AMD Ryzen 5 130 vs AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a complete benchmark suite for the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS, while the AMD Ryzen 5 130 has no recorded benchmark scores. This asymmetry means the head-to-head comparison is based on the 7533HS's measured performance against its nearest rivals, with the Ryzen 5 130's capabilities inferred from its architectural specifications.

The Ryzen 5 7533HS posts an average benchmark score of 19,364 across all recorded tests, placing it at the 73rd percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, scores 19,368, a delta of 0 percent, indicating statistical equivalence. The Intel Core i5-1345U trails by 0.2 percent with a score of 19,411, while the Intel Core i7-8700K comes within 0.7 percent at 19,238. The Intel Core i7-10700F leads the group at 19,499, putting the 7533HS 0.7 percent behind.

In multi-core Cinebench testing, the 7533HS delivers strong results. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,342 shows substantial throughput for a 35 W mobile processor. The Cinebench R20 multi-core result of 5,183 and the R15 multi-core score of 1,243 follow the same pattern, confirming consistent scaling across Cinebench versions. Single-core results are equally consistent: Cinebench R23 single-core at 1,742, R20 single-core at 731, and R15 single-core at 175.

PassMark tests reveal specific strengths. The multi-thread score of 14,520 indicates solid parallel performance, while the single-thread score of 2,740 shows competitive per-core capability. Integer math reaches 50,800, floating point math hits 27,800, and extended instructions score 11,219. Data compression scores 168,692, data encryption reaches 10,718, and random string sorting produces 17,669. Physics simulation scores 821, and prime number finding completes at 48.

The Ryzen 5 130 has no benchmark entries in the database, so direct numerical comparison between the two processors is impossible. The 130's specifications, including a 2.90 GHz base clock and 4.55 GHz boost clock, suggest different performance characteristics than the 7533HS, which runs at 3.30 GHz base and 4.40 GHz boost. The higher base clock of the 7533HS likely contributes to better sustained workloads, while the 130's higher boost clock may favor short burst tasks.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 5 7533HS demonstrates clear wins in every measured benchmark category because it is the only one of the two with recorded data. Its 35 W TDP allows sustained performance across multi-threaded workloads, as shown by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,342 and PassMark multi-thread score of 14,520. These results place it in the upper quartile of all CPUs, at the 73rd percentile, making it suitable for demanding productivity applications, content creation, and software compilation.

The Ryzen 5 130, lacking benchmark data, cannot claim any measured wins. Its specifications point to potential advantages in burst performance due to the 4.55 GHz boost clock, which exceeds the 7533HS's 4.40 GHz boost. The 130 also has a lower 28 W TDP, which may allow thinner laptop designs with reduced cooling requirements. However, without recorded scores, the database cannot quantify these potential advantages.

For single-threaded tasks, the 7533HS's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,742 and PassMark single-thread score of 2,740 indicate strong responsiveness for everyday applications, web browsing, and office work. The 130's higher boost clock might deliver slightly better peak single-thread performance, but this remains speculative without benchmark confirmation.

For multi-threaded workloads, the 7533HS's measured results show it handles parallel tasks efficiently. The PassMark integer math score of 50,800 and floating point math score of 27,800 demonstrate balanced computational capability. Data encryption at 10,718 and data compression at 168,692 further confirm its versatility. The 130's identical core and thread count, 6 cores and 12 threads, suggests similar parallel scaling, but its lower base clock may reduce sustained multi-core throughput.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the same fundamental architecture: Zen 3+ microarchitecture with the Rembrandt-R codename, built on TSMC's 6 nm process node. Both use the AMD Socket FP7 and feature 6 cores with 12 threads. The cache hierarchy is identical: 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3.

The die sizes differ slightly. The Ryzen 5 130 measures 210 mm², while the Ryzen 5 7533HS measures 208 mm². This 2 mm² difference is negligible and likely reflects minor layout variations rather than meaningful architectural changes.

Clock speeds differ notably. The 130 runs at 2.90 GHz base and 4.55 GHz boost, while the 7533HS runs at 3.30 GHz base and 4.40 GHz boost. The 7533HS has a 0.40 GHz higher base clock, which benefits sustained workloads, while the 130 has a 0.15 GHz higher boost clock for peak performance. TDP also differs: the 130 is rated at 28 W, the 7533HS at 35 W. The higher TDP of the 7533HS likely allows it to maintain higher clocks under load.

Memory support is identical: both use DDR5 with dual-channel configuration and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. PCIe connectivity matches as well, with Gen 4 and 20 lanes (CPU only). Both integrate the Radeon 660M graphics unit.

ECC memory support differs. The 130 supports ECC memory, while the 7533HS does not. This makes the 130 potentially suitable for entry-level workstation or server applications where error-correcting memory is required. The 7533HS targets mainstream mobile use where ECC is typically unnecessary.

The part numbers differ: the 130 uses 100-000000992 (FP7r2), while the 7533HS uses 100-000001632 (FP7) and 100-000001634 (FP7r2). The dual part numbers for the 7533HS suggest broader socket compatibility. Release dates also differ: the 7533HS launched on 2024-08-31, while the 130 launched on 2025-09-30, over a year later.

Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and both target the mobile market segment. Both are currently active in production.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has a 4.55 GHz boost clock, which is 0.15 GHz higher than the Ryzen 5 7533HS's 4.40 GHz boost clock.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Ryzen 5 130 supports ECC memory, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS does not.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Ryzen 5 130 has a 28 W TDP, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS has a 35 W TDP, a 7 W difference.

Q: Which processor has better measured multi-core performance?

A: Only the Ryzen 5 7533HS has recorded benchmarks. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 12,342, placing it at the 73rd percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Are the integrated graphics the same?

A: Yes, both processors integrate the Radeon 660M graphics unit.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth for both processors?

A: Both support DDR5 dual-channel memory with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 130 | AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS |

|---|---|---|

| Base Clock | 2.90 GHz | 3.30 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.55 GHz | 4.40 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 35 W |

| Die Size | 210 mm² | 208 mm² |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| Release Date | 2025-09-30 | 2024-08-31 |

| Part Number | 100-000000992 (FP7r2) | 100-000001632 (FP7), 100-000001634 (FP7r2) |

Shared specifications include 6 cores, 12 threads, Zen 3+ architecture, Rembrandt-R codename, 6 nm TSMC process, AMD Socket FP7, 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, 16 MB shared L3, DDR5 memory support, dual-channel memory bus, 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth, Gen 4 PCIe with 20 lanes, Radeon 660M integrated graphics, mobile market segment, active production status, and locked multipliers.