AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Core i3-14100F Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i3-14100F dominates the majority of the head-to-head comparisons, winning 14 of the 17 recorded tests. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS claims only 3 wins, but those wins are substantial in their respective workloads. The data shows a clear split: Intel leads in most compute-heavy and single-threaded tasks, while AMD counters in specific data-processing and encryption workloads.

The most decisive Intel victories come in single-threaded performance. In PassMark single-thread testing, the Core i3-14100F scores 3778 against the Ryzen 5 7533HS's 2740, a 27.5% advantage. The same pattern appears in Cinebench R23 single-core, where Intel leads 1847 to 1742, a 5.7% margin. The Intel chip also wins Cinebench R15 single-core (186 vs 175, 5.9% ahead) and Cinebench R20 single-core (775 vs 731, 5.7% ahead). These results indicate a meaningful IPC advantage for the Raptor Lake architecture in lightly threaded workloads.

Multi-core Cinebench results also favor Intel, though by smaller margins. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Core i3-14100F scores 13084 versus 12342 for the Ryzen 5 7533HS, a 5.7% lead. The pattern repeats in Cinebench R15 multi-core (1318 vs 1243, 5.7% ahead) and Cinebench R20 multi-core (5495 vs 5183, 5.7% ahead). PassMark multi-thread testing shows Intel ahead as well (15420 vs 14520, 5.8% ahead). This is notable because the AMD chip has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel part has 4 cores and 8 threads. Intel achieves higher multi-core throughput with fewer cores.

The largest Intel margins appear in specialized workloads. PassMark physics shows Intel at 1077 versus 821, a 23.8% advantage. Floating-point math favors Intel by 21.4% (35370 vs 27800). Prime number finding favors Intel by 21.3% (61 vs 48). Extended instructions go to Intel by 6.4% (11984 vs 11219). Data compression favors Intel by 4.2% (176106 vs 168692).

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS wins are concentrated in three areas. Data encryption shows the largest AMD margin: 10718 versus 8922, a 20.1% advantage. Integer math goes to AMD by 12% (50800 vs 45357). Random string sorting is nearly even, with AMD ahead 17669 to 17596, a 0.4% margin. These wins suggest the Zen 3+ architecture handles certain integer and encryption workloads more efficiently, despite losing most other comparisons.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i3-14100F is the stronger processor for general-purpose desktop workloads. Its single-thread leadership of 27.5% in PassMark single-thread and 5.7% in Cinebench R23 single-core indicates faster response in applications that rely on one or two cores. Physics simulation, floating-point math, and prime number calculations all show double-digit Intel advantages, making it the better choice for scientific computing, physics-based rendering, and numerical analysis.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS wins in data encryption by 20.1%, which points to a hardware advantage for cryptographic workloads. Its 12% lead in integer math suggests strength in general arithmetic operations. The random string sorting win, while narrow at 0.4%, still shows AMD handling sorting algorithms marginally better. These wins make the Ryzen 5 7533HS the preferable processor for encryption-heavy tasks and integer-focused workloads.

The benchmark data shows Intel winning the PassMark multi-thread test (15420 vs 14520, 5.8% ahead) and all three Cinebench multi-core tests by 5.7%, despite having fewer cores and threads. The Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads, but the Core i3-14100F's 4 cores and 8 threads deliver higher scores. This indicates the Intel architecture extracts more performance per thread in multi-threaded scenarios.

For media encoding and compression tasks, Intel leads in data compression by 4.2%. The AMD chip counters in encryption, but the overall benchmark distribution favors Intel across a wider range of workload types. The recorded data supports Intel as the more versatile performer, with AMD holding specific niches.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturing processes and design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS uses a 6 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel Core i3-14100F uses a 10 nm process from Intel's own foundry. The AMD chip has a die size of 208 mm², compared to 163 mm² for Intel.

Core configurations differ significantly. The Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads, based on the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename. The Core i3-14100F has 4 cores and 8 threads, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename. The AMD processor belongs to the 7000 series, while Intel belongs to the Core 14th Gen.

Cache hierarchies also differ. The AMD chip has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has a larger L2 cache allocation per core, which contributes to its single-thread performance advantage.

