SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400F

32,279 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

21,035 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 pairing represents a balanced desktop configuration that targets high-refresh 1080p gaming and mainstream productivity. The data indicates a system where the GPU is the primary constraint in modern titles, while the CPU provides substantial headroom for less demanding workloads. This analysis breaks down the benchmark results, gaming performance, and the specific use cases where this hardware combination excels or falls short.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance relationship between the Core i5-14400F and the RTX 5050 shows a clear division of labor. The CPU, with its 10 cores and 16 threads, delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result that indicates the processor is rarely the limiting factor in gaming scenarios. In contrast, the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2502 places it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs, and its Passmark G3D score of 17326 confirms a mid-range positioning.

The bottleneck analysis is best illustrated by the FPS scaling across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system achieves an average of 105.7 FPS across all measured games, which is a figure that suggests a balanced pairing. However, the drop-off when moving to higher resolutions is steep. In Cyberpunk 2077, performance falls from 48 FPS at 1080p to 36 FPS at 1440p, and then to 24 FPS at 4K. This pattern is consistent across the game list, such as Red Dead Redemption 2 dropping from 44 FPS to 33 FPS and then 22 FPS. The consistent ~70% scaling from 1080p to 1440p indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck, as the CPU’s performance headroom is not fully utilized in these scenarios.

The CPU’s single-threaded strength, evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 2058 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3701, ensures that frame pacing remains consistent even when the GPU is under heavy load. The data suggests that lowering graphical settings or resolution will yield significant FPS gains because the GPU is the constraint, while the CPU can maintain high frame rates in CPU-bound titles like Counter-Strike 2, where it hits 163 FPS at 1080p.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5050 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using a 5 nm process at TSMC. It packs 16,900 million transistors on a 149 mm² die. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a modest configuration by modern standards, and the 8 GB capacity becomes a limiting factor at higher resolutions and with demanding textures, as seen in the significant performance drops at 4K.

The GPU’s compute capabilities include 2560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. It features 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores, which support the DirectX 12 Ultimate feature set and enable ray tracing and DLSS workloads. The FP32 performance of 13.17 TFLOPS is identical to the FP16 rating, indicating a 1:1 ratio that is common in this class. The pixel rate is 82.30 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 205.8 GTexel/s.

Benchmark results show the GPU’s position relative to its peers. Its average benchmark score of 21035 is within 1.6% of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT, which scores 20713, and 0.6% below the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL. The Passmark G3D score of 17326 reinforces this mid-range placement. In compute workloads, the Geekbench OpenCL score of 90334 and Vulkan score of 89381 indicate that the GPU handles general-purpose tasks competently, but the Passmark GPU Compute score of 9184 suggests it is not a compute powerhouse. The DirectX 12 Passmark score of 66 is notably lower than the DirectX 11 score of 150, which may indicate driver overhead in newer APIs or a limitation of the benchmark itself.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i5-14400F delivers strong multi-threaded performance with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 11268. Its average benchmark score of 32279 places it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. This is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, which scores 32233, a delta of just 0.1%. It also edges out the Intel Core i9-11900 by 0.2% and the Intel Core i7-12800H by 0.5%, while trailing the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS by 0.2%. The CPU’s Passmark multi-thread score of 25470 further confirms its capability in heavily threaded applications.

The GPU’s performance is more modest. With an average benchmark score of 21035, it sits in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL, scores 21153, a delta of -0.6%, meaning the RTX 5050 is slightly slower. The NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile is 1.6% faster, while the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT is 1.6% slower. The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing is 75th, which is a solid indicator of overall system capability.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad, the GPU scores 2502, which is a representative measure of its DirectX 12 gaming performance. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 89381 is slightly lower than the OpenCL score of 90334, showing that the GPU performs similarly across different compute APIs. These scores, when combined with the CPU’s strong showing, paint a picture of a system that is well-suited for 1080p gaming with high settings, but will struggle to maintain high frame rates at 4K.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The system excels at 1080p competitive gaming. Counter-Strike 2 achieves 163 FPS, Valorant hits 375 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege runs at 194 FPS. These figures allow for smooth gameplay on high-refresh monitors, and the CPU’s strong single-thread performance ensures minimal input lag.

Streaming: The CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads, combined with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645, provide enough headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU’s tensor cores can also offload encoding tasks, though the 8 GB VRAM may be a constraint when running a game and streaming simultaneously at high settings.

Video Editing: The CPU’s multi-core performance, evidenced by a Passmark multi-thread score of 25470, is well-suited for video encoding and rendering timelines. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 90334 provides acceleration for effects and color grading. This combination is capable of handling 1080p and some 1440p editing projects efficiently.

3D Rendering: The GPU’s FP32 performance of 13.17 TFLOPS and the CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9090 indicate that this system can handle basic 3D rendering tasks. However, the 8 GB VRAM may limit the size of scenes that can be rendered without spilling into system memory.

Software Development: The CPU’s strong single-core and multi-core scores, such as a Geekbench single-core score of 2058, make it responsive for code compilation and running virtual machines. The 20 MB of shared L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data, and the support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory provides flexibility in build configuration.

