AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Core i5-12400F Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS and Intel Core i5-12400F are both 6-core, 12-thread processors, but they target different market segments: mobile versus desktop. The benchmark data reveals a decisive performance advantage for the Intel part in nearly every workload, though the AMD chip claims a notable single-core victory in one key test. Both processors occupy the 73rd percentile among all CPUs, yet their average benchmark scores diverge, with the Ryzen 5 7533HS posting an average score of 19364 against the Core i5-12400F’s 19039.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head comparison is heavily lopsided, with the Intel Core i5-12400F winning 16 of the 17 benchmark comparisons. The largest margin comes in the PassMark floating-point math test, where Intel scores 46759 against AMD’s 27800, a difference of -40.5% for the Ryzen part. This indicates a substantial advantage in workloads that rely heavily on floating-point arithmetic, such as scientific simulations and certain rendering tasks. A similar pattern emerges in the PassMark find prime numbers test, where Intel’s score of 72 is 33.3% higher than AMD’s 48, suggesting better integer performance in specific algorithmic tasks.

In multi-threaded Cinebench tests, the Intel processor maintains a clear lead. In Cinebench R15 multicore, Intel scores 1759 versus AMD’s 1243, a -29.3% delta. The gap narrows slightly in Cinebench R20 multicore, where Intel’s 6980 beats AMD’s 5183 by -25.7%. However, the margin nearly evaporates in Cinebench R23 multicore, with Intel scoring 12380 and AMD scoring 12342, a mere -0.3% difference. This convergence suggests that the Ryzen 5 7533HS’s Zen 3+ architecture scales effectively with prolonged multi-threaded workloads, nearly matching the Alder Lake-S chip despite its lower power envelope.

The single-core results present a more nuanced picture. Intel dominates in Cinebench R15 singlecore (244 vs 175, -28.3%) and Cinebench R20 singlecore (985 vs 731, -25.8%). Yet in Cinebench R23 singlecore, the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS emerges victorious with a score of 1742 against Intel’s 1680, a +3.7% advantage. This is the only benchmark in the head-to-head set that the AMD processor wins, and it demonstrates that the Zen 3+ core can outperform the Alder Lake performance core under specific sustained single-threaded conditions.

PassMark tests further reinforce Intel’s dominance. In data compression, Intel scores 233327 versus AMD’s 168692, a -27.7% difference. The physics test shows Intel at 1202 against AMD’s 821, a -31.7% gap. Integer math scores are closer, with Intel’s 59995 beating AMD’s 50800 by -15.3%. The data encryption test shows a relatively modest -8.2% advantage for Intel (11679 vs 10718), while extended instructions favor Intel by -29.1% (15834 vs 11219). The multithread PassMark score places Intel at 19433 versus AMD’s 14520, a -25.3% gap, and single-thread performance favors Intel by -21.3% (3481 vs 2740).

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has an average benchmark score of 19364, which is higher than the Intel Core i5-12400F’s 19039. Despite this, the Intel processor wins the majority of individual head-to-head benchmarks.

Q: How do the two chips compare in Cinebench R23 multicore performance?

A: The scores are nearly identical, with the Intel Core i5-12400F scoring 12380 and the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS scoring 12342, a difference of only -0.3%. This represents the closest result in the entire head-to-head comparison.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS win any benchmark against the Intel Core i5-12400F?

A: Yes, the AMD processor wins the Cinebench R23 singlecore test with a score of 1742, giving it a +3.7% advantage over Intel’s 1680. This is the sole victory for AMD out of 17 comparative benchmarks.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between these two processors?

A: The largest gap is in the PassMark floating-point math test, where the Intel Core i5-12400F scores 46759 compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS’s 27800, representing a -40.5% delta for the AMD part.

Q: How do the processors compare in terms of single-threaded PassMark performance?

