AMD Ryzen 5 240 vs AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the AMD Ryzen 5 240 and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i?

A: The Ryzen 5 240 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has 12 cores and 24 threads. The P185i offers double the core count and double the thread count.

Q: How do their base and boost clocks compare?

A: The Ryzen 5 240 runs a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Ryzen AI Embedded P185i runs a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The 240 has a much higher base clock, while the P185i has a slightly higher boost clock.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for each processor?

A: The Ryzen 5 240 has a TDP of 45 watts, and the Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has a TDP of 28 watts. The P185i is rated for lower power consumption.

Q: Which processor uses which integrated graphics?

A: The Ryzen 5 240 uses the Radeon 760M integrated graphics. The Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses the Radeon 890M integrated graphics.

Q: Do these processors support ECC memory?

A: The Ryzen 5 240 does not support ECC memory. The Ryzen AI Embedded P185i does support ECC memory.

Q: What are their process nodes and die sizes?

A: Both processors are built on TSMC's 4 nm process node. The Ryzen 5 240 has a die size of 178 mm² and contains 25,000 million transistors. The Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has a die size of 233 mm².

Architecture Differences

The Ryzen 5 240 and the Ryzen AI Embedded P185i represent two distinct architectural approaches within AMD's mobile lineup. The Ryzen 5 240 belongs to the Hawk Point generation, built on the Zen 4 architecture. In contrast, the Ryzen AI Embedded P185i is part of the Gorgon Point generation, which uses a hybrid arrangement of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. This generational split alone accounts for significant differences in how each processor allocates resources and executes instructions.

The memory hierarchy differs in several respects. Both processors feature 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. However, the L1 cache configuration is not the same. The Ryzen 5 240 uses 64 KB of L1 cache per core, while the Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The larger L1 cache per core on the P185i aligns with the newer core design, which typically benefits from wider and deeper cache structures.

The integrated graphics solutions also differ. The Ryzen 5 240 pairs with the Radeon 760M, while the Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses the Radeon 890M. The Radeon 890M represents a newer generation of integrated graphics, which typically provides higher compute throughput and more advanced feature support. The Radeon 760M, while capable, is built around an older graphics architecture.

Memory support reveals another architectural distinction. The Ryzen 5 240 supports DDR5 memory only. The Ryzen AI Embedded P185i supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, giving it broader flexibility for system designers targeting different power and performance envelopes. Both processors use a dual-channel memory bus with an identical peak memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

PCIe connectivity differs as well. The Ryzen 5 240 provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The Ryzen AI Embedded P185i provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The 240 offers more available PCIe lanes, which can matter for systems that need to attach multiple high-bandwidth devices directly to the processor.

ECC memory support is a notable architectural difference. The Ryzen 5 240 lacks ECC support, while the Ryzen AI Embedded P185i includes ECC support. This makes the P185i more suitable for workloads where data integrity and error correction are critical requirements.

The die sizes reflect the different core counts and designs. The Ryzen 5 240 measures 178 mm², while the Ryzen AI Embedded P185i measures 233 mm². The larger die on the P185i accommodates the additional cores and the newer graphics block, even though both processors are manufactured on the same 4 nm TSMC node.

The Verdict

The data indicates two processors with different intended roles. The Ryzen 5 240 is a high-clock, 6-core part that posts strong single-thread and multi-thread scores in Cinebench tests. Its 45 W TDP and 20 PCIe lanes suggest it is designed for performance-focused mobile systems where responsiveness and per-core throughput matter most.

The Ryzen AI Embedded P185i, with 12 cores and 24 threads, doubles the core count and supports ECC memory. Its lower 28 W TDP, despite the higher core count, indicates a power-conscious design that prioritizes throughput per watt. The inclusion of LPDDR5X memory support and the Radeon 890M graphics points toward embedded and AI-centric workloads where memory bandwidth efficiency and integrated compute are more important than raw clock speed.

The benchmark data only covers the Ryzen 5 240, which sits at the 84th percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H with an average score of 33537 and a delta of 0%, the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS and AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX, both at 33667 and 33668 with deltas of -0.4%, and the Intel Core i5-12600HX at 33375 with a delta of 0.5%. The P185i has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so its comparative standing cannot be quantified.

