AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE Comparison

AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE are both six-core, twelve-thread processors, but the benchmark data shows a decisive performance gap. Across every recorded test, the 8500GE posts a higher score. The 7533HS does not win a single head-to-head comparison in the database, while the 8500GE wins all 17 recorded runs. The average benchmark score for the 7533HS is 19,364, placing it in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs. The 8500GE averages 28,054, which puts it in the 80th percentile. This difference in percentile ranking reflects a processor that is not just faster in isolated tests, but consistently faster across a wide range of workloads.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most significant advantage for the 8500GE appears in multi-threaded rendering tasks. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the 8500GE scores 18,395 against the 7533HS's 12,342, a delta of -32.9% for the older chip. This pattern repeats in Cinebench R20 multi-core (7,725 vs 5,183, -32.9%) and Cinebench R15 multi-core (1,854 vs 1,243, -33%). The single-core Cinebench results show a similar gap: R23 single-core is 2,597 for the 8500GE versus 1,742 for the 7533HS, again a -32.9% delta. The R20 single-core test shows 1,090 versus 731 (-32.9%), and R15 single-core shows 261 versus 175 (-33%). These consistent deltas across both multi-core and single-core tests indicate the 8500GE's architectural advantage is not workload-specific, but rather a fundamental throughput advantage per clock.

The largest percentage gap in the entire dataset appears in PassMark's random string sorting test. The 8500GE scores 31,240, while the 7533HS scores 17,669, a delta of -43.4%. This test is sensitive to memory latency and cache hierarchy, and the 8500GE's larger per-core L2 cache likely contributes to this result. The smallest gap is in PassMark integer math, where the 8500GE scores 63,045 and the 7533HS scores 50,800, a delta of -19.4%. This still represents a substantial lead, but it is the closest result in the comparison. Floating point math shows a -29.1% delta (39,233 vs 27,800), while data compression shows a -32.2% delta (248,675 vs 168,692). Data encryption follows with a -24.3% delta (14,163 vs 10,718), and extended instructions show a -37.7% delta (17,999 vs 11,219). PassMark physics shows a -33.6% delta (1,237 vs 821), and the find prime numbers test shows a -42.2% delta (83 vs 48). PassMark multi-thread shows a -32.5% delta (21,502 vs 14,520), and the single-thread tests show a -29.9% delta (3,909 vs 2,740). Every single test confirms the same direction: the 8500GE is faster, often by a third or more.

The Verdict

The recorded data leaves no ambiguity. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE is the superior processor in every measurable way. It wins all 17 benchmark comparisons, and its average score of 28,054 is roughly 45% higher than the 7533HS's 19,364. The 8500GE also sits in a higher performance percentile (80th vs 73rd). For any workload that relies on CPU throughput, whether single-threaded or multi-threaded, the 8500GE delivers a clear advantage. The 7533HS is a capable processor, but it is consistently behind in every category recorded in the database. The 8500GE's nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i5-14500T (avg score 28,065, delta 0%) and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G (avg score 28,032, delta 0.1%). The 7533HS's nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (avg score 19,368, delta 0%) and the Intel Core i7-8700K (avg score 19,238, delta 0.7%). These rival comparisons further contextualize the gap: the 8500GE is competing in a higher performance tier entirely.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE wins in all benchmark categories, so there is no recorded test where the 7533HS comes out ahead. The 8500GE's largest advantages are in random string sorting (-43.4%), find prime numbers (-42.2%), and extended instructions (-37.7%). These tests are typically memory-latency sensitive and benefit from higher IPC and faster cache. The 8500GE's smallest advantage is in integer math (-19.4%), which still represents a significant lead. The 7533HS does maintain a lower power envelope in terms of process node: it uses a 6 nm process, while the 8500GE uses a 4 nm process. However, both are rated at 35W TDP, so the power draw is identical in the datasheet. The 7533HS also supports more PCIe lanes (20 vs 14), which could be relevant for certain expansion configurations, but this does not translate into any performance win in the recorded benchmarks. The 8500GE supports ECC memory, while the 7533HS does not, which is a feature differentiator for reliability-focused systems.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a boost clock of 4.40 GHz.

Q: What is the difference in Cinebench R23 multi-core scores?

A: The 8500GE scores 18,395, and the 7533HS scores 12,342. The 8500GE is ahead by 6,053 points, which corresponds to a -32.9% delta for the 7533HS.

Q: Do both processors have the same number of cores and threads?

A: Yes, both have 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Which processor has a smaller manufacturing process node?

A: The 8500GE uses a 4 nm process, while the 7533HS uses a 6 nm process. Both are manufactured by TSMC.

Q: Is there any benchmark where the 7533HS wins?

A: No. The database records 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, and the 8500GE wins all of them.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The 7533HS has an average benchmark score of 19,364, and the 8500GE has an average benchmark score of 28,054.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations. The 7533HS is based on Zen 3+ with the codename Rembrandt-R, part of the 7000 series. The 8500GE is based on Zen 4 with the codename Phoenix2, part of the 8000 series. The 8500GE uses a 4 nm process node and has 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. The 7533HS uses a 6 nm process node and has a die size of 208 mm². The 8500GE has a larger L2 cache per core at 1 MB, while the 7533HS has 512 KB per core. Both have 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The 8500GE supports ECC memory, while the 7533HS does not. The integrated graphics differ: the 7533HS uses the Radeon 660M, and the 8500GE uses the Radeon 740M. The 8500GE runs on AMD Socket AM5, while the 7533HS uses AMD Socket FP7. The 8500GE has a higher boost clock at 5.00 GHz versus 4.40 GHz, and a slightly higher base clock at 3.40 GHz versus 3.30 GHz.

Specification Differences

The only specification fields where the two differ are the socket, architecture, codename, generation, process node, die size, transistor count, L2 cache size, ECC memory support, PCIe lane count, base clock, boost clock, integrated graphics, memory bandwidth, release date, and part number. The 8500GE has a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, while the 7533HS has 76.8 GB/s. The 8500GE has 14 PCIe lanes (CPU only), while the 7533HS has 20. The 8500GE was released earlier, on 2024-04-15, while the 7533HS was released later, on 2024-08-31. The 8500GE has a transistor count of 20,900 million, while the 7533HS does not have a recorded transistor count in the database. The die sizes are 137 mm² for the 8500GE and 208 mm² for the 7533HS. The part numbers are also distinct: the 8500GE is 100-000001185, while the 7533HS is 100-000001632(FP7) and 100-000001634(FP7r2). Both processors have a TDP of 35W, support DDR5 memory, use dual-channel memory buses, and are not multiplier-unlocked. Both are Active in production status and target the Mobile market segment.