Memory support varies. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS supports DDR5 only, with dual-channel memory and a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel Core i3-14100F supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also with dual-channel memory, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded in the database. ECC memory support favors Intel, which supports ECC while the AMD chip does not.

PCIe connectivity differs. The AMD chip uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The Intel chip uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part offers a newer PCIe generation, while AMD provides more total lanes.

Integrated graphics present another distinction. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS includes a Radeon 660M integrated GPU, while the Intel Core i3-14100F has no integrated graphics (listed as N/A). This makes the AMD chip a self-contained mobile solution, while the Intel desktop part requires a discrete graphics card.

Clock speeds and power targets differ as well. The AMD chip has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with a TDP of 35 watts. The Intel chip has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a TDP of 58 watts. The Intel part runs at higher clocks and consumes more power, consistent with its desktop positioning. The AMD part is a mobile processor with a lower power envelope.

The market segments reflect these differences. AMD targets mobile with the Socket FP7 platform, while Intel targets desktop with Socket 1700. Release dates show the Intel chip launched on 2024-01-07, while the AMD chip launched on 2024-08-31. The Intel part has a recorded launch MSRP of $109. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

The Verdict

The benchmark data clearly favors the Intel Core i3-14100F for users who prioritize raw performance across a broad range of workloads. Intel wins 14 of 17 head-to-head tests, including all Cinebench multi-core and single-core tests, all PassMark single-thread tests, and the PassMark multi-thread test. The Intel chip leads in physics by 23.8%, floating-point math by 21.4%, prime number finding by 21.3%, and data compression by 4.2%. These are substantial margins in compute-intensive tasks.

The Intel processor achieves this with fewer cores: 4 cores and 8 threads versus 6 cores and 12 threads for AMD. Higher clock speeds, with a boost of 4.70 GHz versus 4.40 GHz, and a larger per-core L2 cache of 1.25 MB versus 512 KB, support its performance lead. The Intel part also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory and includes ECC support, adding flexibility for workstation use.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS wins in specific workloads: data encryption by 20.1%, integer math by 12%, and random string sorting by 0.4%. For users whose primary workloads involve encryption or integer-heavy processing, the AMD chip offers a measurable advantage. Its 35-watt TDP also indicates lower power consumption than Intel's 58-watt TDP, which suits mobile deployments. The integrated Radeon 660M graphics eliminate the need for a separate GPU in the AMD platform.

The average benchmark scores place the AMD chip at 19364 with a 73rd percentile ranking, while the Intel chip averages 18519 with a 72nd percentile ranking. The AMD chip has a higher average score, but this reflects its wins in encryption and integer math, which are not represented in the head-to-head Cinebench tests that Intel wins.

For desktop users seeking maximum compute performance, the Intel Core i3-14100F is the data-backed choice. For mobile users or those prioritizing encryption and integer workloads, the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS provides specific advantages. The Intel chip also offers PCIe Gen 5 support and a newer memory interface, while AMD counters with PCIe Gen 4, more lanes, and integrated graphics.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more head-to-head benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core i3-14100F wins 14 of 17 head-to-head tests, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS wins 3.

Q: How much faster is the Intel chip in single-threaded performance?

A: In PassMark single-thread testing, the Intel Core i3-14100F scores 3778 versus 2740 for the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS, a 27.5% advantage. In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel leads 1847 to 1742, a 5.7% margin.

Q: Does the AMD processor have more cores than the Intel part?

A: Yes. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core i3-14100F has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What workloads does the AMD processor win?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS wins in data encryption (10718 vs 8922, 20.1% ahead), integer math (50800 vs 45357, 12% ahead), and random string sorting (17669 vs 17596, 0.4% ahead).

Q: Does either processor include integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS includes a Radeon 660M integrated GPU. The Intel Core i3-14100F has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS supports DDR5 only, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel Core i3-14100F supports both DDR4 and DDR5, and supports ECC memory, which AMD does not.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS | Intel Core i3-14100F |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 4 |

| Threads | 12 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 3.30 GHz | 3.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.40 GHz | 4.70 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 58 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Raptor Lake-R |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 208 mm² | 163 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 660M | N/A |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2024-08-31 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $109 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

| Part Number | 100-000001632(FP7), 100-000001634(FP7r2) | SRMX2 |