For users who need high per-core clock speeds and proven multi-thread performance in a compact 6-core package, the Ryzen 5 240 is the clear choice from the recorded data. For users who require 12 cores, ECC memory, and lower power consumption, the Ryzen AI Embedded P185i is the only option between the two that offers those features. The P185i sacrifices base clock and proven benchmark scores, but it delivers a broader core count and embedded-specific capabilities.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 240 | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 6 | 12 |

| Threads | 12 | 24 |

| Base Clock | 4.30 GHz | 2.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.10 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 28 W |

| Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 5 / Zen 5c |

| Codename | Hawk Point | Gorgon Point |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 4 nm |

| Die Size | 178 mm² | 233 mm² |

| Transistors | 25,000 million | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 16 MB |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 760M | Radeon 890M |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |

| Production Status | Active | Active |

| Release Date | 2025-01-05 | 2026-02-28 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the Ryzen 5 240 and the Ryzen AI Embedded P185i are not available in the database. The head-to-head benchmark list is empty, and the win counters for both processors are zero. This means no direct measurement of one against the other exists.

The available benchmark data covers only the Ryzen 5 240. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 13013, and its single-core score is 1742. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2078 multi-core and 270 single-core. These scores place the processor at the 84th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

The PassMark suite provides additional measurements for the Ryzen 5 240. Its multi-thread score is 22658, and its single-thread score is 3675. The data compression score is 267963, data encryption scores 15849, and extended instructions score 20201. Floating point math scores 45301, integer math scores 73189, prime number finding scores 70, physics scores 1060, and random string sorting scores 32385. The average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 33542.

The nearest rivals for the Ryzen 5 240 show how tightly grouped this performance tier is. The Intel Core Ultra 7 255H averages 33537, a delta of 0%. The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS averages 33667, which is 0.4% behind. The AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX averages 33668, also 0.4% behind. The Intel Core i5-12600HX averages 33375, which puts it 0.5% ahead of the 240. These deltas indicate that the Ryzen 5 240 performs essentially on par with several mainstream laptop processors, with differences of less than one percent.

The Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has no recorded benchmark scores, no average benchmark score, and no nearest rivals in the database. Its percentile ranking is listed at 50, which appears to be a default or unmeasured value rather than a calculated percentile from actual test results.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 5 240 wins in any scenario that relies on measured benchmark performance, because it is the only one of the two with recorded data in the database. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13013 and single-core score of 1742 indicate a processor that delivers strong all-around throughput for its 6-core, 12-thread configuration. The base clock of 4.30 GHz suggests that lightly threaded workloads, such as everyday desktop tasks, application launches, and single-threaded productivity software, will benefit from the high per-core clock speed. The 45 W TDP provides more thermal headroom for sustained operation under load.

The Ryzen AI Embedded P185i wins on features that the Ryzen 5 240 does not offer. Its 12 cores and 24 threads provide twice the parallel execution capacity, which is relevant for multi-threaded embedded workloads, virtualization, and AI inference tasks that can scale across many cores. The support for ECC memory makes it suitable for systems where silent data corruption is unacceptable, such as financial modeling, scientific computing, or long-running server-like workloads. The LPDDR5X memory support allows system designers to use low-power memory modules, which can reduce overall platform power consumption. The Radeon 890M integrated graphics represents a newer generation than the Radeon 760M, which likely provides better integrated graphics performance for visual compute tasks. The lower 28 W TDP means the P185i can fit into thermally constrained designs that cannot accommodate the 45 W Ryzen 5 240.

The Ryzen 5 240 also wins on PCIe connectivity, offering 20 Gen 4 lanes compared to the 16 Gen 4 lanes on the P185i. This gives the 240 more direct bandwidth for NVMe storage, discrete GPUs, or other PCIe peripherals. The 240 has a much higher base clock, 4.30 GHz versus 2.00 GHz, which gives it a significant advantage in workloads that do not scale with core count and rely on single-thread performance.

The P185i's boost clock of 5.10 GHz edges out the 240's 5.00 GHz, but without benchmark data to confirm real-world behavior, that 0.10 GHz advantage cannot be quantified in practice. The P185i also has a larger die at 233 mm², which accommodates its additional cores and newer graphics block.

In summary, the Ryzen 5 240 is the processor to choose when documented performance, high clock speeds, and more PCIe lanes are the priority. The Ryzen AI Embedded P185i is the processor to choose when core count, ECC memory, low power consumption, and embedded-specific features like LPDDR5X support take precedence over measured benchmark results.