AMD Ryzen Embedded 8840U vs Intel Core i5-14501TE Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the core and thread counts differ between the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8840U and the Intel Core i5-14501TE?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8840U has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads. The AMD part offers two more physical cores and four additional threads.

Q: What are the base clock speeds of these two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8840U runs at a base clock of 3.30 GHz, whereas the Intel Core i5-14501TE has a lower base clock of 2.20 GHz. Both processors share the same boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports PCIe Gen 5, and which supports PCIe Gen 4?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8840U supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). This gives Intel a newer PCIe generation, but AMD provides more CPU-attached lanes.

Q: What memory types are supported by each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8840U supports DDR5 memory only, in a dual-channel configuration. The Intel Core i5-14501TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also in a dual-channel configuration, offering broader memory compatibility.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8840U has 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Intel leads in total L3 capacity by 8 MB.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8840U has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has a TDP of 45 watts. AMD's processor is rated for considerably lower power consumption.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8840U is built on the Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename, part of the 8000 series. It uses a 4 nm process node manufactured by TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14501TE is based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R codename from the Core 14th Gen series, and uses a 10 nm process node from Intel's own foundry. The process node difference is substantial: AMD's 4 nm TSMC process versus Intel's 10 nm node indicates a significant manufacturing advantage for AMD in terms of transistor density and potential power efficiency.

The AMD chip integrates 25,000 million transistors on a die size of 178 mm². The Intel part does not have a recorded transistor count in the database, but its die size is larger at 215 mm². Despite the larger die, Intel's processor has fewer cores (6 versus 8), which suggests the Raptor Lake design uses more area per core or includes additional uncore logic.

Cache structures differ notably. AMD allocates 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, resulting in 8 MB of total L2 across all cores. Intel allocates 80 KB of L1 per core and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, totaling 7.5 MB of L2 across its 6 cores. For L3, Intel provides 24 MB shared, which is 8 MB more than AMD's 16 MB shared L3. This means Intel has a larger pool of shared cache, while AMD has slightly more per-core L2 relative to its core count.

The memory controllers also differ. AMD supports only DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel, but the database does not record a specific memory bandwidth figure for Intel. Both processors support ECC memory, which is relevant for embedded and workstation use cases.

PCIe connectivity presents a clear split. AMD offers PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while Intel offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Intel's Gen 5 interface doubles the per-lane bandwidth compared to Gen 4, though AMD provides four additional lanes. The integrated graphics also differ: AMD uses the Radeon 780M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 770.

Market positioning differs as well. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8840U is classified as a Mobile segment part, using the AMD Socket FP8. The Intel Core i5-14501TE is classified as a Desktop segment part, using Intel Socket 1700. Release dates show AMD launched on 2024-04-01, while Intel launched on 2024-06-30.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8840U versus the Intel Core i5-14501TE. Both processors have empty benchmark arrays, and the winsA and winsB fields are both set to 0. This means there are no measured performance scores to compare directly.

However, the specification data allows for analytical comparison. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8840U has a 50 percent boost clock advantage at the top end, but both chips reach 5.10 GHz. The AMD chip starts at 3.30 GHz base, which is 1.10 GHz higher than Intel's 2.20 GHz base clock. This higher base clock is likely to translate into better sustained performance in workloads that do not fully utilize boost behavior.

Core count favors AMD by two cores and four threads. In multi-threaded workloads, an 8-core, 16-thread processor typically outperforms a 6-core, 12-thread processor, assuming similar IPC. Zen 4 architecture is newer than Raptor Lake, which may provide an IPC advantage, though the database does not quantify this directly.

The Intel part counters with a larger L3 cache (24 MB versus 16 MB), which can benefit workloads with large working sets that fit within cache. Intel also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving platform flexibility that AMD lacks, since AMD only supports DDR5. The PCIe Gen 5 support on Intel allows for newer, higher-bandwidth devices, while AMD's Gen 4 with 20 lanes may support more devices simultaneously.

The integrated graphics differ significantly. AMD's Radeon 780M is typically more capable than Intel's UHD Graphics 770 for graphics workloads, though the database does not provide specific benchmark scores to confirm this. The TDP difference of 28 watts versus 45 watts suggests AMD may sustain its boost clocks for longer in thermally constrained environments.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification category. Core count: AMD has 8 cores, Intel has 6. Thread count: AMD has 16, Intel has 12. Base clock: AMD at 3.30 GHz versus Intel at 2.20 GHz. Boost clock is identical at 5.10 GHz for both.

