AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Core 7 150HL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database does not contain direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS and the Intel Core 7 150HL. The recorded data for the Intel processor is entirely empty, meaning there are no measured scores for any of the standard test suites. This creates an unusual analytical situation: one processor has a full set of 17 benchmark entries, while the other has zero recorded measurements.

For the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS, the available data shows a consistent pattern across both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score reaches 12,342, while the single-core score sits at 1,742. The Cinebench R20 results follow the same shape: 5,183 multi-core and 731 single-core. The R15 test shows 1,243 multi-core and 175 single-core. These numbers place the AMD part at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 19,364.

The nearest rivals for the Ryzen 5 7533HS provide context for its positioning. The Intel Core Ultra 5 226V scores 19,368 on average, a delta of 0 percent. The Intel Core i5-1345U averages 19,411, which is 0.2 percent higher. The Intel Core i7-8700K averages 19,238, or 0.7 percent lower. The Intel Core i7-10700F averages 19,499, which is 0.7 percent higher. These deltas are all within roughly one percent, indicating that the Ryzen 5 7533HS sits in a tightly contested performance band.

PassMark results for the AMD chip show strong integer and floating-point throughput. Integer math scores 50,800, floating-point math scores 27,800, and extended instructions score 11,219. Data compression reaches 168,692, while data encryption hits 10,718. Random string sorting produces 17,669, and find prime numbers yields 48. The multi-thread PassMark score is 14,520, with a physics score of 821. Single-thread performance is recorded twice in the database, both times at 2,740.

Because the Intel Core 7 150HL has no benchmark entries, the head-to-head comparison cannot be quantified. The wins column shows zero for both processors, confirming that no direct test results exist in the database. Any analysis of relative performance must therefore rely on architectural specifications rather than measured outcomes.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturers and use fundamentally different designs. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS belongs to the 7000 series and uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the codename Rembrandt-R. It is built on a 6 nm process node by TSMC, with a die size of 208 mm². The Intel Core 7 150HL uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the codename Raptor Lake-PS, built on a 10 nm process node by Intel Foundry. No die size is recorded for the Intel part.

Core and thread counts differ substantially. The AMD processor has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel processor has 14 cores and 20 threads. This is a significant structural difference: the Intel part has more than twice the core count and 8 additional threads. However, the AMD chip has a higher base clock of 3.30 GHz compared to the Intel base clock of 2.40 GHz. The boost clocks reverse this relationship: the Intel chip boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the AMD chip boosts to 4.40 GHz.

Cache hierarchies also diverge. The AMD processor uses 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor uses 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has a larger total cache allocation at each level, though the per-core L1 difference is modest.

Memory support shows a clear split. The AMD chip supports DDR5 memory only, with dual-channel access and a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, also dual-channel, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded in the database. Neither processor supports ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity differs in lane count. The AMD processor provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The Intel processor provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). This gives the AMD part more than twice the PCIe lane availability.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD chip uses Radeon 660M graphics. The Intel chip uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units. The socket types are entirely different: AMD Socket FP7 for the Ryzen, Intel Socket 1700 for the Core 7. The market segments also differ: the AMD processor is classified as Mobile, while the Intel processor is classified as Desktop. Both are marked as Active in production status, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

Without benchmark data for the Intel Core 7 150HL, the analysis splits between measured results for the AMD processor and architectural advantages for the Intel processor.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS wins on measured performance grounds. Its recorded scores span every major test suite, and the 73rd percentile ranking indicates it outperforms roughly three-quarters of all CPUs in the database. The 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth is a concrete measured advantage, and the 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes provide more expansion headroom. Its 6 nm process node, smaller than the Intel 10 nm node, suggests higher transistor density per area.

The Intel Core 7 150HL wins on paper specifications. The 14-core, 20-thread configuration offers substantially more parallel compute resources than the 6-core, 12-thread AMD chip. The 5.00 GHz boost clock is higher than the AMD boost of 4.40 GHz, which could benefit lightly threaded workloads. The 24 MB of L3 cache and 2 MB of L2 per core are larger than the AMD equivalents. The Intel chip also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering broader memory compatibility.

The lack of Intel benchmark data means the database cannot confirm whether those architectural advantages translate into actual performance wins. The AMD chip has proven scores; the Intel chip has none. For single-threaded tasks, the higher Intel boost clock suggests potential advantage, but no measured evidence exists. For multi-threaded tasks, the Intel core-count advantage is theoretically significant, but again unverified.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: Yes, it has 17 recorded benchmark entries across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and multiple PassMark tests, with an average benchmark score of 19,364.

Q: Are there any benchmark scores for the Intel Core 7 150HL?

A: No. The database contains zero benchmark entries for the Intel Core 7 150HL, so its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

Q: How does the AMD processor rank among all CPUs?

A: The Ryzen 5 7533HS sits at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs in the database, meaning it performs better than 73 percent of all recorded processors.

Q: What are the nearest rivals to the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS?

A: The closest competitors by average benchmark score are the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (19,368, 0 percent delta), Intel Core i5-1345U (19,411, -0.2 percent), Intel Core i7-8700K (19,238, 0.7 percent), and Intel Core i7-10700F (19,499, -0.7 percent).

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS supports DDR5 only. The Intel Core 7 150HL supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD processor has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel processor has 14 cores and 20 threads.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS | Intel Core 7 150HL |

|----------------|-------------------|-------------------|

| Cores | 6 | 14 |

| Threads | 12 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 3.30 GHz | 2.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.40 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| TDP | 35 | 45 |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Raptor Lake |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 10 nm |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes | Gen 4, 8 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 660M | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2024-08-31 | 2024-04-07 |

| Benchmark Entries | 17 | 0 |

| Percentile | 73 | 50 |

The Verdict

The data presents a one-sided measurement situation. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a complete benchmark profile, while the Intel Core 7 150HL has none. Any verdict must acknowledge this asymmetry.

For users who prioritize verified performance, the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is the only option with recorded evidence. Its 73rd percentile ranking, combined with concrete scores across Cinebench and PassMark, demonstrates a capable processor that competes within one percent of several established Intel desktop chips like the Core i7-8700K and Core i7-10700F.

For users who prioritize raw specifications, the Intel Core 7 150HL offers a compelling paper profile. The 14-core, 20-thread configuration, 5.00 GHz boost clock, and 24 MB of L3 cache suggest strong potential for multi-threaded and burst workloads. Its 45 W TDP indicates higher power draw than the AMD 35 W TDP, which aligns with its desktop market segment.

The database records the Intel processor at the 50th percentile, but this figure carries no benchmark support. It appears to be a default or placeholder value rather than a measured outcome. The AMD processor's 73rd percentile is backed by 17 test results.

The choice depends on whether the buyer values measured results or unverified specifications. The AMD chip delivers proven performance with lower power consumption, higher memory bandwidth, and more PCIe lanes. The Intel chip delivers a higher core count, higher boost clock, larger cache, and broader memory compatibility, but without any recorded performance data to confirm its capabilities. The database cannot currently validate the Intel processor's real-world behavior.