AMD Ryzen 5 150 vs AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare between the AMD Ryzen 5 150 and the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS?

A: Both processors are identical in this regard. Each has 6 cores and 12 threads, with the same base clock of 3.30 GHz and a TDP of 35 W.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 150 boosts to 4.55 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS boosts to 4.40 GHz. The difference is 0.15 GHz in favor of the Ryzen 5 150.

Q: What is the performance percentile ranking for each chip in the database?

A: The Ryzen 5 150 sits at the 84th percentile of all CPUs, whereas the Ryzen 5 7533HS sits at the 73rd percentile. This indicates the Ryzen 5 150 is positioned higher in overall performance distribution.

Q: Which chip wins in single-threaded performance?

A: The Ryzen 5 150 scores 3155 in the PassMark single-thread test, which is 15.1% higher than the 2740 scored by the Ryzen 5 7533HS.

Q: Do both processors use the same integrated graphics?

A: Yes, both feature a Radeon 660M integrated GPU. They also share the same memory support (DDR5), dual-channel memory bus, and memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Q: Which processor has more wins in the head-to-head benchmark suite?

A: The Ryzen 5 150 wins 9 of the 11 recorded head-to-head tests. The Ryzen 5 7533HS wins only 2 tests, specifically find prime numbers and physics.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share a substantial architectural foundation. Both are built on the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename, fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process node. Both use the AMD Socket FP7. The L1 cache is 64 KB per core and the L2 cache is 512 KB per core on each, with a shared 16 MB L3 cache. Neither supports ECC memory, neither has an unlocked multiplier, and both belong to the mobile market segment.

The most visible difference is the die size. The Ryzen 5 150 measures 210 mm², while the Ryzen 5 7533HS measures 208 mm². That 2 mm² difference is minor and likely reflects packaging or minor layout revisions rather than a functional change. The Ryzen 5 150 belongs to the Ryzen 5 generation under the Zen 3+ (Rembrandt) naming, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS is explicitly listed as part of the 7000 series. The part numbers differ as well: the Ryzen 5 150 uses 100-000000990 (FP7r2), while the Ryzen 5 7533HS uses 100-000001632 (FP7) and 100-000001634 (FP7r2), indicating the 7533HS has broader socket compatibility across both FP7 and FP7r2 revisions.

Release timing also separates the pair. The Ryzen 5 7533HS arrived in the database with a release date of 2024-08-31, while the Ryzen 5 150 was released later on 2025-09-30. Both remain in active production. The PCIe interface is identical: Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. Memory bandwidth is also identical at 76.8 GB/s over dual-channel DDR5. In short, the architecture is nearly the same silicon; the Ryzen 5 150 differentiates itself primarily through a higher boost clock and a slightly larger die.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data shows a clear and consistent advantage for the AMD Ryzen 5 150 across most workloads. The largest margin comes in extended instructions, where the Ryzen 5 150 scores 14675 versus 11219 for the Ryzen 5 7533HS, a 30.8% lead. This suggests the newer chip handles specialized instruction sets more efficiently, which matters for encryption, compression, and similar workloads.

In random string sorting, the Ryzen 5 150 posts 22382 against 17669, a 26.7% advantage. Floating point math follows closely: 35118 versus 27800, a 26.3% edge. Data compression and data encryption both show identical deltas: the Ryzen 5 150 leads with 211289 versus 168692 in compression and 13425 versus 10718 in encryption, each a 25.3% improvement. Integer math tells a similar story: 62151 for the Ryzen 5 150 versus 50800, a 22.3% lead.

The multithreaded PassMark score favors the Ryzen 5 150 at 17492 versus 14520, a 20.5% difference. Single-thread performance is also notably better: 3155 versus 2740, a 15.1% edge in both single-thread and singlethread tests, which are recorded with identical values. These results align with the higher boost clock of 4.55 GHz on the Ryzen 5 150 versus 4.40 GHz on the 7533HS.

The Ryzen 5 7533HS does take two narrow wins. In find prime numbers, it scores 48 against 47, a 2.1% margin. In physics, it scores 821 against 806, a 1.8% margin. These are the only two tests where the older chip leads, and both margins are small enough to be considered negligible in practical terms.

Average benchmark scores reinforce the gap. The Ryzen 5 150 has an average benchmark score of 34881, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS averages 19364. That is a substantial overall difference, though part of it stems from the fact that the 7533HS also carries Cinebench results in the database, including Cinebench R23 multicore at 12342 and single-core at 1742, which are not present for the 150. The PassMark-centric head-to-head comparison still shows the 150 ahead in 9 of 11 tests.

The nearest rival data places each chip in different performance tiers. The Ryzen 5 150 sits alongside the Intel Xeon 6349P at an average score of 34890 with a 0% delta, the Intel Core 7 253PTE at 34962 with a -0.2% delta, the Intel Core i7-13800H at 34988 with a -0.3% delta, and the Intel Core i9-12900HX at 35003 with a -0.3% delta. Those are all high-end desktop or workstation parts. The Ryzen 5 7533HS, by contrast, sits alongside the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V at 19368 with a 0% delta, the Intel Core i5-1345U at 19411 with a -0.2% delta, the Intel Core i7-8700K at 19238 with a 0.7% delta, and the Intel Core i7-10700F at 19499 with a -0.7% delta. The gap between the two chips is roughly the gap between a modern desktop-class CPU and a previous-generation desktop CPU.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in only a handful of recorded fields. The boost clock is higher on the Ryzen 5 150 at 4.55 GHz versus 4.40 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7533HS. The die size is 210 mm² for the Ryzen 5 150 and 208 mm² for the Ryzen 5 7533HS. The release date is later for the Ryzen 5 150: 2025-09-30 versus 2024-08-31. The series field is empty for the Ryzen 5 150, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS is listed under the 7000 series. The part numbers also differ, with the 7533HS supporting both FP7 and FP7r2 revisions and the 150 listed only for FP7r2.

All other major specifications are identical. Core count, thread count, base clock, TDP, socket, architecture, codename, process node, foundry, cache structure, memory type, memory bus, memory bandwidth, ECC support, PCIe configuration, integrated GPU, market segment, production status, and multiplier lock status match exactly. The average benchmark score difference, 34881 versus 19364, is not a specification but it does reflect the performance delta recorded across the benchmark suite.

The Verdict

The data points to the AMD Ryzen 5 150 as the stronger processor in nearly every measurable workload. Its 15.1% single-thread lead and 20.5% multithread lead over the Ryzen 5 7533HS come from a modest boost clock increase, from 4.40 GHz to 4.55 GHz, combined with the same 6-core, 12-thread layout. The 84th percentile placement versus the 73rd percentile placement confirms that the Ryzen 5 150 competes in a higher performance class, one populated by parts like the Intel Core i7-13800H and Intel Core i9-12900HX, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS sits near the Intel Core i7-8700K and Intel Core i5-1345U.

The Ryzen 5 7533HS does hold two benchmark wins, in find prime numbers and physics, but both margins are below 2.1%. These wins do not offset the 25% or greater deficits it faces in data compression, data encryption, extended instructions, floating point math, and random string sorting. Buyers choosing between the two should note that the Ryzen 5 150 is the newer release, carries a higher boost clock, and delivers a performance profile closer to desktop-class rivals. The Ryzen 5 7533HS remains an active, capable mobile part, but the recorded data gives it no advantage beyond two narrowly won tests.