TDP differs substantially: AMD at 28 watts, Intel at 45 watts. Socket types are entirely different: AMD Socket FP8 versus Intel Socket 1700. Architecture: Zen 4 versus Raptor Lake. Process node: 4 nm TSMC versus 10 nm Intel. Die size: 178 mm² versus 215 mm². Transistor count: 25,000 million for AMD, no recorded value for Intel.

Cache layout differs per level. L1: 64 KB per core for AMD versus 80 KB per core for Intel. L2: 1 MB per core for AMD versus 1.25 MB per core for Intel. L3: 16 MB shared for AMD versus 24 MB shared for Intel. Memory support: DDR5 only for AMD versus DDR4 and DDR5 for Intel. Memory bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s recorded for AMD, no value recorded for Intel. PCIe: Gen 4 with 20 lanes for AMD versus Gen 5 with 16 lanes for Intel. Integrated graphics: Radeon 780M versus UHD Graphics 770. Market segment: Mobile versus Desktop. Release date: 2024-04-01 versus 2024-06-30. Part number: unknown for AMD, Q49KSRNJN for Intel.

Both processors support ECC memory, have dual-channel memory buses, are not multiplier-unlocked, and are marked as Active production status. Both have a percentileVsAllCpus of 50 in the database, indicating they sit at the midpoint of all recorded CPUs, though this is a general percentile rather than a head-to-head score.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8840U wins in scenarios that favor core count and power efficiency. With 8 cores and 16 threads, it is better suited for parallel workloads such as compilation, rendering, or virtualization where additional threads provide scaling. The 28-watt TDP makes it more viable for thermally constrained or battery-powered systems, and the higher 3.30 GHz base clock suggests stronger performance in lightly threaded tasks that do not reach boost. The Radeon 780M integrated graphics likely provide more capable graphics output than Intel's UHD Graphics 770, which could matter for embedded systems with display requirements. AMD's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is a recorded figure that supports memory-intensive operations.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE wins in scenarios that benefit from larger cache and newer PCIe connectivity. The 24 MB L3 cache is 50 percent larger than AMD's 16 MB, which can improve hit rates in workloads with moderate data sets. PCIe Gen 5 support enables connection to the latest storage and accelerator devices, even though it offers fewer lanes than AMD. Intel's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives platform flexibility, allowing system designers to reuse existing DDR4 memory or adopt newer DDR5 modules. The Desktop market segment classification suggests Intel targets traditional socketed systems, while AMD's Mobile segment targets compact or embedded form factors.

The identical 5.10 GHz boost clock means peak single-core performance is theoretically similar, though the architecture differences could shift actual results. Intel's larger L1 cache per core (80 KB versus 64 KB) may benefit certain latency-sensitive workloads. AMD's smaller die size and lower TDP indicate better power density characteristics, which is advantageous in dense or fanless designs.

The Verdict

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8840U is the choice for workloads that demand more cores, higher base clock performance, and lower power consumption. Its 8-core, 16-thread configuration provides a clear multi-threading advantage over Intel's 6-core, 12-thread design. The 28-watt TDP, combined with the 4 nm TSMC process, points to superior energy efficiency. The Radeon 780M integrated graphics and recorded 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth support multimedia and data-heavy applications. The Mobile market segment classification indicates suitability for embedded, portable, or compact systems.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE is the choice for platforms that require PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, larger shared cache, or memory flexibility. Its 24 MB L3 cache and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory broaden the range of compatible systems. The Desktop segment classification and Intel Socket 1700 compatibility make it suitable for conventional desktop motherboards. The higher 45-watt TDP suggests it may sustain performance in systems with adequate cooling.

The data shows no direct benchmark scores, so the verdict rests on specification analysis. AMD leads in core count, base clock, process node, power efficiency, and integrated graphics capability. Intel leads in cache capacity, PCIe generation, and memory type flexibility. For multi-threaded embedded workloads with power constraints, AMD is the stronger candidate. For systems needing the latest PCIe devices or memory compatibility options, Intel holds the advantage. Both processors sit at the 50th percentile in the overall database ranking, indicating comparable general performance positioning.