AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT vs AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the two processors compare in overall benchmark average?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT records an average benchmark score of 20733, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS records 19364. The 5600GT sits at the 74th percentile of all CPUs, and the 7533HS sits at the 73rd percentile.

Q: Which processor wins more head-to-head benchmark comparisons?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT wins all 17 recorded head-to-head benchmark comparisons. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS does not win a single test in the database.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two in any single test?

A: The largest gap appears in the PassMark extended instructions test, where the 5600GT scores 18041 against 11219 for the 7533HS, a difference of 60.8%.

Q: Are both processors built on the same manufacturing process?

A: No. The 5600GT uses a 7 nm process, while the 7533HS uses a 6 nm process. Both are fabricated by TSMC.

Q: Do these processors support the same memory type?

A: No. The 5600GT supports DDR4 memory with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, while the 7533HS supports DDR5 memory with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT boosts to 4.60 GHz, whereas the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS boosts to 4.40 GHz. The 5600GT also has a higher base clock at 3.60 GHz versus 3.30 GHz.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT belongs to the 5000 series and uses the Zen 3 architecture under the codename Cezanne. It is built on a 7 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 180 mm² and contains 10,700 million transistors. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS belongs to the 7000 series and uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the codename Rembrandt-R. It is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 208 mm², and its transistor count is not recorded in the database.

Both processors have 6 cores and 12 threads. The 5600GT has a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, while the 7533HS has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The 5600GT carries a TDP of 65 W and targets the desktop segment with an AMD Socket AM4. The 7533HS carries a 35 W TDP and targets the mobile segment with an AMD Socket FP7.

Cache configurations are similar in capacity but differ in description. Both have 64 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core. The 5600GT lists 16 MB of L3, while the 7533HS lists 16 MB of shared L3.

Memory support diverges clearly. The 5600GT uses DDR4 with a dual-channel bus and 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The 7533HS uses DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth. Neither supports ECC memory.

PCIe capabilities differ as well. The 5600GT provides Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The 7533HS provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

The integrated graphics differ. The 5600GT uses Radeon Vega 7, while the 7533HS uses Radeon 660M. The 5600GT has an unlocked multiplier, while the 7533HS does not. The 5600GT was released on 2024-01-07, and the 7533HS was released on 2024-08-31. The 5600GT has a launch MSRP of $140; no launch MSRP is recorded for the 7533HS.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a clean sweep for the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT across every benchmark in the head-to-head set. The margins vary widely by workload, from a modest 6.6% to a substantial 60.8%.

In Cinebench tests, the 5600GT leads by roughly 40% across the board. Cinebench R15 multicore shows 1740 against 1243, a 40% gap. Cinebench R15 singlecore shows 245 against 175, also 40%. Cinebench R20 multicore shows 7254 against 5183, a 40% gap. Cinebench R20 singlecore shows 1023 against 731, a 39.9% gap. Cinebench R23 multicore shows 17272 against 12342, a 39.9% gap. Cinebench R23 singlecore shows 2438 against 1742, a 40% gap.

PassMark tests reveal where the 5600GT stretches its advantage furthest. The extended instructions test shows 18041 against 11219, a 60.8% lead. Data compression shows 258882 against 168692, a 53.5% lead. Random string sorting shows 26188 against 17669, a 48.2% lead. Data encryption shows 15873 against 10718, a 48.1% lead. Floating point math shows 39817 against 27800, a 43.2% lead. Multithread shows 20325 against 14520, a 40% lead. Integer math shows 69566 against 50800, a 36.9% lead. Single thread shows 3348 against 2740, a 22.2% lead.

The smallest advantage comes from the PassMark physics test, where the 5600GT scores 875 against 821, a 6.6% gap. The PassMark find prime numbers test shows 57 against 48, an 18.8% gap.

The 3DMark scores are recorded only for the 5600GT in the database, with 5523 in 16 threads, 1794 in 2 threads, 3446 in 4 threads, 4968 in 8 threads, 5554 in max threads, and 913 in single thread. Comparable 3DMark data for the 7533HS is not available in the recorded measurements.

When placed against its nearest rivals, the 5600GT sits within a narrow band. It trails the Intel Core i5-12490F by 0.3%, the Intel Xeon 6325P by 0.4%, the Intel Core Ultra 5 125U by 0.4%, and the AMD EPYC 7J13 by 0.5%. The 7533HS sits even with the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V at a 0% delta, trails the Intel Core i5-1345U by 0.2%, leads the Intel Core i7-8700K by 0.7%, and trails the Intel Core i7-10700F by 0.7%.

The Verdict

The data points in one direction. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS in every recorded head-to-head benchmark. The 40% margins across Cinebench workloads and the 60.8% margin in extended instructions indicate a consistent and substantial performance advantage.

The 7533HS does have structural advantages in the database: a smaller 6 nm process, DDR5 memory support with higher bandwidth, PCIe Gen 4 with more lanes, and a lower 35 W TDP. These traits suit mobile deployment where power efficiency and platform features matter. But the recorded benchmark results do not translate those traits into higher scores.

The 5600GT also carries a launch MSRP of $140, while the 7533HS has no recorded launch MSRP. The 5600GT targets the desktop socket AM4, and the 7533HS targets mobile socket FP7, so the two are not direct platform competitors.

For raw compute performance, the 5600GT is the clear choice based on the recorded measurements. For a mobile platform with DDR5 and PCIe Gen 4, the 7533HS is the only one of the two that fits that socket and power profile.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in the following recorded fields:

• Series: 5000 series for the 5600GT, 7000 series for the 7533HS.
• Base clock: 3.60 GHz for the 5600GT, 3.30 GHz for the 7533HS.
• Boost clock: 4.60 GHz for the 5600GT, 4.40 GHz for the 7533HS.
• TDP: 65 W for the 5600GT, 35 W for the 7533HS.
• Socket: AMD Socket AM4 for the 5600GT, AMD Socket FP7 for the 7533HS.
• Architecture: Zen 3 for the 5600GT, Zen 3+ for the 7533HS.
• Codename: Cezanne for the 5600GT, Rembrandt-R for the 7533HS.
• Process node: 7 nm for the 5600GT, 6 nm for the 7533HS.
• Transistors: 10,700 million for the 5600GT, not recorded for the 7533HS.
• Die size: 180 mm² for the 5600GT, 208 mm² for the 7533HS.
• L3 cache description: 16 MB for the 5600GT, 16 MB (shared) for the 7533HS.
• Memory support: DDR4 for the 5600GT, DDR5 for the 7533HS.
• Memory bandwidth: 51.2 GB/s for the 5600GT, 76.8 GB/s for the 7533HS.
• PCIe: Gen 3, 16 lanes for the 5600GT, Gen 4, 20 lanes for the 7533HS.
• Integrated graphics: Radeon Vega 7 for the 5600GT, Radeon 660M for the 7533HS.
• Market segment: Desktop for the 5600GT, Mobile for the 7533HS.
• Release date: 2024-01-07 for the 5600GT, 2024-08-31 for the 7533HS.
• Launch MSRP: $140 for the 5600GT, not recorded for the 7533HS.
• Multiplier unlocked: true for the 5600GT, false for the 7533HS.
• Part number: 100-000001488 for the 5600GT, 100-000001632(FP7)100-000001634(FP7r2) for the 7533HS.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT wins every recorded benchmark comparison. Its strongest areas are extended instructions with a 60.8% lead, data compression with a 53.5% lead, random string sorting with a 48.2% lead, and data encryption with a 48.1% lead. These are compute-heavy workloads where the higher clocks and desktop power envelope show up directly. The Cinebench suite shows a uniform 40% class advantage, indicating that both single-threaded and multi-threaded rendering tasks favor the 5600GT.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS does not win any head-to-head benchmark in the database. However, the specification data points to areas where it holds a structural edge that benchmarks here do not capture. Its DDR5 memory support provides 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth versus 51.2 GB/s, a platform-level advantage for memory-sensitive workloads. Its PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes doubles the interface generation and adds lanes over the 5600GT's Gen 3 with 16 lanes. Its smaller 6 nm process and 35 W TDP indicate a lower power envelope for mobile chassis. Its Radeon 660M integrated graphics differ from the Radeon Vega 7 in the 5600GT, though no graphics benchmark data is recorded for either.

The use-case split follows the market segments. The 5600GT is a desktop part, socketed in AM4, unlocked for multiplier adjustment, and delivers consistently higher compute scores. The 7533HS is a mobile part, socketed in FP7, locked, and built around a lower power target with newer memory and PCIe standards. Users on a desktop platform with AM4 who prioritize compute performance should look to the 5600GT. Users on a mobile platform requiring FP7, DDR5, and PCIe Gen 4 will use the 7533HS, accepting the lower benchmark scores recorded in the database.