AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Core i3-14100T Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS and Intel Core i3-14100T are both 35 W processors, but they target entirely different platforms and deliver contrasting performance profiles. The Ryzen 5 7533HS is a mobile processor for AMD Socket FP7 laptops, while the Core i3-14100T is a desktop chip for Intel Socket 1700. Benchmark results show the AMD part wins the majority of tests, taking 12 of 17 head-to-head comparisons, while the Intel part wins 5. The AMD processor also holds a higher overall percentile rank at 73 compared to Intel’s 71, and its average benchmark score of 19364 exceeds Intel’s 17648. This analysis breaks down where each processor excels, what separates them architecturally, and how their recorded performance compares in specific workloads.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS dominates multi-threaded and data-heavy workloads. It wins all three Cinebench multi-core tests, including the R23 multi-core test with a score of 12342 against Intel’s 11612. It also wins every single-core Cinebench test, taking the R23 single-core test 1742 to 1639. In PassMark tests, the AMD chip wins data compression (168692 vs 152636), data encryption (10718 vs 7881), extended instructions (11219 vs 10414), integer math (50800 vs 40292), multithread (14520 vs 13662), and random string sorting (17669 vs 15579). These results indicate the Ryzen 5 7533HS is the stronger choice for productivity tasks, compilation, and any workload that scales with thread count.

The Intel Core i3-14100T wins a narrower set of tests, but they are significant. Its PassMark single-thread score is 3498 against AMD’s 2740, a 21.7% advantage. It also wins PassMark physics (973 vs 821), floating point math (31379 vs 27800), and find prime numbers (56 vs 48). The Intel chip’s wins are concentrated in single-threaded responsiveness, physics simulation, and floating-point arithmetic. For a desktop user running lightly threaded applications or software that relies on strong per-core floating-point performance, the Core i3-14100T has a measurable edge.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies and manufacturing processes. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS uses the Zen 3+ architecture with the codename Rembrandt-R, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i3-14100T uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-R, built on a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD chip’s die size is 208 mm², while the Intel chip’s die is smaller at 163 mm².

Core and thread counts differ substantially. The Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Core i3-14100T has 4 cores and 8 threads. Cache layouts also differ. The AMD processor has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel processor has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. Despite having fewer cores, the Intel chip carries more L2 cache per core.

Memory support separates the two as well. The AMD chip supports DDR5 memory only, with dual-channel access and a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded in the database. The AMD chip does not support ECC memory; the Intel chip does. PCIe connectivity also differs: the AMD part offers Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, while the Intel part offers Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

Integrated graphics and market positioning diverge. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS includes Radeon 660M graphics and is classified as a mobile part. The Intel Core i3-14100T includes UHD Graphics 730 and is classified as a desktop part. Both parts have locked multipliers, so neither supports user overclocking. The AMD processor was released later, with a release date of 2024-08-31, while the Intel processor launched on 2024-01-07. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $134, while no launch MSRP is recorded for the AMD chip.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Ryzen 5 7533HS leads consistently in the Cinebench suite. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, it scores 1243 against 1170, a 6.2% advantage. In R15 single-core, it wins 175 to 165, a 6.1% lead. The R20 multi-core test shows 5183 against 4877, a 6.3% margin, and R20 single-core shows 731 against 688, also 6.3%. The R23 multi-core test repeats the 6.3% pattern with 12342 vs 11612, and R23 single-core again shows 6.3% with 1742 vs 1639. Across all six Cinebench tests, the AMD chip holds a consistent 6.1% to 6.3% lead.

The PassMark suite reveals where the AMD chip pulls further ahead. Data encryption is the largest win for the Ryzen 5 7533HS at 10718 vs 7881, a 36% advantage. Integer math follows with 50800 vs 40292, a 26.1% lead. Random string sorting shows 17669 vs 15579, a 13.4% margin. Data compression is 168692 vs 152636, a 10.5% lead. Extended instructions show 11219 vs 10414, a 7.7% edge. The multithread test shows 14520 vs 13662, a 6.3% advantage, matching the Cinebench margins.

The Core i3-14100T wins its tests by larger margins in the opposite direction. The PassMark single-thread test is its biggest win at 3498 vs 2740, a 21.7% advantage. PassMark physics shows 973 vs 821, a 15.6% lead. Floating point math is 31379 vs 27800, an 11.4% margin. Find prime numbers is 56 vs 48, a 14.3% lead. These results show the Intel chip’s strengths are specific but pronounced, particularly in single-threaded and floating-point workloads.

Looking at the nearest rival data provides additional context. The Ryzen 5 7533HS sits close to the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, which has an average score of 19368 and a delta of 0%. It is also within 0.7% of the Intel Core i7-8700K, which scores 19238. The Core i3-14100T sits near the Intel Core i3-13100F at 17653 with a 0% delta, and within 0.3% of the AMD EPYC 9374F at 17693. The AMD chip’s average score of 19364 places it in a higher performance class than the Intel chip’s 17648, a difference of roughly 10% in average benchmark score.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core i3-14100T has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Which processor is faster in single-threaded performance?

A: The Intel Core i3-14100T wins the PassMark single-thread test with a score of 3498 against AMD’s 2740, a 21.7% advantage. However, the AMD chip wins all Cinebench single-core tests, including R23 single-core at 1742 vs 1639, a 6.3% lead.

Q: Which processor wins in multi-threaded workloads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS wins every Cinebench multi-core test and the PassMark multithread test. Its R23 multi-core score is 12342 against Intel’s 11612, and its PassMark multithread score is 14520 against 13662.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS supports DDR5 only. The Intel Core i3-14100T supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses, and the AMD chip has a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i3-14100T supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS does not.

Q: What are the process nodes for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i3-14100T is built on a 10 nm process at Intel.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split based on platform and workload. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is the better processor for multi-threaded productivity. It wins all Cinebench multi-core tests, PassMark multithread, integer math, data compression, data encryption, extended instructions, and random string sorting. Its 12 wins out of 17 head-to-head benchmarks and higher average benchmark score of 19364 versus 17648 make it the stronger overall performer in the database records.

The Intel Core i3-14100T is the better choice for single-threaded responsiveness and floating-point work. Its 21.7% lead in PassMark single-thread, along with wins in physics, floating point math, and find prime numbers, gives it a distinct profile for those specific tasks. Desktop users who prioritize per-core speed and ECC memory support will find the Intel chip more suitable.

The AMD chip’s 6-core, 12-thread configuration, larger 16 MB L3 cache, and 6 nm process give it a structural advantage in parallel workloads. The Intel chip’s higher per-core L2 cache, 80 KB per core, and Gen 5 PCIe support serve its desktop role. Neither processor is unlocked, so both are fixed at their factory clock behavior. The choice comes down to platform: mobile users on AMD Socket FP7 get the Ryzen 5 7533HS, while desktop builders on Intel Socket 1700 get the Core i3-14100T.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS | Intel Core i3-14100T |

|----------------|---------------------|------------------------|

| Cores | 6 | 4 |

| Threads | 12 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 3.30 GHz | 2.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.40 GHz | 4.40 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 35 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Raptor Lake-R |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 208 mm² | 163 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 660M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2024-08-31 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $134 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

| Part Number | 100-000001632 (FP7), 100-000001634 (FP7r2) | SRMX0 |