AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Arc G3 EXTREME Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor ranks higher in the database's overall performance percentile?

A: The Intel Arc G3 EXTREME sits in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS sits in the 73rd percentile. That gap places the Intel part in a higher overall performance tier according to the recorded data.

Q: What is the average benchmark score difference between the two?

A: The Intel Arc G3 EXTREME records an average benchmark score of 36699, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS records 19364, a difference of 17335 points. The Intel part's closest rivals in the database, such as the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, average 37093, which is just 1.1% higher.

Q: Which CPU has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Arc G3 EXTREME has 14 cores and 14 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel part does not use simultaneous multithreading, as the core and thread counts are equal.

Q: Do both processors support error-correcting memory?

A: No. Both the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS and the Intel Arc G3 EXTREME have ECC memory support listed as false in the database.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Arc G3 EXTREME has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The Intel part also has a lower base clock at 1.90 GHz versus 3.30 GHz for the AMD part.

Q: How many head-to-head benchmark comparisons does each processor win?

A: The Intel Arc G3 EXTREME wins all 17 recorded head-to-head benchmark comparisons. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS wins none of the 17 comparisons.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design lineages. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is built on the Zen 3+ architecture with the codename Rembrandt-R, part of the 7000 series. It is manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process node, with a die size of 208 mm². The Intel Arc G3 EXTREME uses a different architectural family entirely, with the codename Panther Lake, and is manufactured by Intel on a 3 nm process node. The database does not list a die size for the Intel part.

Core organization differs sharply. The AMD processor uses 6 cores and 12 threads, indicating simultaneous multithreading is active. The Intel processor uses 14 cores and 14 threads, meaning each core maps to exactly one thread with no multithreading. Cache hierarchies also diverge. The AMD part allocates 64 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, with 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel part allocates 192 KB of L1 per core and 2.5 MB of L2 per core, with 18 MB of shared L3.

Memory interfaces are not the same. The AMD processor supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel processor supports LPDDR5X memory, also dual-channel, but with a recorded memory bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 4 lanes (CPU only).

The integrated graphics solutions are distinct. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS ships with Radeon 660M graphics, while the Intel Arc G3 EXTREME ships with Arc B390 graphics. Both processors target the mobile market segment, and both are listed as active in production. The AMD part fits the AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel part fits the Intel BGA 2540 socket. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data shows a comprehensive sweep for the Intel Arc G3 EXTREME. The largest margin appears in the PassMark find prime numbers test, where Intel scores 248 versus AMD's 48, a delta of 80.6% in Intel's favor. That is more than a fivefold difference in raw score. Floating point math follows with 86929 for Intel versus 27800 for AMD, a 68% delta. Physics testing shows Intel at 2515 versus AMD at 821, a 67.4% delta.

Cinebench results also favor Intel consistently. In Cinebench R20 multicore, Intel scores 10945 against AMD's 5183, a 52.6% delta. The R20 single-core test shows Intel at 1545 versus AMD at 731, a 52.7% delta. Cinebench R15 multicore has Intel at 2192 and AMD at 1243, a 43.3% delta, while the R15 single-core test has Intel at 267 and AMD at 175, a 34.5% delta.

The narrowest margins appear in the newer Cinebench R23 tests. In R23 multicore, Intel scores 14655 versus AMD's 12342, a 15.8% delta. In R23 single-core, Intel scores 1862 versus AMD's 1742, a 6.4% delta. These are still Intel wins, but the gap narrows considerably compared to the older Cinebench versions.

PassMark integer math shows Intel at 71164 versus AMD at 50800, a 28.6% delta. Data compression gives Intel 307094 versus AMD's 168692, a 45.1% delta. Data encryption shows Intel at 23881 versus AMD's 10718, a 55.1% delta. Extended instructions give Intel 24017 versus AMD's 11219, a 53.3% delta. Multithread performance has Intel at 30659 and AMD at 14520, a 52.6% delta. Random string sorting shows Intel at 37331 versus AMD's 17669, a 52.7% delta. Single-thread tests show Intel at 4293 versus AMD's 2740, a 36.2% delta, and this figure appears twice in the recorded data.

