AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Core 5 320 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results split the two processors into clear camps. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS wins 4 of the 17 recorded tests, while the Intel Core 5 320 takes 13. The most dramatic single result favors AMD: in Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Ryzen scores 12,342 against Intel’s 6,197, a 99.2% advantage. This is the largest delta in the entire comparison and shows that for sustained all-core rendering workloads, the AMD part is in a different tier.

However, Intel dominates single-threaded and lightly threaded tests. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the Core 5 320 scores 276 versus 175 for AMD, a 36.6% lead. The gap narrows in Cinebench R20 single-core (771 vs 731, a 5.2% lead) and Cinebench R23 single-core (1,926 vs 1,742, a 9.6% lead). PassMark single-thread shows the largest single-core margin: Intel at 4,045 versus AMD at 2,740, a 32.3% difference.

Beyond rendering, Intel wins most PassMark sub-tests. Floating-point math goes to Intel by 34.5% (42,440 vs 27,800). Find prime numbers shows Intel at 110 versus AMD at 48, a 56.4% lead. Physics simulation favors Intel by 32.8% (1,221 vs 821). Extended instructions go to Intel by 15.4% (13,262 vs 11,219). Data encryption is close, Intel ahead by 2.4% (10,984 vs 10,718). Random string sorting is nearly even, Intel ahead by 2% (18,038 vs 17,669). PassMark multithread also goes to Intel, 15,450 vs 14,520, a 6% lead.

AMD’s other wins are concentrated in integer-heavy work. PassMark integer math goes to AMD by a wide 57.2% margin (50,800 vs 32,323). Data compression favors AMD by 13.4% (168,692 vs 148,779). In Cinebench R15 multi-core, AMD leads by 17.9% (1,243 vs 1,054). The Cinebench R20 multi-core test is the only multi-core result that does not favor AMD: Intel wins 5,462 vs 5,183, a 5.1% margin, which is inconsistent with the R23 result and likely reflects different workload scaling.

The overall average benchmark scores differ modestly: AMD’s average is 19,364, placing it at the 73rd percentile of all CPUs, while Intel’s average is 18,023, at the 72nd percentile. AMD’s nearest rival by average score is the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (19,368, a 0% delta), while Intel’s nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 (17,994, a 0.2% delta). The data shows that AMD’s aggregate position is slightly higher, but Intel wins the majority of individual tests.

Architecture Differences

The two chips use fundamentally different designs. AMD’s Ryzen 5 7533HS is built on TSMC’s 6 nm node with a die size of 208 mm², using the Zen 3+ architecture with the codename Rembrandt-R. It is a 6-core, 12-thread part, meaning each core supports two threads via SMT. Intel’s Core 5 320 is built on Intel’s 3 nm process with the Wildcat Lake codename. It is also a 6-core part but has only 6 threads, so it lacks simultaneous multithreading entirely.

Clock speeds tell a similar story. AMD’s base clock is 3.30 GHz with a boost of 4.40 GHz. Intel starts at a much lower 1.50 GHz base but boosts to 4.60 GHz. The lower base clock and higher boost clock on Intel indicate a design that relies on aggressive single-core turbo behavior rather than sustained all-core frequency. AMD’s higher base clock and 12 threads favor sustained multi-threaded throughput.

Cache configurations differ substantially. AMD provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. Intel provides 192 KB of L1 total, 2.5 MB of L2 total, and 6 MB of shared L3. This means AMD has far more aggregate cache, especially at the L3 level, which aligns with its stronger multi-core rendering results. Intel’s smaller cache pool is paired with a single-channel memory bus, while AMD uses dual-channel memory. Peak memory bandwidth reflects this: AMD lists 76.8 GB/s versus Intel’s 59.7 GB/s.

Memory support also differs. AMD supports DDR5 only, while Intel supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Neither chip supports ECC memory. PCIe lanes are another split: AMD provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), Intel provides Gen 4 with only 6 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ as well: AMD uses Radeon 660M, while Intel uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores.

Process node, foundry, and cache all point to different design targets. AMD’s 6 nm process and 208 mm² die are older and larger. Intel’s 3 nm process is more advanced, but the lack of SMT and single-channel memory limit its multi-threaded ceiling. The die size for Intel is not recorded in the database, so no direct area comparison is possible.

The release dates are far apart. AMD launched on 2024-08-31, Intel on 2026-04-15. Both are currently marked as Active in production. Intel’s launch MSRP is $340; AMD has no recorded launch MSRP. Both parts are locked (multiplier not unlocked) and target the mobile segment.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS wins where thread count and cache matter most. Cinebench R23 multi-core is its signature result, with a 99.2% lead over Intel. This indicates that long-duration, heavily parallel rendering workloads will complete in roughly half the time on AMD. Integer math also favors AMD by 57.2%, which matters for compression, code compilation, and database workloads that rely on integer arithmetic. Data compression is another AMD win by 13.4%, reinforcing the pattern that AMD handles multi-threaded, integer-heavy tasks well.

