AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
AMD graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
AMDAMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200 GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
Pro WX 3200 Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the Radeon Pro WX 3200's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 by AMD dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
AMD's Radeon Pro WX 3200 Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The Radeon Pro WX 3200's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 by AMD Cache
On-chip cache hierarchy
On-chip cache provides ultra-fast data access for the Pro WX 3200, reducing the need to fetch data from slower VRAM. L1 and L2 caches store frequently accessed data close to the compute units. AMD's Infinity Cache (L3) dramatically increases effective bandwidth, improving GPU benchmark performance without requiring wider memory buses. Larger cache sizes help maintain high frame rates in memory-bound scenarios and reduce power consumption by minimizing VRAM accesses.
Pro WX 3200 Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
GCN 4.0 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 is built on AMD's GCN 4.0 architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the Pro WX 3200 will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
AMD's Radeon Pro WX 3200 Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the Radeon Pro WX 3200 to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 by AMD Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
AMD API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Product Information
Release and pricing details
The AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the Radeon Pro WX 3200 by AMD represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Benchmark Scores
geekbench_openclSource
Geekbench OpenCL tests GPU compute performance using the cross-platform OpenCL API. This shows how AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 handles parallel computing tasks like video encoding and scientific simulations.
Top 5 Performers
Top 5 PerformersNearby Performers
Nearby PerformersAbout AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
The AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a compact, professional-grade graphics card built on the Polaris 23 chip with GCN 4.0 architecture, targeting entry-level workstation tasks rather than high-end gaming or compute. With a 14 nm process from GlobalFoundries, 2,200 million transistors on a 103 mm² die, and a 4 GB GDDR5 memory configuration on a 128-bit bus delivering 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth, this card positions itself as a low-profile workhorse. Its single benchmark result—a Geekbench OpenCL score of 11,228—places it at the 49th percentile of all GPUs, signaling it is a middling performer that trades raw speed for power efficiency and professional feature support. The following analysis uses only the provided data to interpret what this card offers, who should consider it, and how it stacks against its closest rivals.
Who Should Consider It
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is not designed for gamers chasing high frame rates at demanding resolutions. Its 1.658 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 20.72 GPixel/s pixel rate are modest figures, and the 4 GB GDDR5 frame buffer with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture-heavy workloads. Benchmark results indicate this card is best suited for users running lightweight professional applications—CAD drafting, 2D design, or basic video encoding—where driver stability and display connectivity matter more than raw rasterization speed.
At 1080p resolution, the card can handle older or less demanding titles at reduced settings, but the data suggests it should not be considered for 1440p or 4K gaming. The 49th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it squarely in entry-level territory, meaning users who need to play modern AAA games will find the performance insufficient. Instead, consider this card if your primary needs are multi-monitor productivity, as it offers 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, which allow for a four-display setup without requiring additional adapters.
For professionals on a strict workflow that does not involve heavy 3D rendering or machine learning, the WX 3200’s 640 shading units and 32 texture mapping units provide adequate throughput for basic OpenCL-accelerated tasks. The card’s single-slot design and 167 mm length (6.6 inches) make it an excellent fit for small form factor workstations where space is constrained. If your software relies on OpenGL 4.6 or Vulkan 1.3, this card supports both, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of legacy and modern applications. However, if your workload demands high FP16 throughput, note that the FP16 rate matches FP32 at 1.658 TFLOPS (1:1), offering no advantage for half-precision compute.
Ray Tracing and Feature Set
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 has no dedicated ray tracing cores or tensor cores, as these are not listed in the architecture. This means hardware-accelerated ray tracing is entirely absent, and any ray-traced effects in supported applications would fall back to compute shaders, which would be prohibitively slow given the card’s modest FP32 performance. For users who require real-time ray tracing—whether in DXR-enabled games or professional visualization tools—this card is not a viable option.
The feature set focuses instead on API compatibility and display flexibility. It supports DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3, covering the major modern graphics APIs. The 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs are a standout feature, enabling high-resolution multi-monitor configurations with a single card. Memory is 4 GB of GDDR5 running at 1500 MHz (6 Gbps effective), which is sufficient for 1080p textures and moderate compute buffers but will bottleneck larger datasets. The lack of tensor cores also means no AI-accelerated features like DLSS or similar upscaling technologies, so image quality enhancements rely solely on the software stack.
Given the absence of RT and tensor hardware, the card’s value proposition rests on its professional driver support and low power draw. The 65 W TDP and lack of external power connectors mean it draws all power from the PCIe slot, making it an easy drop-in upgrade for pre-built systems with limited power delivery. The PCIe 3.0 x8 interface is another consideration; while it halves the lanes compared to x16, the bandwidth is adequate for this performance class, as the card’s data throughput does not saturate even the x8 link.
Benchmark Performance
The sole benchmark result—Geekbench OpenCL score of 11,228—provides a clear reference point for performance. Against its nearest rivals, the WX 3200 is essentially a peer, not a leader. It trails the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 by a negligible 0.3%, a difference of 31 points (11,228 vs. 11,259). This places the two cards within statistical noise, meaning real-world performance will be nearly identical in OpenCL workloads.
Against the AMD FirePro W4300, the WX 3200 leads by 0.4%, scoring 41 points higher (11,228 vs. 11,187). This is a marginal victory, indicating that AMD’s own professional lineup offers no generational leap in compute performance between these two entries. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M is 0.5% behind, with a score of 11,173, a gap of 55 points that is unlikely to be perceptible in any task. Finally, the WX 3200 holds a 2% lead over the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M, which scores 11,012—a 216-point difference that, while still small, is the largest margin among the listed rivals.
These deltas paint a picture of a card that is perfectly average for its segment. The 49th percentile ranking corroborates this, showing that half of all GPUs perform better and half worse. In practical terms, this means the WX 3200 will handle basic OpenCL acceleration—such as photo editing filters or spreadsheet calculations—without issue, but it will not accelerate heavy compute tasks like video rendering or scientific simulations. The texture rate of 41.44 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 20.72 GPixel/s are consistent with its score, reinforcing that this is a balanced but unremarkable performer.
Power and Cooling
Power consumption is a key strength of the Radeon Pro WX 3200. With a TDP of 65 W, it is an exceptionally efficient card, drawing minimal power under load. The suggested PSU is a modest 250 W unit, which means it can be paired with low-wattage power supplies commonly found in office desktops or small form factor systems. The card requires no external power connectors, drawing all its power from the PCIe slot, which simplifies installation and reduces cable clutter.
Cooling is handled by a single-slot design, which is adequate given the low heat output. The card’s dimensions—167 mm in length (6.6 inches) and 69 mm in height (2.7 inches)—allow it to fit in most chassis, including compact cases. The absence of a dedicated power connector also means there is no risk of overloading a weak PSU, making it a safe choice for upgrades in pre-built systems. The 14 nm process node from GlobalFoundries contributes to this efficiency, as it balances transistor density (21.4M per mm²) with thermal characteristics.
For builders, the practical implication is that this card can be installed in virtually any system with a PCIe x8 or x16 slot, regardless of PSU capacity. The 65 W TDP also means that system cooling requirements are minimal—a single case fan is likely sufficient to manage the added heat. However, the single-slot cooler may run louder under sustained load, as it has less surface area to dissipate heat compared to dual-slot designs. Overall, the power and cooling profile is ideal for quiet, low-power workstations where noise and energy draw are priorities.
How It Compares
vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760: The WX 3200 is effectively tied with this older NVIDIA card, trailing by just 0.3% in average score (11,228 vs. 11,259). The GTX 760 is a desktop gaming card from a previous generation, and the fact that a professional card matches it in OpenCL indicates that the WX 3200’s compute performance is not a regression. For professional use, the WX 3200 offers newer API support (Vulkan 1.3 vs. older) and more display outputs, but raw performance is indistinguishable.
vs. AMD FirePro W4300: The WX 3200 leads this AMD predecessor by 0.4% (11,228 vs. 11,187). The FirePro W4300 is a direct rival from AMD’s own professional lineup, and the small margin suggests that the WX 3200 is a modest incremental improvement, not a generational leap. Both cards share similar architectural roots, so the performance delta is minimal.
vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M: The WX 3200 is 0.5% ahead of this mobile GPU (11,228 vs. 11,173). The GTX 870M is a laptop part, so the comparison shows that the WX 3200 can match a mobile gaming GPU of its era. This reinforces that the card is suitable for light compute tasks but not for demanding workloads where a desktop gaming GPU would pull ahead.
vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M: The WX 3200 holds a 2% lead over this older mobile GPU (11,228 vs. 11,012). This is the largest margin among the rivals, but still modest in absolute terms. The GTX 780M is a high-end laptop GPU from an earlier generation, and the WX 3200’s advantage is likely due to its newer architecture and driver optimizations for professional software.
FAQ
Q: Does the Radeon Pro WX 3200 support hardware ray tracing?
A: No. The card has no dedicated ray tracing cores or tensor cores, so hardware-accelerated ray tracing is not supported.
Q: What is the maximum number of displays supported?
A: The card has 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, allowing for up to four displays connected directly without adapters.
Q: What is the power consumption and PSU requirement?
A: The TDP is 65 W, and the suggested PSU is 250 W. The card has no external power connectors, drawing all power from the PCIe slot.
Q: Which APIs are supported?
A: The card supports DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3.
Q: How does it perform in OpenCL benchmarks?
A: It scores 11,228 in Geekbench OpenCL, placing it at the 49th percentile of all GPUs, with performance nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 (0.3% behind).
Q: What is the memory configuration?
A: It has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus, running at 1500 MHz (6 Gbps effective), delivering 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth.
The NVIDIA Equivalent of Radeon Pro WX 3200
Looking for a similar graphics card from NVIDIA? The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER offers comparable performance and features in the NVIDIA lineup.
Popular AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Comparisons
See how the Radeon Pro WX 3200 stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare Radeon Pro WX 3200 with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs