AMD FirePro W4300
AMD graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
AMDAMD FirePro W4300 Specifications
FirePro W4300 GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The AMD FirePro W4300 GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
FirePro W4300 Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the FirePro W4300's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The FirePro W4300 by AMD dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
AMD's FirePro W4300 Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The FirePro W4300's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
FirePro W4300 by AMD Cache
On-chip cache hierarchy
On-chip cache provides ultra-fast data access for the FirePro W4300, reducing the need to fetch data from slower VRAM. L1 and L2 caches store frequently accessed data close to the compute units. AMD's Infinity Cache (L3) dramatically increases effective bandwidth, improving GPU benchmark performance without requiring wider memory buses. Larger cache sizes help maintain high frame rates in memory-bound scenarios and reduce power consumption by minimizing VRAM accesses.
FirePro W4300 Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the AMD FirePro W4300 against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
GCN 2.0 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The AMD FirePro W4300 is built on AMD's GCN 2.0 architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the FirePro W4300 will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
AMD's FirePro W4300 Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the AMD FirePro W4300 determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the FirePro W4300 to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
FirePro W4300 by AMD Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the AMD FirePro W4300 are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
AMD API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the AMD FirePro W4300. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
FirePro W4300 Product Information
Release and pricing details
The AMD FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the FirePro W4300 by AMD represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
FirePro W4300 Benchmark Scores
geekbench_openclSource
Geekbench OpenCL tests GPU compute performance using the cross-platform OpenCL API. This shows how AMD FirePro W4300 handles parallel computing tasks like video encoding and scientific simulations. OpenCL is widely supported across different GPU vendors and platforms. Higher scores benefit applications that leverage GPU acceleration for non-graphics workloads.
Top 5 Performers
Top 5 PerformersNearby Performers
Nearby PerformersAbout AMD FirePro W4300
The AMD FirePro W4300 is a professional workstation GPU built on the GCN 2.0 architecture using a 28 nm process at TSMC. It integrates 2,080 million transistors on a 160 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 13.0M per mm². The card features 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 16 ROPs, paired with 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus delivering 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth. Its memory clock runs at 1500 MHz (6 Gbps effective). In the Geekbench OpenCL benchmark, it scores 11,187 points, placing it at the 49th percentile of all GPUs.
Who Should Consider It
The 49th percentile ranking indicates that the FirePro W4300 sits near the middle of the performance distribution among all GPUs in the database. This makes it a reasonable choice for entry-level professional compute tasks where the workload does not demand extreme throughput. The 4 GB frame buffer and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for moderately sized datasets in applications like CAD, 3D modeling, or scientific visualization. The card’s single-slot design, 50 W TDP, and absence of power connectors allow installation in compact workstations or legacy systems that lack spare power cables or physical space. The four mini-DisplayPort 1.2 outputs support multi-monitor setups, which is common in professional environments. Given its release date of 2015-11-30 and end-of-life production status, it is a legacy product; however, its 1,428.5 GFLOPS FP32 performance and 14.88 GPixel/s pixel rate can still handle basic rendering and compute workloads. The lack of RT cores and tensor cores means it is not intended for ray tracing or AI acceleration; those workloads are outside its scope. For users who need a low-power, single-slot card with moderate OpenCL performance, the W4300 fits well, especially in systems where power and space are constrained.
How It Compares
The FirePro W4300’s nearest rivals in the benchmark database are all within a narrow performance band, with deltas of less than 2%. Against the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M, the W4300 scores 11,187 versus 11,173, a 0.1% advantage. This difference is negligible, placing the two cards in the same performance tier. Compared to the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200, which scores 11,228, the W4300 is 0.4% slower. The gap is small, but the WX 3200 is a newer professional card with a similar profile. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 scores 11,259, giving the W4300 a 0.6% deficit. Again, this is within noise. The largest delta is against the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M, where the W4300 leads by 1.6% (11,187 versus 11,012). Overall, the W4300’s performance is essentially tied with these mid-range GPUs from its generation, making it a dependable but not outstanding performer in its class.
