AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D vs AMD Ryzen Embedded 8840U Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D

CORE STATE Raphael
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 4 Base / 4.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 96 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Raphael
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
AMD
AMD

Ryzen Embedded 8840U

CORE STATE Hawk Point
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.3 Base / 5.1 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
271,649
N/A
passmark_data_encryption
15,797
N/A
passmark_extended_instructions
20,455
N/A
passmark_find_prime_numbers
221
N/A
passmark_floating_point_math
43,594
N/A
passmark_integer_math
70,774
N/A
passmark_multithread
25,047
N/A
passmark_physics
2,779
N/A
passmark_random_string_sorting
32,999
N/A
passmark_single_thread
3,494
N/A
passmark_singlethread
3,494
N/A

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D vs AMD Ryzen Embedded 8840U

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8840U occupy different corners of the processor market, and the recorded data reflects that split clearly. The 7500X3D is a desktop part built around the Raphael design, while the 8840U is a mobile embedded processor using the Hawk Point architecture. Because the embedded chip has no benchmark entries in the database, the comparison relies entirely on the desktop processor's measured results and the structural specifications of both units.

For the Ryzen 5 7500X3D, the database includes eleven PassMark test scores. The multithread score sits at 25047, while the single-thread score is 3494. The floating-point math test returns 43594, and integer math reaches 70774. Data compression scores 271649, data encryption comes in at 15797, and extended instructions hit 20455. The find prime numbers test produces 221, physics processing lands at 2779, and random string sorting finishes at 32999. The average benchmark score across all tests is 44573, placing the processor in the 89th percentile of all CPUs in the database.

The Ryzen Embedded 8840U has no recorded benchmark scores. Its percentile stands at 50, and its average benchmark score is zero, meaning there is no direct numerical comparison available for most workload categories. The only head-to-head data points come from the specifications, which show the 8840U with 8 cores and 16 threads versus 6 cores and 12 threads for the 7500X3D. The embedded part boosts higher at 5.10 GHz compared to 4.50 GHz, but the desktop chip has a higher base clock at 4.00 GHz versus 3.30 GHz.

The nearest rivals for the 7500X3D provide context for its average score. The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H scores 44466, a delta of 0.2 percent. The Intel Core i9-13950HX scores 44342, a 0.5 percent gap. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44309, 0.6 percent behind. The Intel Core i5-14600 scores 44889, which is 0.7 percent ahead of the 7500X3D. These deltas are tight, indicating the desktop processor sits in a crowded performance band, but its 89th percentile ranking shows it outpaces the vast majority of recorded CPUs.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 5 7500X3D wins outright in every measured benchmark category simply because the 8840U has no scores in the database. Within the 7500X3D's own results, the data shows particular strengths in specific workload types. The data compression score of 271649 is by far the highest absolute number among its tests, suggesting the processor handles compression workloads with particular efficiency. Integer math at 70774 and floating-point math at 43594 both indicate strong arithmetic throughput for a 6-core part. The extended instructions score of 20455 points to solid SIMD and vector processing capability.

The 8840U's advantages are structural rather than measured. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, giving it a 2-core and 4-thread advantage over the 7500X3D's 6 cores and 12 threads. Its boost clock of 5.10 GHz exceeds the 7500X3D's 4.50 GHz by 0.60 GHz. The embedded processor uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC, while the desktop chip uses a 5 nm node. The 8840U integrates the Radeon 780M graphics, which is a more capable integrated GPU than the standard Radeon Graphics found in the 7500X3D. The embedded part also has a higher memory bandwidth rating at 89.6 GB/s versus 83.2 GB/s.

The 7500X3D counters with a massive L3 cache advantage. It carries 96 MB of shared L3 cache, while the 8840U has only 16 MB. That 80 MB difference is the single largest specification gap between the two processors. The desktop chip also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, whereas the embedded part uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. Both support DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and both include ECC memory support.

For power efficiency, the 8840U has a clear edge on paper. Its TDP is 28 watts, compared to 65 watts for the 7500X3D. That lower thermal envelope makes the embedded processor suitable for fanless or passively cooled designs, while the desktop chip requires more substantial cooling. The 8840U also has a smaller physical footprint in terms of socket type, using AMD Socket FP8 rather than the larger AM5 socket.

The Verdict

The data supports a straightforward choice based on workload and platform. For desktop users who need maximum L3 cache and have access to AM5 motherboards, the Ryzen 5 7500X3D is the only option with measured performance in the database. Its 96 MB of L3 cache is a defining feature, and its 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms it outperforms the vast majority of recorded processors. The 7500X3D also delivers a higher base clock, PCIe Gen 5 support, and a 65 watt TDP that is manageable for a desktop build.

