Undisputed

The Intel Core i5-14400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 delivers a remarkably consistent experience in Undisputed, with the data indicating that this combination is predominantly GPU-limited at higher resolutions. The measured frame rates show a clear hierarchy where the performance ceiling is defined by the graphics card, while the processor provides ample headroom to avoid becoming a bottleneck. This pairing ranks 491st out of 1580 tested combos in this title, placing it in the upper third of all configurations and suggesting a well-balanced setup for competitive play.

Resolution Scaling

The transition from 1080p to 4K reveals a predictable and steep performance curve, with the most significant drops occurring as pixel count increases. At Low settings, the average frame rate falls from 361.9 FPS at 1920x1080 to 258.8 FPS at 2560x1440, a drop of approximately 28%, and then further down to 166.8 FPS at 3840x2160, representing a cumulative decline of about 54% from the 1080p baseline. This scaling pattern is typical of a GPU-bound scenario where the rendering workload expands faster than the hardware can process it.

At Medium settings, the same trend is visible but with slightly different magnitudes. The 1080p result of 257.4 FPS drops to 188.2 FPS at 1440p, a 27% reduction, and then to 117.8 FPS at 4K, a total decline of 54% from 1080p. High settings show a similar trajectory: 213.8 FPS at 1080p, 154.9 FPS at 1440p (a 28% drop), and 98.5 FPS at 4K (a 54% total drop). The consistency of these percentage drops across settings strongly suggests that the RTX 3080 is the limiting component throughout, as the CPU's influence diminishes at higher resolutions.

Ultra settings amplify the scaling effect. The 1080p average of 135.7 FPS drops to 99.3 FPS at 1440p, a 27% reduction, and then to 66 FPS at 4K, a total decline of 51%. Interestingly, the relative drop from 1440p to 4K at Ultra is steeper than at lower settings, indicating that the most demanding preset pushes the GPU to its absolute limit. The data shows that 1440p at High or Medium offers the best balance of fluidity and visual fidelity, while 4K is only viable at Medium or lower settings if aiming for frame rates above 100 FPS.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080's specifications directly explain its behavior in Undisputed. With 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus, the card delivers a bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s, which is sufficient for the game's texture and geometry demands at 4K, though the Ultra preset's 66 FPS average suggests memory pressure begins to affect performance. The GPU's boost clock of 1710 MHz and base clock of 1440 MHz are typical for the Ampere architecture, and the 8704 shading units provide the raw compute power needed for high frame rates at lower resolutions.

The GPU's 80th percentile ranking among all GPUs and its average benchmark score of 35787 indicate it sits comfortably above the mid-range, but its nearest rivals show how close the competition is. The AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE scores 36101, just 0.9% higher, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scores 35435, 1% lower. This tight clustering means the RTX 3080's performance in Undisputed is not exceptional but rather typical for its class, with the measured FPS numbers reflecting a card that can handle 1440p effortlessly but struggles to maintain 4K at maximum settings.

The 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores are present but the game's sports genre does not appear to leverage ray tracing heavily, as the frame rate differences between settings are primarily driven by traditional rasterization load. The 10 GB VRAM capacity, while adequate for 1080p and 1440p, may be a limiting factor at 4K Ultra, where the 66 FPS average is the lowest recorded across all configurations. The card's 320 W TDP and 700 W suggested PSU are in line with its performance class, but the data suggests that for Undisputed, the GPU is the clear primary constraint.

FAQ

*Q: Can this combo run Undisputed at 4K with playable frame rates?*

A: Yes, but only at lower settings. The data shows 166.8 FPS at Low, 117.8 FPS at Medium, and 98.5 FPS at High for 3840x2160. Ultra drops to 66 FPS, which may be below the threshold for competitive play.

Q: What is the best resolution to use for high refresh rate monitors?

A: At 1920x1080, the combo delivers 213.8 FPS at High and 257.4 FPS at Medium, making it ideal for 240Hz displays. At 2560x1440, High produces 154.9 FPS, which suits 144Hz monitors.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this setup?

A: The benchmark results indicate the RTX 3080 is the limiting component. The consistent percentage drops in FPS when moving from 1080p to 4K across all settings (roughly 54% total) are characteristic of GPU-bound performance, not CPU limitations.

Q: How does the RTX 3080 compare to its nearest rivals in raw compute?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 35787. The AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE scores 36101 (0.9% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro Duo scores 35860 (0.2% higher), and the AMD Radeon 880M scores 35646 (0.4% lower). The RTX 3080 sits in the middle of this pack.

Q: Does the Ultra preset offer a meaningful visual upgrade over High?

A: The data does not measure visual quality, but the performance cost is significant. At 1440p, Ultra averages 99.3 FPS compared to High's 154.9 FPS, a 36% reduction. At 4K, Ultra drops to 66 FPS versus High's 98.5 FPS.

Q: What is the processor's relative standing among other CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F ranks in the 88th percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 32508. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-12800H, scores 32513, a 0% difference, showing the i5 is competitive with mobile i7 parts.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides clear guidance on which presets to use for different priorities. For players targeting the highest possible frame rates on a 1080p display, the Low preset delivers 361.9 FPS, which exceeds any current monitor's refresh rate and is only useful for extreme competitive scenarios. The Medium preset at 257.4 FPS is more practical, offering better visuals while still remaining well above the refresh rate of most 240Hz monitors. High at 213.8 FPS is the sweet spot for 1080p, as it provides a substantial visual boost over Medium with only a 17% performance penalty.

At 1440p, the recommendation shifts. High settings produce 154.9 FPS, which is excellent for 144Hz panels and represents the best balance of visual quality and performance. Medium at 188.2 FPS is the choice for players with 165Hz or 180Hz monitors who prioritize smoothness over graphical fidelity. Low at 258.8 FPS is unnecessary for most users, while Ultra at 99.3 FPS is only suitable for 60Hz displays or players who absolutely require maximum visual settings.

For 4K gaming, the options are more constrained. High at 98.5 FPS is playable on 60Hz displays but will not satisfy owners of 120Hz or 144Hz panels. Medium at 117.8 FPS is the best option for 4K120 displays, as it provides a significant improvement over High's 20% higher frame rate. Low at 166.8 FPS is viable for 4K144 panels, but the visual sacrifices are substantial. Ultra at 66 FPS is only recommended for cinematic, non-competitive play. Overall, the data suggests that High settings at 1440p is the most balanced configuration, offering near-optimal frame rates without compromising visual quality.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination of the Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 ranks 491st out of 1580 tested combos in Undisputed, placing it in the 69th percentile of all configurations. This is a strong showing, considering the CPU is a mid-range desktop part and the GPU is from the previous generation. The ranking indicates that this combo outperforms roughly two-thirds of tested systems, which is notable given that many of those combos likely feature newer, more expensive hardware.

The CPU's own ranking is 88th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at 80th percentile among all GPUs. The combo's overall rank of 491 is slightly lower than either component's individual percentile, suggesting that the pairing is balanced but not optimal. The nearest GPU rivals show the RTX 3080 is not the fastest in its class, but the i5-14400F's strong single-threaded performance (3093 in Cinebench R23 single-core) helps maintain high frame rates in this sports title, which likely benefits from responsive CPU input.

Compared to the full field of 1580 combos, this setup's 491st place is respectable but not elite. The top 500 threshold is generally reserved for systems with flagship CPUs and GPUs, so this combo's placement just inside that boundary reflects its ability to deliver high frame rates at mainstream resolutions. The data suggests that upgrading either component would improve the ranking, but the current configuration is already well above average for Undisputed.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest performance across all settings. The Low preset averages 361.9 FPS, which drops to 257.4 FPS at Medium, 213.8 FPS at High, and 135.7 FPS at Ultra. The gap between Low and Ultra is 226.2 FPS, representing a 62% reduction when maxing out settings. The Medium to High transition costs 43.6 FPS (17%), while High to Ultra costs 78.1 FPS (36%), showing that Ultra is significantly more demanding.

At 2560x1440, the averages are 258.8 FPS at Low, 188.2 FPS at Medium, 154.9 FPS at High, and 99.3 FPS at Ultra. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 159.5 FPS drop, or 62%, consistent with the 1080p pattern. The Medium to High step costs 33.3 FPS (18%), and High to Ultra costs 55.6 FPS (36%). These percentages mirror the 1080p results, reinforcing that the GPU is the primary constraint.

At 3840x2160, the averages are 166.8 FPS at Low, 117.8 FPS at Medium, 98.5 FPS at High, and 66 FPS at Ultra. The total drop from Low to Ultra is 100.8 FPS, or 60%. The Medium to High transition costs 19.3 FPS (16%), while High to Ultra costs 32.5 FPS (33%). Interestingly, the 4K Ultra result of 66 FPS is the only configuration that falls below the 60 FPS threshold typically considered the minimum for smooth gameplay, indicating that this setting is only viable for players who accept reduced frame rates in exchange for maximum visual fidelity. The data across all resolutions shows a consistent pattern: Medium settings offer the best frame rate per setting level, while High provides the best quality-to-performance ratio for most users.