AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX wins every recorded head-to-head test, and by a staggering margin. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Threadripper scores 8182 against 1243 for the Ryzen 5 7533HS, representing a 558.2% advantage. The single-core R15 test shows a slightly larger gap, with the 5995WX at 1155 versus 175, a 560% difference. These are not incremental gains; they are order-of-magnitude separations in raw throughput.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the pattern holds. The multicore result is 34093 for the Threadripper versus 5183 for the Ryzen 5, a 557.8% lead. In single-core, the scores are 4813 and 731, respectively, for a 558.4% delta. The R23 tests, which are more modern and more demanding, reinforce the same conclusion: the 5995WX posts 81175 in multicore against 12342, a 557.7% edge, and 11460 in single-core against 1742, a 557.9% advantage.

The wins are total: the Threadripper PRO 5995WX claims 6 victories in the head-to-head suite, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS has zero. The magnitude of these deltas, all clustered around 558%, indicates that the performance difference is consistent across different benchmark generations and workloads. The data shows a processor designed for maximum parallel throughput against a mobile chip optimized for efficiency, and the benchmark results reflect that fundamental design split.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two parts is vast, beginning with the core counts. The Threadripper PRO 5995WX packs 64 cores and 128 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads. This 10.67x difference in core count is the primary driver of the multicore benchmark results. The base clock of the 7533HS is higher at 3.30 GHz versus 2.70 GHz, and the boost clocks are close (4.40 GHz versus 4.50 GHz), but core count overrides clock speed in heavily threaded workloads.

The process nodes differ: the Threadripper is built on TSMC's 7 nm process, while the Ryzen 5 uses a 6 nm process. The newer node should theoretically allow better power efficiency, but the Threadripper's transistor count is massive at 33,200 million, spread across 8 dies at 81 mm² each. The Ryzen 5 uses a single 208 mm² die. The Threadripper's L3 cache totals 256 MB, while the Ryzen 5 has only 16 MB shared. L1 and L2 caches are identical per core at 64 KB and 512 KB respectively, but the sheer size of the Threadripper's L3 is a differentiator for data-heavy workloads.

Memory support diverges sharply. The Threadripper uses DDR4 with an eight-channel memory bus, delivering 204.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The Ryzen 5 uses DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, capped at 76.8 GB/s. The Threadripper also supports ECC memory, while the Ryzen 5 does not. PCIe lanes differ as well: the Threadripper offers 128 Gen 4 lanes, compared to 20 for the Ryzen 5. The Ryzen 5 includes integrated Radeon 660M graphics; the Threadripper has no integrated GPU.

The Threadripper sits in the AMD Socket WRX8, a server/workstation platform, while the Ryzen 5 uses AMD Socket FP7, a mobile platform. The TDPs reflect this: 280 watts for the Threadripper versus 35 watts for the Ryzen 5. The release dates also differ, with the Threadripper launching in March 2022 and the Ryzen 5 in August 2024. Both are based on Zen 3 derivatives, but the Threadripper is Zen 3 (Chagall PRO) while the Ryzen 5 is Zen 3+ (Rembrandt-R).

Where Each One Wins

The Threadripper PRO 5995WX wins all recorded benchmark categories, but the nature of those wins points to specific use cases. The multicore Cinebench results, with deltas around 558%, highlight its dominance in rendering, video encoding, scientific computing, and any workload that can saturate 64 cores and 128 threads. The massive 256 MB L3 cache and eight-channel memory bandwidth make it suitable for in-memory databases and large-scale data processing. The 128 PCIe Gen 4 lanes allow for extensive GPU or NVMe expansion, critical for workstation-class systems.

The Ryzen 5 7533HS, despite losing every head-to-head test, has its own strengths based on the broader benchmark data. It has a higher base clock, which can help in lightly threaded tasks where boost clocks are sustained. The integrated Radeon 660M graphics mean it can handle display output without a discrete GPU, a feature absent on the Threadripper. The 35 watt TDP makes it suitable for laptops and compact systems where power draw is a constraint. In the Passmark suite, the 7533HS shows decent single-thread performance at 2740 and a multithread score of 14520, but these numbers are not comparable to the Threadripper's Cinebench results directly.

The data suggests the Threadripper is for heavy parallel computation, while the Ryzen 5 is for mobile productivity and light workloads. The Ryzen 5's DDR5 support and newer process node give it a modern feature set, but the Threadripper's raw core count and memory bandwidth win every measured test.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX has 64 cores and 128 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the largest benchmark win for the Threadripper?

A: The largest single delta is in Cinebench R15 single-core, where the Threadripper leads by 560% (1155 versus 175). The multicore R15 win is 558.2%.

Q: Does the Ryzen 5 7533HS win any head-to-head benchmark?

A: No. The recorded data shows the Threadripper PRO 5995WX wins all 6 head-to-head tests, and the Ryzen 5 has zero wins.

Q: What memory types do they support?

A: The Threadripper supports DDR4 with an eight-channel memory bus, while the Ryzen 5 supports DDR5 with a dual-channel bus.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS, which includes Radeon 660M graphics. The Threadripper PRO 5995WX has no integrated graphics.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The Threadripper PRO 5995WX has a TDP of 280 watts, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS has a TDP of 35 watts.

The Verdict

The data is decisive: the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is the superior processor in every recorded benchmark, with leads of roughly 558% across all Cinebench tests. For any workload that scales with core count or memory bandwidth, such as rendering, simulation, or data analysis, the Threadripper is the clear choice. Its 256 MB L3 cache, eight-channel DDR4 memory, and 128 PCIe lanes make it a workstation-class part.

The Ryzen 5 7533HS, however, is a mobile chip with a 35 watt TDP and integrated graphics. It is not meant to compete with 64-core parts; it is meant for laptops and small-form-factor systems. The data shows it loses every head-to-head test, but it offers features the Threadripper lacks: a newer 6 nm process, DDR5 support, and a higher base clock. For users needing portability and low power draw, the 7533HS is the only option of the two.

The Threadripper PRO 5995WX carries a launch MSRP of $6499, which reflects its workstation positioning. The Ryzen 5 has no recorded launch MSRP, but its mobile segment implies a much lower price point. The choice depends on the use case: maximum throughput versus mobile efficiency.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Series | 5000 series | 7000 series |

| Cores | 64 | 6 |

| Threads | 128 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 2.70 GHz | 3.30 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 4.40 GHz |

| TDP | 280 W | 35 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 | AMD Socket FP7 |

| Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 3+ |

| Codename | Chagall PRO | Rembrandt-R |

| Process Node | 7 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 33,200 million | Not specified |

| Die Size | 8x 81 mm² | 208 mm² |

| L3 Cache | 256 MB | 16 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Eight-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 128 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | None | Radeon 660M |

| Market Segment | Server/Workstation | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2022-03-07 | 2024-08-31 |

| Launch MSRP | $6499 | Not specified |

| Part Number | 100-000000444 | 100-000001632(FP7)100-000001634(FP7r2) |