For embedded or mobile applications where power consumption is critical, the Ryzen Embedded 8840U is the logical pick. Its 28 watt TDP is less than half the desktop chip's rating, and its 8-core, 16-thread configuration provides more parallel processing headroom on paper. The 8840U also offers a higher boost clock and a newer 4 nm process node, which typically improves efficiency per watt. Its Radeon 780M integrated graphics are more capable than the 7500X3D's Radeon Graphics, making it better suited for systems that rely on the iGPU for display output or light graphical tasks.

The decision hinges on whether the user prioritizes measured desktop performance or low-power embedded capability. The 7500X3D has no benchmark data for the 8840U to challenge, so any performance comparison is one-sided. The 8840U wins on core count, boost clock, process node, memory bandwidth, and power draw, but the 7500X3D wins on cache size, PCIe generation, base clock, and every recorded test score. Neither processor is unlocked for overclocking, and both are currently in active production.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8840U has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the L3 cache difference between the two?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500X3D has 96 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Ryzen Embedded 8840U has 16 MB of shared L3 cache, a difference of 80 MB.

Q: How do their power requirements compare?

A: The Ryzen Embedded 8840U has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Ryzen 5 7500X3D has a TDP of 65 watts.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Ryzen Embedded 8840U boosts to 5.10 GHz, which is higher than the Ryzen 5 7500X3D's 4.50 GHz boost clock.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Ryzen 5 7500X3D and the Ryzen Embedded 8840U support ECC memory.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Ryzen 5 7500X3D?

A: The average benchmark score for the Ryzen 5 7500X3D is 44573, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Ryzen Embedded 8840U has no recorded benchmark scores.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturing nodes and design families. The Ryzen 5 7500X3D uses a 5 nm process node from TSMC and is built on the Raphael codename, which is part of the Zen 4 architecture generation. Its die size is 71 mm² with 11,270 million transistors. The Ryzen Embedded 8840U uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC and is based on the Hawk Point codename, also using Zen 4 architecture. Its die is significantly larger at 178 mm² and contains 25,000 million transistors.

Cache hierarchies differ substantially. The 7500X3D allocates 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, matching the 8840U's per-core L1 and L2 allocations. The L3 cache is where they diverge: the desktop part has 96 MB shared, while the embedded part has 16 MB shared. That difference likely stems from the 3D V-Cache technology implied by the X3D designation, although the database does not list a separate vCache3d field for either processor.

Memory support is similar but not identical. Both support DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, and both support ECC memory. The 8840U has a slightly higher memory bandwidth rating at 89.6 GB/s, compared to 83.2 GB/s for the 7500X3D. PCIe support also differs: the 7500X3D offers Gen 5 with 24 lanes, while the 8840U offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

Integrated graphics distinguish the two parts. The 7500X3D includes Radeon Graphics, while the 8840U includes the Radeon 780M, a more advanced iGPU solution. The embedded processor is marked for the Mobile market segment and uses AMD Socket FP8, while the desktop processor targets the Desktop segment with AMD Socket AM5. Both have locked multipliers, so neither supports overclocking.

Production status shows both as active. The 7500X3D was released on 2025-11-11 with a launch MSRP of $269, while the 8840U was released on 2024-04-01 with no launch MSRP recorded. The desktop part's part number is 100-000001904, while the embedded part's part number is listed as unknown. The 7500X3D belongs to the 7000 series and the Ryzen 5 generation, while the 8840U belongs to the 8000 series and the Ryzen Embedded generation.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
5 7500X3D
Embedded 8840U
Core Specs
Cores
6
8 +33.3%
Threads
12
16 +33.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
4
3.3 -17.5%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.5
5.1 +13.3%
Frequency (GHz)
4
3.3 -17.5%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.5
5.1 +13.3%
Multiplier
40
33 -17.5%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
96 MB (shared)
16 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
65
28 -56.9%
PPT
88 W
—
Configurable TDP
—
15-30 W
Architecture
Architecture
—
Zen 4
Codename
Raphael
Hawk Point
Generation
Ryzen 5 (Zen 4 (Raphael))
Ryzen Embedded (Zen 4 (Hawk Point))
Process Size
5 nm
4 nm
Transistors
11,270 million
25,000 million
Die Size
71 mm²
178 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
83.2 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM5
AMD Socket FP8
Chipsets
X870E, X870, B850, B840, X670E, X670, B650E, B650, A620
—
PCIe
Gen 5, 24 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
—
AI/NPU
NPU
—
Yes / 16 TOPS
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon Graphics
Radeon 780M
Other
Market
Desktop
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$269
—
Part Number
100-000001904
unknown
Package
FC-LGA1718
FP8, FP7, FP7r2
Tj Max
89°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
None
—
View Ryzen 5 7500X3D Details View Ryzen Embedded 8840U Details