A: The Intel Core i5-12400F leads with a score of 3481, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS scores 2740, a difference of -21.3%. This indicates Intel’s advantage in typical single-threaded desktop tasks.

Q: Are both processors in the same performance percentile?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS and the Intel Core i5-12400F are ranked in the 73rd percentile among all CPUs, indicating they offer comparable overall positioning in the broader processor landscape.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is built on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, and uses a 6 nm process node from TSMC. This is a mobile-focused design with a die size of 208 mm². In contrast, the Intel Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake architecture, specifically Alder Lake-S, and is fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a smaller die size of 163 mm². The Intel part is a desktop processor, while the AMD chip is intended for mobile systems, which explains some of the design differences.

Cache hierarchies also differ significantly. The AMD processor features 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 cache per core, with 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Intel’s design allocates 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, with a larger 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger cache allocation on the Intel side likely contributes to its performance advantages in many tests, though the AMD chip’s architecture manages to close the gap in sustained multi-threaded workloads.

Both processors support DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, but the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS lists a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Intel Core i5-12400F does not specify a bandwidth figure. The AMD chip supports only DDR5, while the Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5, offering greater flexibility for system builders. Neither processor supports ECC memory, and both have locked multipliers.

Specification Differences

The most obvious specification difference is the market segment: the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is a mobile processor, while the Intel Core i5-12400F is a desktop part. The AMD chip has a TDP of 35 watts, whereas the Intel processor has a TDP of 65 watts, reflecting the mobile versus desktop power envelope distinction. Base clock speeds differ, with the AMD chip running at 3.30 GHz and the Intel chip at 2.50 GHz, though both boost to the same 4.40 GHz maximum.

The AMD processor uses the AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel chip uses the Intel Socket 1700. The integrated graphics also differ, with the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS featuring a Radeon 660M, while the Intel Core i5-12400F has no integrated graphics, as indicated by the null value. PCIe support varies as well: the AMD chip offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the Intel chip supports Gen 5 with 20 lanes, providing a bandwidth advantage for the Intel platform.

Release dates are substantially different, with the Intel Core i5-12400F launched on January 3, 2022, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS released on August 31, 2024. The Intel processor has a launch MSRP of $174, while the AMD chip has no listed launch MSRP. The process nodes diverge, with AMD using 6 nm from TSMC and Intel using 10 nm from its own foundry. The manufacturing foundries also differ, with AMD relying on TSMC and Intel using its internal fabrication.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the Intel Core i5-12400F for users seeking maximum performance across a broad range of workloads. With 16 wins out of 17 head-to-head benchmarks, the Intel processor demonstrates superiority in multi-threaded rendering, data compression, encryption, and floating-point operations. The desktop-oriented TDP of 65 watts and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory make it a versatile choice for system builders who prioritize raw throughput and platform flexibility. The absence of integrated graphics is a minor drawback for users without a discrete GPU, but the performance gains in nearly every measurable category outweigh this consideration.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is the better choice for mobile users who need a capable processor within a 35-watt power envelope. Its single victory in Cinebench R23 singlecore, where it outperforms the Intel chip by +3.7%, shows that its Zen 3+ architecture can deliver competitive single-threaded performance in sustained workloads. The inclusion of Radeon 660M integrated graphics means this processor can function without a dedicated GPU, making it suitable for thin-and-light laptops. Its nearly identical score in Cinebench R23 multicore, within -0.3% of the Intel part, proves that it can hold its own in prolonged multi-threaded tasks despite the lower TDP.

Users who require maximum performance in a desktop system should select the Intel Core i5-12400F. Its higher scores in PassMark multithread (19433 vs 14520) and floating-point math (46759 vs 27800) indicate significant advantages in compute-heavy applications. Conversely, users who prioritize energy efficiency and mobile form factors should choose the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS, as it offers competitive performance in a much lower power envelope with the added benefit of integrated graphics. The final decision hinges on the intended use case: raw desktop performance versus efficient mobile computing.