AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Core 5 130UL Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data presents an asymmetric comparison. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a full suite of 17 benchmark results, while the Intel Core 5 130UL has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Consequently, all performance wins in this matchup belong to the AMD processor by default, as there is no measured data for Intel to contest any category.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS delivers wins across every workload type represented in the database. In single-threaded tasks, it shows a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1742 and a Passmark single-thread score of 2740. For multi-threaded workloads, it produces a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12342 and a Passmark multithread score of 14520. Specialized workload categories also show strong results, including Passmark data compression at 168692, data encryption at 10718, and extended instructions at 11219.

The Intel Core 5 130UL holds no recorded wins because the database contains no benchmark entries for this processor. Its percentile ranking versus all CPUs sits at 50, compared to the AMD part's 73rd percentile. Without measured scores, the only factual statement about the Intel chip's performance is that it has no data in the database, making any head-to-head win analysis impossible beyond the AMD result set.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design lineages. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the Rembrandt-R codename, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 5 130UL uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-PS codename, manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel. These process nodes represent a significant difference in transistor density, with the AMD part using a more advanced lithography.

Core configurations differ substantially. The AMD chip has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel chip has 10 cores and 12 threads. Both processors support 12 threads, but the Intel part achieves this with a higher core count, implying a hybrid core arrangement typical of Raptor Lake designs. The AMD part uses a uniform 6-core layout.

Cache hierarchies show distinct approaches. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 130UL has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. The Intel part has larger per-core L1 and L2 allocations, while the AMD part has a larger L3 pool.

Clock speeds and power characteristics differ markedly. The AMD processor has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with a 35 W TDP. The Intel processor has a base clock of 1.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a 15 W TDP. The Intel chip boosts higher but runs at a much lower base frequency and draws less power.

Memory and I/O support also diverge. The AMD part supports DDR5 memory only, with dual-channel configuration and a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but the database records no memory bandwidth figure for it. PCIe connectivity differs: the AMD chip provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel chip provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS carries a Radeon 660M. The Intel Core 5 130UL carries Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units. Socket compatibility is entirely different, with the AMD part using AMD Socket FP7 and the Intel part using Intel Socket 1700. The AMD chip has a die size of 208 mm², while no die size is recorded for the Intel part. The AMD part belongs to the 7000 series and was released on 2024-08-31, while the Intel part has no series designation and was released earlier on 2024-04-07.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Since the Intel Core 5 130UL has no benchmark scores in the database, the head-to-head comparison must rely entirely on the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS results. The database records 17 benchmark outcomes for the AMD part, each representing a measurable performance data point.

In Cinebench testing, the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS shows a multi-core score of 12342 in R23, 5183 in R20, and 1243 in R15. Single-core scores are 1742 in R23, 731 in R20, and 175 in R15. These figures indicate a consistent scaling pattern across Cinebench versions, with the multi-core performance roughly seven times the single-core result in each iteration.

Passmark results show a broader workload spectrum. The multithread score is 14520, while the single-thread score is 2740. Integer math reaches 50800, floating-point math reaches 27800, and extended instructions score 11219. Data compression scores 168692, data encryption scores 10718, and random string sorting scores 17669. Physics processing scores 821, and find prime numbers scores 48.

The average benchmark score for the AMD part is 19364. Its percentile ranking against all CPUs is 73. Nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V with an average score of 19368 and a delta of 0 percent, the Intel Core i5-1345U with an average of 19411 and a delta of -0.2 percent, the Intel Core i7-8700K with an average of 19238 and a delta of 0.7 percent, and the Intel Core i7-10700F with an average of 19499 and a delta of -0.7 percent. These deltas show the AMD chip sits within a tight performance band, essentially matching the Core Ultra 5 226V and trading places with the others by less than one percent.

For the Intel Core 5 130UL, the database records zero benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of zero, and no nearest rivals. The percentile ranking of 50 versus all CPUs provides no direct performance score to compare. The only factual statement available is that no measured performance data exists for this processor in the database.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several recorded specification fields. Core count differs: 6 for AMD versus 10 for Intel. Thread count is identical at 12 for both. Base clock frequencies differ substantially: 3.30 GHz for AMD versus 1.60 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks also differ: 4.40 GHz for AMD versus 4.70 GHz for Intel.

TDP ratings show a large gap: 35 W for AMD versus 15 W for Intel. Socket types are incompatible: AMD Socket FP7 versus Intel Socket 1700. Architecture names differ: Zen 3+ versus Raptor Lake. Codename differs: Rembrandt-R versus Raptor Lake-PS. Process nodes differ: 6 nm versus 10 nm. Foundry differs: TSMC versus Intel.

Cache configurations differ per core and total. L1 cache: 64 KB per core for AMD versus 80 KB per core for Intel. L2 cache: 512 KB per core for AMD versus 1.25 MB per core for Intel. L3 cache: 16 MB shared for AMD versus 12 MB shared for Intel.

Memory support differs: DDR5 only for AMD versus DDR4 and DDR5 for Intel. Memory bandwidth is recorded only for AMD at 76.8 GB/s, with no figure for Intel. PCIe lane counts differ: 20 lanes for AMD versus 8 lanes for Intel, both Gen 4. Integrated graphics units differ: Radeon 660M for AMD versus Iris Xe Graphics 80EU for Intel.

Market segment classification differs: Mobile for AMD versus Desktop for Intel. Production status is Active for both. Release dates differ: 2024-08-31 for AMD versus 2024-04-07 for Intel. Neither processor has a recorded launch MSRP, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part has a recorded die size of 208 mm², while the Intel part has no die size recorded. The AMD part number is listed, while the Intel part number is recorded as unknown.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 5 130UL has 10 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores. Both processors support 12 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 5 130UL has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, compared to 4.40 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS. The AMD part has a higher base clock at 3.30 GHz versus 1.60 GHz for Intel.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a TDP of 35 W, while the Intel Core 5 130UL has a TDP of 15 W. The Intel part draws less power by design.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 16 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Core 5 130UL has 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS supports DDR5 only, while the Intel Core 5 130UL supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

Q: Which processor has a higher benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS ranks in the 73rd percentile versus all CPUs, while the Intel Core 5 130UL ranks in the 50th percentile. The AMD part also has a recorded average benchmark score of 19364, while the Intel part has no recorded benchmark scores.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS in every measured performance category, but this is entirely because the Intel Core 5 130UL has no benchmark results in the database. The AMD part delivers 17 recorded scores, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 12342 and a Passmark multithread score of 14520. Its 73rd percentile ranking places it alongside established desktop parts like the Intel Core i7-8700K and Core i7-10700F, with deltas of 0.7 percent and -0.7 percent respectively.

For users requiring measured performance data, the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is the only processor with verified results. Its 6-core, 12-thread configuration with a 4.40 GHz boost clock and 16 MB L3 cache provides a complete picture of capability. The 35 W TDP and 6 nm process at TSMC indicate a power-conscious mobile design, consistent with its Mobile market segment classification.

The Intel Core 5 130UL presents a specification-only profile. Its 10 cores, 12 threads, 4.70 GHz boost clock, and 15 W TDP suggest a different design philosophy, but the database contains no measured scores to validate its performance. The 50th percentile ranking is the only performance indicator, and it provides no direct comparison to the AMD part's results.

The selection between these two processors depends entirely on whether measured performance data or specification characteristics take priority. From the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is the only choice with substantiated benchmark results, making it the sole option for data-driven comparisons. The Intel Core 5 130UL offers a lower TDP and higher core count on paper, but without benchmark scores, its practical performance remains unquantified in this database.