Specification Differences

The core counts and thread counts differ as described above: 6 cores and 12 threads for AMD, 14 cores and 14 threads for Intel. Base clocks differ at 3.30 GHz for AMD versus 1.90 GHz for Intel, while boost clocks differ at 4.40 GHz for AMD versus 4.70 GHz for Intel. Thermal design power differs, with AMD at 35 watts and Intel at 25 watts. The process node differs at 6 nm for AMD and 3 nm for Intel, with different foundries: TSMC for AMD and Intel for Intel.

Cache sizes differ across all levels. L1 is 64 KB per core for AMD versus 192 KB per core for Intel. L2 is 512 KB per core for AMD versus 2.5 MB per core for Intel. L3 is 16 MB shared for AMD versus 18 MB shared for Intel. Memory support differs with DDR5 for AMD and LPDDR5X for Intel. Memory bandwidth differs, with 76.8 GB/s for AMD and 136.5 GB/s for Intel. PCIe generation and lane counts differ: Gen 4 with 20 lanes for AMD, Gen 5 with 4 lanes for Intel.

Integrated graphics differ, with Radeon 660M for AMD and Arc B390 for Intel. Sockets differ: AMD Socket FP7 versus Intel BGA 2540. Part numbers are different: 100-000001632(FP7) and 100-000001634(FP7r2) for AMD, SA4R3 for Intel. Release dates differ as well, with AMD listed for 2024-08-31 and Intel for 2026-05-27. The architecture field is populated for AMD as Zen 3+, while the database leaves it null for Intel, though the codename Panther Lake is listed. The die size is listed for AMD at 208 mm² but is null for Intel.

The Verdict

The recorded data indicates a decisive performance advantage for the Intel Arc G3 EXTREME across every benchmark in the head-to-head set. The Intel part wins all 17 comparisons, with the average benchmark score of 36699 nearly double the AMD part's 19364. The percentile ranking reinforces this, placing Intel at 85 versus AMD at 73.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS does hold some positional strengths. It has a higher base clock at 3.30 GHz versus 1.90 GHz, and it uses 12 threads from 6 cores, which can benefit workloads that scale with simultaneous multithreading. The AMD part also has a lower peak power draw at 35 watts versus 25 watts for Intel, though the direction is reversed: Intel uses less power. The AMD part uses a wider PCIe implementation with 20 Gen 4 lanes versus Intel's 4 Gen 5 lanes, which could matter for certain external device configurations.

But the benchmark data does not show any test where the AMD part leads. The closest margin is Cinebench R23 single-core, where Intel leads by only 6.4%, and the widest is PassMark find prime numbers, where Intel leads by 80.6%. For any workload represented in the database, the Intel Arc G3 EXTREME delivers the higher score.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc G3 EXTREME wins in every measured category, so the use-case split follows the degree of advantage rather than the direction. The largest wins appear in integer-heavy and mathematical workloads. PassMark find prime numbers, floating point math, and physics show deltas from 67.4% to 80.6%, suggesting a strong advantage for scientific computing, simulation, and number-crunching tasks. Data encryption and extended instructions also show large deltas above 53%, pointing toward security workloads and specialized instruction sets.

The Intel part also dominates data compression with a 45.1% delta and random string sorting with a 52.7% delta, indicating strength in data management and sorting tasks. Multithread performance shows a 52.6% delta, making the Intel part the clear choice for parallel workloads in the database. Single-thread performance shows a 36.2% delta, and the Cinebench R23 single-core delta narrows to 6.4%, so the AMD part remains closer in lightly threaded scenarios but still trails.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS does not win any recorded benchmark, but its profile suggests it operates in a lower performance envelope. It has a higher base clock and uses fewer cores with more threads per core, which could suit workloads that favor high per-core frequency at low thread counts. Its 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes provide more connectivity options than Intel's 4 Gen 5 lanes. The AMD part also uses a larger process node at 6 nm versus 3 nm, and the database records a die size of 208 mm² for AMD while leaving Intel's die size unlisted.

For users selecting based purely on the recorded benchmark scores, the Intel Arc G3 EXTREME is the higher-performing part in every test. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS may fit systems where the socket, PCIe lane count, or higher base clock are deciding factors, but the performance data consistently favors Intel.