Student and Office Work: The system is overkill for basic office tasks, but the Passmark data encryption score of 16949 and data compression score of 315521 mean that file archiving and security tasks are handled quickly. The CPU’s 65W TDP contributes to a system that is efficient for daily use, and the lack of integrated graphics means the GPU is always active.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pair?

A: The pairing achieves a combined percentile of 75, indicating it performs better than 75% of all tested systems.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F is 0.2% faster than the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS in average benchmark scores, with the Intel scoring 32279 versus 32354 for the AMD.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The RTX 5050 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s.

Q: Which is the closest rival to the RTX 5050 in benchmark scores?

A: The AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL is the closest rival, with a score of 21153, which is 0.6% higher than the RTX 5050’s score of 21035.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz and a base clock of 2.50 GHz.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the i5-14400F has no integrated graphics (N/A), so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the average FPS across all measured games for this system?

A: The pair achieves an average of 105.7 FPS across all games measured at various resolutions.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data for this system, captured at ultra settings, shows a clear trend of strong 1080p performance with significant degradation at higher resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system delivers playable frame rates in most titles. Valorant leads with 375 FPS, followed by Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 361 FPS, and Roblox at 211 FPS. Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege hits 194 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 achieves 163 FPS. These are figures that support high-refresh gaming.

For AAA titles, the performance is more moderate. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 48 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 44 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended dips to 24 FPS. At 2560x1440, these numbers fall to 36 FPS, 33 FPS, and 15 FPS respectively. The 4K results are largely unplayable for demanding games, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 24 FPS and Ark: Survival Ascended at 8 FPS. Even esports titles suffer at 4K, with Counter-Strike 2 dropping to 60 FPS and Valorant to 256 FPS.

The data indicates that the 8 GB VRAM is a limiting factor at higher resolutions. Games like Fortnite, which uses significant texture memory, drop from 78 FPS at 1080p to 26 FPS at 4K. The pattern is consistent: the system is optimized for 1080p gaming with high settings, and users should expect to lower settings or use upscaling technologies for 1440p gaming. The system’s rank of 2446 out of 3732 pairs by average FPS places it in the lower-middle tier of all tested systems.

Who Should Build It

This system is ideal for gamers who prioritize 1080p performance and competitive titles. The high frame rates in Valorant, Counter-Strike 2, and Rainbow Six Siege make it a strong choice for esports enthusiasts. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking ensures that the system will not become obsolete quickly, and the GPU’s 66th percentile is adequate for current 1080p titles.

Content creators who work primarily with 1080p video will find the CPU’s multi-core performance sufficient for rendering and export tasks. The Passmark data compression score of 315521 indicates that file management and compression workflows are handled efficiently. Software developers will benefit from the CPU’s strong single-thread performance, which speeds up compilation times, and the support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory allows for flexible build options.

Students and office workers will find this system more powerful than necessary for basic tasks, but the headroom means it will remain responsive for years. The 65W TDP of the CPU keeps power consumption moderate, and the system’s overall efficiency is a benefit for daily use. Small business workstations that require occasional 3D rendering or video editing will also find this pairing capable, though the 8 GB VRAM may be a constraint for large projects.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i5-14400F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050. The CPU is part of the Core 14th Gen series, based on the Raptor Lake architecture and manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel. It features 10 cores and 16 threads with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The GPU is from the GeForce 50-series, using the Blackwell 2.0 architecture on a 5 nm process at TSMC.

The overall tier of this build, based on the 75th combined percentile, is upper-mid-range. The CPU is a strong performer in its class, but the GPU is the limiting factor for high-resolution gaming. The system is best suited for 1080p gaming with high settings, where it delivers an average of 105.7 FPS across all measured games. For users seeking a balance between CPU and GPU performance in a desktop form factor, this pairing offers a solid foundation. The build class is desktop, and the components are both currently in active production, indicating ongoing availability.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake-R architecture, which is a refresh of the Raptor Lake design. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel with a die size of 215 mm². The base clock is 2.50 GHz, and it can boost up to 4.70 GHz. The CPU has a 65W TDP and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It is not multiplier unlocked, meaning overclocking is limited.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. This cache configuration helps with data locality and reduces latency for frequently accessed data. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation-oriented processors. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the CPU.

Benchmark results show the CPU’s strengths. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 and the Geekbench multi-core score of 11268 indicate strong multi-threaded performance. The single-core scores are equally impressive, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 3055 and Geekbench single-core at 2058. In Passmark tests, the CPU scores 25470 in multi-thread and 3701 in single-thread. Passmark data compression scores 315521, while data encryption scores 16949.

The CPU’s nearest rivals by average benchmark score are the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, which is 0.1% slower, and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS, which is 0.2% faster. It also compares favorably to the Intel Core i9-11900 and Core i7-12800H. The 83rd percentile ranking means the CPU outperforms the majority of processors in the database. For real workloads, this translates to responsive system performance in everyday tasks, efficient compilation in development environments, and strong performance in video encoding and 3D rendering when paired with a capable GPU. The CPU’s lack of integrated graphics requires a discrete GPU, which is present in this build.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14400F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds