Undisputed

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 paired with the Intel Arc B580 delivers a highly playable experience in Undisputed, but the data reveals a clear performance hierarchy that shifts dramatically based on resolution and quality settings. This combination lands in the 2117th position out of 2813 tested combos, placing it in the lower-mid tier of the database. The measured frames per second (FPS) tell a story of a system capable of high refresh rates at 1080p, but one that becomes increasingly constrained as pixel count rises, with the Ultra preset proving particularly demanding across all resolutions.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and consistent, indicating a system where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 221 at 1920x1080 to 160 at 2560x1440, a reduction of 61 frames, and then to 101 at 3840x2160, a further drop of 59 frames. This represents a 54% decrease in performance from 1080p to 4K at Low settings, a substantial penalty that points directly at the graphics card’s rendering limits.

The scaling pattern intensifies with higher quality presets. At High settings, performance drops from 132 FPS at 1080p to 95 FPS at 1440p, and finally to 60 FPS at 4K. The 4K High result is exactly half the 1080p High figure, showing a linear relationship between pixel count and frame rate. This linearity is a hallmark of a GPU-bound scenario; the CPU is clearly capable of feeding the GPU at lower resolutions, but the Arc B580’s shading units and memory bandwidth become the limiting factor as the rendering load grows.

At Medium settings, the 4K average of 73 FPS with a minimum of 62 and maximum of 84 shows the system is still playable, but the gap between 1440p (115 FPS) and 4K (73 FPS) is 42 frames, a 36% loss. The Ultra preset is the most punishing: 4K Ultra yields only 39 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay in a sports title. The trend across all settings suggests that 4K is only viable at Low or Medium presets, while 1440p offers a broader range of playable options.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B580 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture and features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is a critical factor in the 4K results, as higher resolutions demand more data throughput. The card’s base and boost clocks are both fixed at 2670 MHz, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). These clocks remain constant, meaning the performance deltas between settings are driven by the rendering workload rather than dynamic clock fluctuations.

The GPU’s 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units handle the pixel and texture processing. At 4K Ultra, the 39 FPS result indicates that the card is overwhelmed by the combination of high resolution and maximum quality effects. The 13.67 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 4K Ultra result shows the architectural limits of this mid-range silicon. The card’s percentile rank of 68 among all GPUs places it above average, yet the benchmark scores show it trading blows with older high-end cards like the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, which is just 0.6% ahead in average score.

The 12 GB VRAM is not the limiting factor in Undisputed, as even at 4K Ultra the memory capacity is likely sufficient. Instead, the data points to raw compute and memory bandwidth as the constraints. The 456.0 GB/s bandwidth is substantial, but the 192-bit bus width means the card must work harder to move data compared to wider-bus rivals. This explains why the FPS drops are so pronounced at 4K, where memory traffic increases exponentially.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and Intel Arc B580 ranks 2117th out of 2813 tested combos in Undisputed. This places it in the 75th percentile of all tested systems, meaning roughly a quarter of all combinations perform better. The rank reflects the GPU’s mid-tier standing more than the CPU’s capabilities, as the processor is a high-end part with a 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs.

The CPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 4464P, which is 0.3% faster, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F, which is 0.3% slower. These are all server or workstation-class processors, highlighting that the Ultra 7 265 is a powerful desktop chip that can easily keep pace with enterprise parts in raw compute. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (0.2% slower), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (0.6% faster), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (0.7% slower). This grouping shows the Arc B580 sits in a competitive band with previous-generation high-end cards, though its 4K performance in Undisputed suggests it may struggle more with modern titles.

The combo rank of 2117 indicates that while the CPU is overqualified for the GPU’s capabilities, the pair still delivers playable results in most scenarios. The rank is likely dragged down by the 4K Ultra score of 39 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target most gamers expect. At 1080p and 1440p, the combo would rank much higher, as the FPS figures are competitive with systems featuring more balanced pairings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 221 FPS, which is exceptionally high and indicates the CPU is not limiting at all. Medium preset at 1080p averages 159 FPS, with a minimum of 135 and maximum of 183, showing consistent frame delivery. High preset at 1080p averages 132 FPS, while Ultra drops to 85 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 136 FPS, a 62% reduction, demonstrating the massive impact of quality settings.

