AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Core 5 130HL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data does not include a direct head-to-head benchmark comparison between the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS and the Intel Core 5 130HL. The database contains no paired test results for these two processors, so a conventional side-by-side score comparison is not possible from the available measurements.

What can be established is the AMD processor's standalone benchmark profile. The Ryzen 5 7533HS delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12342 and a single-core score of 1742. In Cinebench R20, it records 5183 multi-core and 731 single-core. The older Cinebench R15 test shows 1243 multi-core and 175 single-core. PassMark results include a multi-thread score of 14520, a single-thread score of 2740, integer math at 50800, floating-point math at 27800, and extended instructions at 11219. Data compression reaches 168692, while data encryption sits at 10718. Random string sorting produces 17669, find prime numbers returns 48, and physics scores 821.

The AMD chip holds a 73rd percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 19364. The nearest rival data places it within a tight cluster: the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V averages 19368 with a delta of 0%, the Intel Core i5-1345U averages 19411 with a delta of -0.2%, the Intel Core i7-8700K averages 19238 with a delta of 0.7%, and the Intel Core i7-10700F averages 19499 with a delta of -0.7%. These deltas indicate that the Ryzen 5 7533HS is essentially performance-equivalent to all four rivals, with differences smaller than one percent in either direction. The largest recorded gap is the 0.7% advantage held by the Core i7-8700K, while the Ryzen chip sits 0.7% ahead of the Core i7-10700F.

The Intel Core 5 130HL, by contrast, has no benchmark entries in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, its percentile ranking is 50, and its nearest rival list is empty. This means there is no recorded measurement data to compare against the AMD processor's extensive suite of results.

Where Each One Wins

Without head-to-head results, the win analysis relies on the available benchmark data for the AMD processor and the architectural characteristics of both parts.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS demonstrates clear strengths in multi-threaded workloads based on its recorded scores. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 12342 and PassMark multi-thread score of 14520 indicate substantial parallel processing capability. The data compression score of 168692 is particularly strong, suggesting efficiency in tasks involving data manipulation and archiving. Integer math at 50800 and floating-point math at 27800 further support a profile suited to general computation and scientific workloads. The 73rd percentile ranking places it above the median CPU in the database.

The Intel Core 5 130HL cannot be assigned benchmark wins because no scores exist for it. However, its specifications suggest different usage characteristics. It has 12 cores and 16 threads, compared to the AMD's 6 cores and 12 threads, which in theory could favor heavily parallel workloads. Its boost clock of 4.80 GHz exceeds the AMD's 4.40 GHz, which could benefit single-threaded responsiveness in lightly threaded applications. The Intel part also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering flexibility in system configuration that the AMD chip does not provide, since the AMD processor supports only DDR5.

The AMD chip's integrated Radeon 660M graphics and the Intel chip's Iris Xe Graphics 80EU represent different integrated GPU approaches, though no benchmark data quantifies their relative performance.

Architecture Differences

The two processors belong to different architectural generations and manufacturing processes. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the Rembrandt-R codename, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 5 130HL uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-PS codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry.

Core and thread counts differ significantly. The AMD chip has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel chip has 12 cores and 16 threads. The Intel part's higher core count does not translate into proportionally more threads, indicating a hybrid core arrangement typical of Raptor Lake designs, though the database does not specify performance versus efficiency core distribution.

Clock speeds also differ. The AMD processor has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The Intel processor has a lower base clock of 2.60 GHz but a higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz. Thermal design power differs as well, with the AMD chip rated at 35 watts and the Intel chip at 45 watts. The Intel part is classified as a desktop segment component despite using a mobile-derived architecture, while the AMD chip is classified as mobile.

Cache hierarchies show notable differences. The AMD chip has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part thus has larger per-core L1 and L2 allocations and a larger L3 pool overall.

Memory support diverges. The AMD processor supports DDR5 only, with dual-channel memory and a recorded bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded in the database. Neither chip supports ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity differs substantially. The AMD chip provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The Intel chip provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU. This gives the AMD processor more than double the CPU-attached PCIe lanes, which can matter for expansion options like discrete GPUs and NVMe storage.

Physical specifications also differ. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP7, has a die size of 208 mm², and lists two part numbers: 100-000001632 for FP7 and 100-000001634 for FP7r2. The Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700, has no recorded die size, and its part number is listed as unknown. Both chips have locked multipliers, meaning neither supports unlocked overclocking. Both are marked as active in production.

Release timing differs by several months. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS carries a release date of 2024-08-31. The Intel Core 5 130HL carries a release date of 2024-04-07, making it the earlier release by roughly five months.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear but partial conclusion. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a comprehensive benchmark profile that places it in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average score of 19364. Its nearest rivals all fall within 0.7% of its average score, indicating that it performs on par with a cluster of well-known desktop and mobile processors, including the Intel Core i7-8700K and the Intel Core i7-10700F.

The Intel Core 5 130HL has no recorded benchmark scores, no average score, and an empty rival list. Its 50th percentile ranking is the only comparative metric available, and that figure represents a default position rather than a measured result. From the recorded data alone, the Ryzen 5 7533HS is the only chip of the two with verifiable performance measurements.

For users whose decisions depend on measured benchmark results, the AMD chip is the only option with supporting data. Its 6-core, 12-thread configuration with a 35-watt TDP and 4.40 GHz boost clock delivers recorded multi-core and single-core scores that place it in the upper quarter of the database. The Intel chip's 12 cores, 16 threads, and 4.80 GHz boost clock remain unquantified in terms of actual performance.

The AMD processor's larger PCIe lane count of 20 versus 8, its smaller 6 nm process node versus 10 nm, and its higher memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s give it structural advantages on paper. The Intel chip counters with a larger L3 cache of 18 MB versus 16 MB, larger per-core L2 cache of 2 MB versus 512 KB, and broader memory compatibility spanning DDR4 and DDR5.

The verdict from the data is straightforward: the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has demonstrated performance credentials, while the Intel Core 5 130HL lacks any recorded performance evidence. Any selection between them must account for this asymmetry in available data.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher recorded multi-core benchmark score?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has recorded scores. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 12342, its Cinebench R20 multi-core score is 5183, and its PassMark multi-thread score is 14520. The Intel Core 5 130HL has no benchmark scores in the database.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS compare to its nearest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score is 19364. The Intel Core Ultra 5 226V averages 19368 with a delta of 0%, the Intel Core i5-1345U averages 19411 with a delta of -0.2%, the Intel Core i7-8700K averages 19238 with a delta of 0.7%, and the Intel Core i7-10700F averages 19499 with a delta of -0.7%.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core 5 130HL has 12 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor supports more memory types?

A: The Intel Core 5 130HL supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS supports DDR5 only. Both use dual-channel memory buses, and neither supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the PCIe lane difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The Intel Core 5 130HL provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 5 130HL has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The AMD chip has a higher base clock at 3.30 GHz versus 2.60 GHz for the Intel chip.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS | Intel Core 5 130HL |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 12 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base clock | 3.30 GHz | 2.60 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.40 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Raptor Lake-PS |

| Process node | 6 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | 208 mm² | Not recorded |

| L1 cache | 64 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 cache | 512 KB per core | 2 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 16 MB shared | 18 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC memory | No | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 lanes | Gen 4, 8 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 660M | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Multiplier unlocked | No | No |

| Release date | 2024-08-31 | 2024-04-07 |

| Percentile | 73rd | 50th |

| Average benchmark score | 19364 | 0 |