The Intel Core 5 320 wins in almost everything else. Single-core performance is its strongest suit, with PassMark single-thread showing a 32.3% lead. This translates to snappier response in lightly threaded applications, such as web browsing, office documents, and general desktop use. Floating-point math favors Intel by 34.5%, which benefits scientific computing and financial modeling that use FP arithmetic. Physics simulation favors Intel by 32.8%, and extended instructions by 15.4%. Prime number finding shows Intel at 110 versus AMD’s 48, a 56.4% lead, which is relevant for cryptography-related workloads.

Intel also wins the mixed PassMark multithread test by 6%, despite losing the Cinebench R23 multi-core test by a huge margin. This discrepancy suggests that PassMark’s multithread workload is not as purely parallel as Cinebench R23 and may rely on per-core efficiency. Data encryption is a near tie, with Intel ahead by just 2.4%. Random string sorting is also close, Intel ahead by 2%. The Cinebench R20 multi-core result is an outlier: Intel wins by 5.1%, which contradicts the R15 and R23 multi-core results. This may reflect different instruction usage or thermal behavior in that specific test.

For users prioritizing rendering, compression, or integer throughput, the AMD part is the clear choice. For users prioritizing single-thread responsiveness, floating-point math, or physics simulation, Intel wins decisively. The overall win count (13 for Intel, 4 for AMD) is misleading because the largest single delta (99.2% in R23 multi-core) is an AMD win, while many of Intel’s wins are smaller in magnitude.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has higher multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS scores 12,342 versus Intel’s 6,197, a 99.2% advantage. This is the largest performance gap in the head-to-head data.

Q: How much faster is Intel in single-threaded PassMark?

A: Intel scores 4,045 versus AMD’s 2,740, a 32.3% lead. The same margin appears in both PassMark single-thread and singlethread tests.

Q: Do both processors have the same core count?

A: Yes, both have 6 cores. AMD has 12 threads due to SMT, while Intel has 6 threads with no SMT.

Q: Which processor has more cache?

A: AMD has 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. Intel has 192 KB L1 total, 2.5 MB L2 total, and 6 MB shared L3.

Q: What memory bandwidth does each support?

A: AMD supports dual-channel DDR5 with 76.8 GB/s. Intel supports single-channel DDR5 or LPDDR5X with 59.7 GB/s.

Q: What is Intel’s launch MSRP?

A: Intel’s launch MSRP is $340. AMD has no recorded launch MSRP in the database.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS | Intel Core 5 320 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 6 |

| Threads | 12 | 6 |

| Base clock | 3.30 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.40 GHz | 4.60 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Not recorded |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Wildcat Lake |

| Process node | 6 nm (TSMC) | 3 nm (Intel) |

| Die size | 208 mm² | Not recorded |

| L1 cache | 64 KB per core | 192 KB total |

| L2 cache | 512 KB per core | 2.5 MB total |

| L3 cache | 16 MB shared | 6 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 lanes | Gen 4, 6 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 660M | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) |

| Release date | 2024-08-31 | 2026-04-15 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $340 |

The Verdict

The data presents a split decision based on workload type. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS delivers the single largest performance win in the comparison: a 99.2% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core. It also wins integer math by 57.2% and data compression by 13.4%. Users who run long, parallel, integer-heavy tasks such as video rendering, code compilation, or data compression should choose AMD based on these results. The 12-thread configuration and 16 MB L3 cache directly support this advantage.

The Intel Core 5 320 wins the majority of tests, but most of its wins are in single-threaded or moderately threaded workloads. Its 32.3% single-thread lead in PassMark, 34.5% floating-point lead, and 32.8% physics lead make it the better choice for general desktop responsiveness, scientific computing, and simulation tasks. The 15 W TDP also indicates a power-efficient design, though no power consumption measurements are recorded. Intel’s higher boost clock of 4.60 GHz and its 3 nm process support its single-core strength.

The average benchmark scores place AMD slightly higher (19,364 vs 18,023), and AMD’s 73rd percentile versus Intel’s 72nd percentile confirms a marginal aggregate edge. However, the distribution of wins is lopsided: Intel wins 13 tests, AMD wins 4. The practical choice depends on whether the user’s primary workload is multi-threaded rendering (AMD) or single-threaded and floating-point work (Intel). Both parts are active in production, both are locked, and both target mobile systems. The database does not record any ECC support for either, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.