Moving to 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 160 FPS, which is still excellent for competitive play. Medium averages 115 FPS with a range of 98 to 132, while High averages 95 FPS. Ultra at 1440p yields 61 FPS, which is playable but on the edge of smoothness. The drop from Low to Ultra at 1440p is 99 FPS, a 62% reduction, mirroring the 1080p pattern. This consistency suggests the GPU is scaling linearly with the quality settings.

At 3840x2160, the picture changes dramatically. Low averages 101 FPS, which is still surprisingly high for 4K. Medium averages 73 FPS with a range of 62 to 84, while High drops to 60 FPS, exactly at the threshold for smooth play. Ultra at 4K averages just 39 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS minimum for most gamers. The 4K Low to Ultra gap is 62 FPS, a 61% reduction, but the absolute numbers are much lower, indicating the GPU is running out of headroom.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. This is a powerful CPU for gaming, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,216 and single-core score of 5,960. In Undisputed, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with frame data, and the numbers show it does this effortlessly at 1080p and 1440p.

At 1080p Low, the 221 FPS average is far above what the GPU can render at higher settings, proving the CPU is not a bottleneck. Even at 4K Low (101 FPS), the CPU is still likely ahead of the GPU’s capabilities. The CPU’s 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth provide ample data throughput for the game’s physics and AI calculations. The PassMark multi-thread score of 49,682 and single-thread score of 4,689 place it in the top tier of desktop processors.

The CPU’s 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs contrasts sharply with the GPU’s 68th percentile. This mismatch suggests that in future titles or at higher settings, the CPU would not be the limiting factor. The 20 cores and 20 threads are more than sufficient for Undisputed, which is a sports game that likely uses only a few threads. The high boost clock of 5.30 GHz ensures single-threaded performance is excellent, as shown by the Cinebench R15 single-core score of 600.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1920x1080, the High preset at 132 FPS offers the best balance of visual quality and performance, as it is well above the 60 FPS threshold and leaves headroom for dips. The Ultra preset at 85 FPS is also playable, but the 47 FPS drop from High to Ultra may not justify the visual gains. For competitive play, the Low preset at 221 FPS is excessive, and Medium at 159 FPS is a better choice for a mix of quality and speed.

At 2560x1440, the High preset at 95 FPS is the recommended choice, as it provides smooth gameplay with good visuals. Medium at 115 FPS is also viable if a higher frame rate is preferred, but the difference between Medium and High is only 20 FPS, making High the better value. The Ultra preset at 61 FPS is borderline; it hits the 60 FPS target but leaves no margin for error, so it is only recommended if visual fidelity is paramount. The Low preset at 160 FPS is overkill for most users.

At 3840x2160, the Medium preset at 73 FPS is the best option, as it comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS threshold while providing acceptable visuals. The High preset at 60 FPS is exactly at the limit, which means any demanding scene could cause dips below 60, so it is risky. The Low preset at 101 FPS is playable but sacrifices too much visual quality for a sports game. The Ultra preset at 39 FPS is not recommended, as it falls well below the playable threshold.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum average FPS achieved by this combo in Undisputed?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 221 at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This demonstrates the combo’s ability to handle high refresh rates at lower resolutions.

Q: Is this combo capable of 4K gaming in Undisputed?

A: Yes, but only at lower quality presets. At 4K Low, it averages 101 FPS, and at 4K Medium, it averages 73 FPS. The 4K High preset hits exactly 60 FPS, while 4K Ultra drops to 39 FPS, which is not smooth.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to all other tested combinations?

A: It ranks 2117th out of 2813 combos, placing it in the lower-middle of the database. The rank reflects the GPU’s mid-tier performance, as the CPU is in the top 7% of all processors.

Q: What is the difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, Low averages 160 FPS, while Ultra averages 61 FPS, a difference of 99 FPS. This shows the substantial performance cost of maximum quality settings.

Q: Which resolution and settings combo offers the smoothest experience above 100 FPS?

A: Several options exist: 1080p High (132 FPS), 1080p Medium (159 FPS), 1080p Low (221 FPS), 1440p Low (160 FPS), and 4K Low (101 FPS). The 1440p Low setting offers the best balance of resolution and speed.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck this GPU in Undisputed?

A: No, the data does not indicate a CPU bottleneck. The FPS scales consistently with resolution and settings, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. The CPU’s high single-thread performance ensures it can keep up with the GPU’s demands.