AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Core 3 100UL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a substantial performance gap between the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS and the Intel Core 3 100UL, though direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons are not available in the database. The AMD processor's benchmark suite provides a comprehensive picture of its capabilities, while the Intel part currently has no recorded benchmark scores. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS sits at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs, whereas the Intel Core 3 100UL ranks at the 50th percentile.

For the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS, the Cinebench results confirm strong multi-core throughput: 1243 points in Cinebench R15 multi-core, 5183 in R20 multi-core, and 12342 in R23 multi-core. Single-core results are similarly consistent, with 175 points in R15, 731 in R20, and 1742 in R23. These figures place the chip in a competitive position relative to its nearest rivals. The Intel Core 3 100UL has no equivalent scores recorded, so direct numeric comparison against the AMD part in these specific workloads is not possible from the database.

PassMark results for the AMD part show particular strengths in integer math at 50800 points, floating point math at 27800, and multithread performance at 14520. Data compression scores reach 168692, while encryption tasks complete at 10718. Extended instruction workloads score 11219, and random string sorting achieves 17669. The single-thread PassMark score is 2740, and prime number finding scores 48. Physics workloads score 821.

The AMD processor's average benchmark score is 19364, which places it just 0.2% behind the Intel Core i5-1345U at 19411 and 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core i7-8700K at 19238. It also trails the Intel Core i7-10700F by 0.7%, which scores 19499, and essentially matches the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V at 19368. These deltas are all within one percent, indicating that the Ryzen 5 7533HS performs in a tightly contested band around the 19300 to 19500 average score range. The Intel Core 3 100UL has no average benchmark score recorded, making any direct comparison of overall performance impossible from the available data.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the Rembrandt-R codename, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 208 mm². The Intel Core 3 100UL employs the Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-PS codename, fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel. Both processors feature six cores, but the AMD part supports 12 threads through simultaneous multithreading, while the Intel part supports only 8 threads. The AMD chip's base clock is 3.30 GHz with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz; the Intel chip has a much lower base clock of 1.20 GHz but a slightly higher boost clock of 4.50 GHz.

Cache layouts differ significantly between the two. The AMD processor provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor offers 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 10 MB of shared L3 cache. Total L3 cache favors AMD by 6 MB. The L2 cache per core favors Intel by a factor of roughly 2.4, though the thread count difference means the AMD part has 12 threads sharing its cache hierarchy versus 8 on the Intel side.

Memory support also differs. The AMD part supports DDR5 memory exclusively with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded. Neither processor supports ECC memory. PCIe connectivity shows a significant gap: the AMD processor provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). That is a 12-lane difference in favor of AMD.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS carries a Radeon 660M, while the Intel Core 3 100UL uses UHD Graphics 64EU. The AMD part is classified as a mobile processor on AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel part is classified as a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700. The Intel part's market segment as desktop hardware is notable given its 15 W TDP, which is far below the AMD part's 35 W TDP. The AMD part carries the part number 100-000001632 (FP7) and 100-000001634 (FP7r2), while the Intel part's part number is unknown.

The AMD processor was released on 2024-08-31, while the Intel processor was released earlier on 2024-04-07. Both are listed as active in production, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD processor belongs to the 7000 series, while the Intel Core 3 100UL has no series designation recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS supports 12 threads across 6 cores, while the Intel Core 3 100UL supports 8 threads across 6 cores. The AMD part provides 4 additional threads.

Q: How do the boost clocks compare?

A: The Intel Core 3 100UL has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, which is 0.10 GHz higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS's boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The AMD part has a much higher base clock at 3.30 GHz versus 1.20 GHz for the Intel part.

Q: What is the difference in TDP between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a TDP of 35 W, while the Intel Core 3 100UL has a TDP of 15 W. The Intel part consumes less power on paper.

Q: Which processor has more PCIe lanes?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel Core 3 100UL provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The AMD part offers 12 additional lanes.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS supports DDR5 only. The Intel Core 3 100UL supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: Do the processors have recorded benchmark scores?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has an extensive set of Cinebench and PassMark scores with an average benchmark score of 19364. The Intel Core 3 100UL currently has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS | Intel Core 3 100UL |

|---|---|---|

| Series | 7000 series | null |

| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |

| Cores | 6 | 6 |

| Threads | 12 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 3.30 GHz | 1.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.40 GHz | 4.50 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Raptor Lake-PS |

| Generation | Ryzen 5 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt)) | Core 3 (Raptor Lake-PS) |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 208 mm² | null |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 10 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | null |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 660M | UHD Graphics 64EU |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2024-08-31 | 2024-04-07 |

| Part Number | 100-000001632 (FP7), 100-000001634 (FP7r2) | unknown |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 73 | 50 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 19364 | 0 |

The Verdict

The data supports a clear distinction between these two processors. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is the only one of the pair with recorded performance measurements, and its 73rd percentile ranking places it well above the Intel Core 3 100UL's 50th percentile. The AMD part delivers 12 threads versus 8, a 16 MB L3 cache versus 10 MB, 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes versus 8, and a substantially higher base clock of 3.30 GHz versus 1.20 GHz. Its memory bandwidth is recorded at 76.8 GB/s, while the Intel part has no bandwidth figure in the database.

The Intel Core 3 100UL counters with a higher boost clock at 4.50 GHz, a lower TDP at 15 W versus 35 W, larger per-core L1 and L2 caches, and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. Its classification as a desktop part on Socket 1700 despite the low TDP makes it an unusual entry, but the lack of benchmark data means its real-world performance cannot be assessed from the database.

For workloads that depend on multi-threaded throughput, cache capacity, and PCIe connectivity, the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is the better choice based on the recorded specifications and its measured performance around the 19364 average benchmark score. For systems constrained by power draw or those needing DDR4 compatibility, the Intel Core 3 100UL offers the lower TDP and broader memory support, though no performance numbers exist to quantify its capability. The AMD part's nearest rivals all score within 0.7% of its average, which indicates it is well positioned among mainstream processors, while the Intel part remains unmeasured.