optimization for modern SIMD and cryptographic instruction paths.

The Cinebench R20 results show a closer contest, with AMD edging ahead by 4.6% in multi-core (5183 vs 4942) and 4.7% in single-core (731 vs 697). This is particularly interesting because it shows the AMD chip taking a single-thread lead in one generation of Cinebench, only to lose it in both R15 and R23. The PassMark multithread test is nearly dead even, with AMD winning by just 0.1% (14520 vs 14511), while PassMark physics is similarly tight at 0.4% in AMD’s favor (821 vs 818).

Data compression and encryption are narrow AMD wins, with margins of 2.8% (168692 vs 164005) and 4% (10718 vs 10288) respectively. Integer math goes to Intel by 4% (52847 vs 50800), and random string sorting sees Intel ahead by 6.9% (18888 vs 17669). Prime number finding is a virtual tie, with AMD winning by 2.1% (48 vs 47). Overall, the AMD processor wins 10 of the 17 head-to-head benchmarks, but the Intel chip’s wins tend to be larger in magnitude, particularly in the single-thread and floating-point categories.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-1345U is the clear choice for latency-sensitive, lightly threaded applications. Its 37.1% lead in Cinebench R15 single-core and 24.6% lead in PassMark single-thread indicate superior responsiveness in everyday desktop tasks, legacy software, and applications that scale poorly across cores. The 29.3% advantage in floating-point math makes it the better fit for audio processing, 3D modeling previews, and any workload that churns through large matrices or physics calculations. The 6.9% win in random string sorting also points to advantages in database indexing and text-processing tasks where memory access patterns are less predictable.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is the multi-threaded workhorse. The 37.4% margin in Cinebench R23 multi-core is the headline number, representing a massive advantage in video rendering, 3D animation, and batch photo processing. The 18.2% lead in extended instructions suggests better performance in encryption, compression, and specialized computational libraries that use AVX-512 or similar instruction sets. The wins in data compression (2.8%) and encryption (4%) reinforce this, positioning the AMD chip as the better choice for file archiving, virtual private network throughput, and secure data handling.

The near-ties in PassMark multithread (0.1% delta) and physics (0.4% delta) mean that neither chip holds a meaningful advantage in general productivity multitasking or gaming physics simulations. The AMD chip’s 4.6% lead in Cinebench R20 multi-core, while smaller than its R23 victory, still indicates that its performance advantage scales with workload duration and intensity. The Intel chip’s 4% lead in integer math suggests it retains an edge in older enterprise applications and certain database workloads that are heavily integer-bound.

The Verdict

For users prioritizing snappy single-thread responsiveness, legacy software compatibility, or floating-point-heavy scientific computing, the Intel Core i5-1345U is the data-backed choice. Its 24.6% single-thread advantage and 29.3% floating-point lead are decisive, and its 5.5% win in Cinebench R15 multi-core shows it can still handle modest multi-threaded loads without embarrassment. The Intel chip also wins on platform flexibility, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, which could matter for system integration choices.

For content creators, data analysts, and anyone running sustained multi-threaded workloads, the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is the clear winner. The 37.4% margin in Cinebench R23 multi-core is not a minor edge; it is a category-defining difference that will translate into meaningfully faster render times and compilation speeds. The AMD chip’s wins in extended instructions, data compression, and encryption round out a profile that excels at batch processing and security-related tasks. Its 6 nm TSMC process node also suggests better power efficiency per clock, though the higher 35W TDP must be considered for thermal design.

The aggregate scores are so close that users who do a mix of both workload types will find the choice inconsequential. However, the data is unambiguous: pick Intel for single-thread and floating-point, pick AMD for multi-thread and extended instruction sets. The Intel chip’s 7 benchmark wins versus AMD’s 10 are mitigated by the fact that Intel’s wins are often twice as large in percentage terms. The AMD chip’s wins are more numerous but frequently narrow, with five of its ten wins coming in at under 5% margins.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-thread score in current benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core i5-1345U leads in PassMark single-thread with a score of 3415 versus 2740 for the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS, a 24.6% advantage.

Q: How large is the multi-core performance gap in Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS scores 12342 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, while the Intel Core i5-1345U scores 7724, giving AMD a 37.4% lead.

Q: Which chip is better for floating-point calculations?

A: The Intel Core i5-1345U is significantly better, scoring 35939 in PassMark floating-point math versus 27800 for the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS, a 29.3% difference.

Q: Do both processors have the same number of threads?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core i5-1345U (10 cores) and AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS (6 cores) have 12 threads, though their core counts and physical designs differ.

Q: What is the difference in memory support between the two?

A: The Intel Core i5-1345U supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS supports only DDR5 in dual-channel mode.

Q: Which processor has a higher benchmark percentile?

A: Both are tied at the 73rd percentile of all CPUs, and their average benchmark scores differ by less than 0.5% (19411 vs 19364).

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Core i5-1345U is built on a 10 nm process at Intel’s own foundry, using the Raptor Lake architecture with a Raptor Lake-U codename. It features 10 cores and 12 threads, which indicates a hybrid design mixing performance and efficiency cores. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS uses a 6 nm process from TSMC, based on the Zen 3+ architecture with a Rembrandt-R codename, and has 6 cores with 12 threads. The die size is listed at 208 mm² for AMD, while Intel’s die size is not provided.

Cache configurations differ notably. Intel allocates 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, with 12 MB of shared L3 cache. AMD provides 64 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, but a larger 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This larger L3 on the AMD chip likely contributes to its wins in data compression and encryption workloads, where larger working sets can be cached.

The memory controllers also diverge. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, while AMD is DDR5-only but lists a specific memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. PCIe connectivity favors AMD, which provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, versus Intel’s Gen 4 with only 8 lanes. This gives the AMD platform more headroom for discrete GPUs and high-speed storage. Integrated graphics differ, with Intel shipping Iris Xe Graphics 80EU and AMD using Radeon 660M.

Clock speeds and power targets show clear positioning. Intel has a 1600 MHz base clock and 4.70 GHz boost, but a low 15W TDP. AMD runs a 3.30 GHz base and 4.40 GHz boost with a higher 35W TDP. This explains the multi-core performance gap: AMD’s higher power budget allows it to sustain boost clocks across all cores, while Intel’s 15W envelope forces more aggressive power management. The AMD chip also has a later release date (August 2024 versus January 2023 for Intel), though the Intel part carries a launch MSRP of $309 while AMD’s launch price is not listed. Both are active production parts for the mobile segment, with Intel using the BGA 1744 socket and AMD using Socket FP7. Neither supports ECC memory, and both have locked multipliers.