Benchmark Performance
The only benchmark result available is the Geekbench OpenCL score of 11,187. This places the card at the 49th percentile, meaning it outperforms roughly half of all GPUs in the database. The deltas to its nearest rivals are all within 1.6%: it leads the GTX 870M by 0.1%, trails the WX 3200 by 0.4%, trails the GTX 760 by 0.6%, and leads the GTX 780M by 1.6%. These tight margins indicate that the W4300’s compute performance is very close to that of other mid-range GPUs from its era. The FP32 throughput of 1,428.5 GFLOPS, along with a texture rate of 44.64 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 14.88 GPixel/s, provides context for the OpenCL result. The memory bandwidth of 96.00 GB/s may be a limiting factor for memory-intensive kernels, especially given the 128-bit bus width and 4 GB capacity. The 768 shading units are organized in a GCN 2.0 configuration, which supports DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.2.170. The card’s 50 W TDP and lack of power connectors make it an energy-efficient option, but the low power draw also caps its peak performance. The 49th percentile ranking suggests that while the W4300 is not a high-end performer, it is by no means a bottom-tier card, and its compute capabilities are sufficient for many professional applications.
FAQ
Q: What is the memory configuration of the FirePro W4300?
A: It has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 96.00 GB/s and a memory clock of 1500 MHz (6 Gbps effective).
Q: Does the card support hardware ray tracing?
A: No. The FACT PACK lists no RT cores or tensor cores, so the W4300 does not include dedicated ray tracing or AI acceleration hardware.
Q: What APIs are supported?
A: It supports DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.2.170.
Q: What are the power requirements?
A: The TDP is 50 W, the suggested PSU is 250 W, and it requires no power connectors.
Q: What display outputs does it have?
A: It has 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 outputs.
Q: What is the production status?
A: It is end-of-life, with a release date of 2015-11-30.
Ray Tracing and Feature Set
The FirePro W4300 does not include RT cores or tensor cores, as indicated by the null fields in its specification. Therefore, it lacks hardware-accelerated ray tracing and tensor-based compute features. Its feature set is defined by the GCN 2.0 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.2.170. The card’s 768 shading units and 48 TMUs handle traditional rasterization and compute workloads. The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB GDDR5 at 96.00 GB/s. The pixel rate is 14.88 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 44.64 GTexel/s. For professional applications that rely on OpenCL, the card’s 1,428.5 GFLOPS FP32 performance is the primary metric. The lack of tensor cores means no dedicated AI inference or training acceleration. Similarly, the absence of RT cores means ray-traced scenes would be processed via compute shaders, which is inefficient. Thus, the W4300 is best suited for traditional 3D rendering, CAD, and general-purpose GPU compute that does not require specialized hardware. Its support for DirectX 12 and Vulkan ensures compatibility with modern graphics APIs, but the card’s modest compute power and lack of dedicated features limit its use in cutting-edge workloads.
Power and Cooling
The FirePro W4300 has a TDP of 50 W, which is exceptionally low for a workstation GPU. It requires no power connectors, drawing all power from the PCIe slot. The suggested power supply is 250 W, making it compatible with most office and workstation systems. The card occupies a single slot and has dimensions of 171 mm (6.7 inches) in length and 69 mm (2.7 inches) in height. The cooling solution is not specified, but the low TDP suggests a passive or small active cooler is sufficient. The 28 nm process from TSMC contributes to the low power draw. The card’s end-of-life status and 2015-11-30 release date indicate it is an older design, but its power efficiency remains a point in its favor. The absence of power connectors simplifies installation in systems with limited cable management, and the single-slot form factor allows for dense multi-GPU configurations, though the card’s performance may not justify such setups. The 250 W PSU recommendation is conservative, and most systems with a standard 300 W or higher power supply will easily accommodate this card. Overall, the W4300’s power and cooling characteristics make it an easy fit for a wide range of chassis.
The NVIDIA Equivalent of FirePro W4300
Looking for a similar graphics card from NVIDIA? The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 offers comparable performance and features in the NVIDIA lineup.
Popular AMD FirePro W4300 Comparisons
See how the FirePro W4300 stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare FirePro W4300 with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs