Valorant

Valorant

AVERAGE FPS
414
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 414 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 307 322 338 460
1440p QHD 384 403 423 495
1080p Full HD 431 438 446 522

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 460
3840x2160 Medium 338
3840x2160 High 322
3840x2160 Ultra 307
2560x1440 Low 495
2560x1440 Medium 423
2560x1440 High 403
2560x1440 Ultra 384
1920x1080 Low 522
1920x1080 Medium 446
1920x1080 High 438
1920x1080 Ultra 431

Valorant with Intel Core i3-12100F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, In-Depth Analysis

Valorant is a competitive FPS where frame rate consistency often matters more than raw graphical fidelity, and the measured data for the Intel Core i3-12100F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 reflects a system built for extreme speed. At 1080p Low settings, this combination produces an average of 522 FPS, while even the most demanding preset tested, 4K Ultra, yields 307 FPS. The benchmark results across all twelve measured configurations show a setup that never drops below the triple-digit threshold, indicating that this pairing is exceptionally well-suited for high-refresh-rate monitors. The data suggests a system where the CPU and GPU work in concert to prioritize responsiveness, though the scaling patterns between resolutions and settings reveal distinct bottlenecks and optimization opportunities.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i3-12100F is a 4-core, 8-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. In the context of Valorant, which is known for relying heavily on single-thread performance, this processor's specifications are directly relevant to the high frame rates observed. The CPU's single-thread benchmark scores—893 in 3DMark single-thread, 1674 in Cinebench R23 single-core, and 3444 in Passmark single-thread—demonstrate strong per-core capability. This is critical because Valorant's game logic and rendering draw calls often bottleneck on a single core, and the data shows this CPU does not hold back the GPU at lower resolutions.

The processor's cache hierarchy also plays a role in game performance. With 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 12 MB L3 cache, the i3-12100F has enough fast memory to handle the frequent, small data transfers typical of a fast-paced shooter. The 58W TDP and 10 nm process node indicate efficient power delivery, which helps maintain boost clocks during extended gaming sessions. When compared to its nearest rivals in the CPU benchmark database, the i3-12100F's average benchmark score of 13494 places it within 0.3% of the Intel Core i5-9500 (13452) and 0.7% behind the Intel Core 5 120UL (13594). This performance parity with older mainstream chips suggests that the i3-12100F is not a weak link in this gaming configuration.

The benchmark results indicate that at 1080p and 1440p, the CPU is likely the primary driver of the high frame rates. At 1080p Low, the system hits 522 FPS, while at 1440p Low, it reaches 495 FPS, a drop of only 27 FPS. This relatively small decrease when resolution increases suggests the CPU is still feeding the GPU enough data to maintain near-maximum output. However, the data also shows a shift in balance at 4K, where the GPU begins to take on more responsibility. The 4K Low result of 460 FPS is 62 FPS lower than 1080p Low, indicating that while the CPU is still strong, the GPU's workload is increasing. The CPU's 68th percentile ranking among all tested CPUs, combined with its 4-core limit, means that in scenarios with many simultaneous actors or complex physics, it could become a limiting factor, but the measured FPS data does not show this occurring at the tested settings.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 brings 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The memory clock is listed as 1750 MHz, operating at an effective 28 Gbps. For Valorant, which is not a VRAM-intensive title, the 8 GB capacity is more than sufficient, and the high bandwidth ensures that texture streaming and asset loading never cause stutters. The GPU's base clock of 2280 MHz and boost clock of 2497 MHz are relatively high, which contributes to the excellent raw performance numbers seen in the benchmarks.

The RTX 5060's compute capabilities are substantial, with 3840 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The FP32 performance of 19.18 TFLOPS is a strong indicator of its ability to handle the geometry and shader work required by Valorant, even at high settings. The GPU's benchmark scores reinforce this: a Passmark G3D score of 20891 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3628 place it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival data shows it is within 0.3% of the AMD Radeon 860M (26401) and 0.8% behind the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (26553) in average benchmark score.

The measured FPS data reveals how the GPU's role changes with resolution. At 1080p, the GPU is not the bottleneck; the system achieves 522 FPS on Low and 431 FPS on Ultra. The difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 91 FPS, which is significant, but the absolute numbers remain extremely high. Moving to 1440p, the Ultra preset yields 384 FPS, while at 4K, Ultra drops to 307 FPS. This scaling shows that the GPU is increasingly taxed as pixel count rises, yet it never falls below a playable threshold. The data suggests that the RTX 5060 is overqualified for this game at 1080p, but it becomes the more dominant component at 4K, where the gap between Low and Ultra settings widens. Specifically, at 4K, the difference between Low (460 FPS) and Ultra (307 FPS) is 153 FPS, compared to a 91 FPS gap at 1080p, indicating the GPU's shader and memory subsystems are working harder at higher resolutions.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Analyzing the measured FPS rows, the choice of settings depends on whether the goal is maximum competitive responsiveness or visual fidelity. For players with a 360Hz monitor, the 1080p Medium preset, with an average of 446 FPS and a minimum of 379 FPS, provides a consistent experience that stays above the refresh rate, ensuring no dropped frames. The 1080p Low preset pushes to 522 FPS, which offers additional headroom but with reduced visual details that could make distant enemies harder to spot; however, in a game like Valorant, lower settings often reduce visual clutter. The 1080p High preset at 438 FPS and Ultra at 431 FPS are nearly identical, with a mere 7 FPS difference, suggesting that High is a better choice than Ultra for a marginal visual gain with slightly better performance.

At 1440p, the Medium preset delivers 423 FPS with a minimum of 359 FPS, which is still high enough for most high-refresh-rate displays. The Low preset at 495 FPS is the maximum performance option, but the Medium settings offer a better balance between smoothness and graphical quality, as the minimum frame rate of 359 FPS indicates a more stable experience than the Low preset's unrecorded minimum. For 4K gaming, the data shows that Ultra (307 FPS) and High (322 FPS) are both viable, but the Medium preset at 338 FPS with a minimum of 288 FPS provides the best combination of high average and acceptable lows. The 4K Low preset at 460 FPS is the fastest, but it may not be necessary given that even the Ultra preset remains above 300 FPS.

The best experience per the measured rows appears to be the 1080p Medium preset for competitive play, as it offers a high average frame rate (446 FPS) and a solid minimum (379 FPS), balancing responsiveness with enough visual detail to read the game state. For those who prioritize absolute performance, 1080p Low is the clear choice, but the difference between Low and Medium is only 76 FPS, which may not be perceptible on a 240Hz monitor. At higher resolutions, the Medium preset consistently shows the most stable minimum FPS values (288 at 4K, 359 at 1440p), making it the recommended setting for a smooth experience without sacrificing too much visual quality.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The Intel Core i3-12100F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination ranks 1519th out of 3708 tested combos in Valorant, placing it in the top 41% of all systems tested. This ranking is surprisingly modest given the extremely high absolute FPS numbers, which suggests that many other combinations—likely those with more powerful CPUs or GPUs—achieve even higher frame rates. The combo's position in the database indicates that while this pairing is very fast, it is not among the elite configurations for this game. The rank of 1519 out of 3708 means there are 1518 combos that perform better, likely featuring higher-end processors like Core i7 or i9 models or more powerful GPUs.

The data implies that the i3-12100F's 4-core limit may be the reason for this mid-pack ranking. In a game where frame rates can reach into the 700s or 800s with top-tier hardware, the i3-12100F's single-thread performance, while strong, is not the absolute best. The CPU's percentile of 68 means it is better than 68% of all CPUs, but not the top tier. Similarly, the RTX 5060's percentile of 72 indicates it is a strong GPU, but not the fastest available. The combination of two solid but not top-tier components results in a ranking that reflects their average performance level relative to the entire database.

This ranking suggests that for players seeking the absolute highest frame rates in Valorant, there are better options. However, the measured FPS data shows that this combo still delivers exceptional performance, with no configuration dropping below 288 FPS. The rank in the 41st percentile does not diminish the practical experience; it simply indicates that the database contains many systems with more headroom. The delta between this combo and the top-ranked systems is not quantifiable from the given data, but the FPS numbers suggest that the difference would only be noticeable on monitors with refresh rates above 500Hz, which are rare.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of scaling from 1080p to 4K, which helps identify which component is the primary limiter at each resolution. At Low settings, the system produces 522 FPS at 1080p, 495 FPS at 1440p, and 460 FPS at 4K. This represents a 12% drop from 1080p to 4K (62 FPS), which is relatively small, indicating that at Low settings, the CPU is still the dominant factor. The game's rendering at Low settings places minimal load on the GPU, so the frame rate is largely determined by the CPU's ability to process game logic and issue draw calls. The i3-12100F's strong single-thread performance keeps the frame rate high even as resolution increases.

At Medium settings, the pattern changes. The FPS drops from 446 at 1080p to 423 at 1440p (a 23 FPS decrease) and then to 338 at 4K (an 85 FPS decrease from 1440p). This accelerating decline suggests that the GPU begins to take on more responsibility at Medium settings, especially at 4K where the pixel count significantly increases the GPU's workload. The minimum FPS at Medium settings also shows this trend: 379 at 1080p, 359 at 1440p, and 288 at 4K. The 4K minimum of 288 FPS is the lowest recorded value across all tests, indicating that the GPU is becoming a bottleneck at this resolution and setting.

For High and Ultra settings, the scaling is more pronounced. At High settings, the FPS goes from 438 at 1080p to 403 at 1440p (a 35 FPS drop) and then to 322 at 4K (an 81 FPS drop). At Ultra, the numbers are 431 at 1080p, 384 at 1440p, and 307 at 4K. The percentage drops from 1080p to 4K are 26% for High (116 FPS) and 29% for Ultra (124 FPS). These larger drops indicate that at higher settings, the GPU is the limiting component, as its shading units and memory bandwidth are saturated by the increased visual complexity. The data clearly shows that the CPU is the main driver at Low settings, while the GPU becomes the bottleneck at higher settings and resolutions, particularly at 4K.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo in Valorant?

A: The highest average FPS is 522, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: Does this combo maintain above 300 FPS at 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes, the measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 307 FPS, with no minimum FPS recorded.

Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i3-12100F has an average benchmark score of 13494, which is 0.3% higher than the Intel Core i5-9500 (13452) and 1.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-1250U (13351).

Q: What is the lowest minimum FPS recorded across all tested settings?

A: The lowest minimum FPS is 288, recorded at 3840x2160 resolution with Medium settings.

Q: Is the RTX 5060's memory bandwidth sufficient for 4K gaming in Valorant?

A: The RTX 5060 has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, and the measured 4K FPS values (ranging from 307 to 460) indicate that this bandwidth is sufficient, as no performance dips below 288 FPS are observed.

Q: What is the combo's rank in the database for this game?

A: This combo ranks 1519th out of 3708 tested combos in Valorant, placing it in the 41st percentile of all tested systems.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its peak performance. Low settings produce an average of 522 FPS. Medium settings average 446 FPS, with a minimum of 379 FPS and a maximum of 512 FPS. High settings average 438 FPS, and Ultra settings average 431 FPS. The data shows that at 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 91 FPS, with the minimum FPS only recorded for Medium settings.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but show a slight decrease. Low settings average 495 FPS. Medium settings average 423 FPS, with a minimum of 359 FPS and a maximum of 486 FPS. High settings average 403 FPS, and Ultra settings average 384 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 111 FPS, indicating that the GPU is more heavily utilized at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes a more significant factor. Low settings average 460 FPS. Medium settings average 338 FPS, with a minimum of 288 FPS and a maximum of 389 FPS. High settings average 322 FPS, and Ultra settings average 307 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 153 FPS, the largest gap across all resolutions, confirming that the GPU is the limiting component at this resolution. The minimum FPS at 4K Medium (288) is the lowest recorded value in the entire dataset, while the maximum FPS at 4K Medium (389) is still well above typical refresh rates.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i3-12100F

Cores / Threads 4 / 8
Base Clock 3300 MHz
Boost Clock 4300 MHz
TDP 58W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

VRAM 8 GB GDDR7
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2497 MHz MHz
TDP 145 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i3-12100F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 in Valorant

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 460.0
3840x2160 Medium 338.0
3840x2160 High 322.0
3840x2160 Ultra 307.0
2560x1440 Low 495.0
2560x1440 Medium 423.0
2560x1440 High 403.0
2560x1440 Ultra 384.0
1920x1080 Low 522.0
1920x1080 Medium 446.0
1920x1080 High 438.0
1920x1080 Ultra 431.0

Valorant with ii3-12100F + Other GPUs

See how Valorant performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Valorant with RTX 5060 + Other CPUs

See how Valorant performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii3-12100F + RTX 5060

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.