Undisputed

The Intel Core i5-14400F and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT combination delivers a highly capable experience in Undisputed, with benchmark results showing that the optimal balance of visual fidelity and frame rate is found at the Medium preset across all tested resolutions. The data indicates that Medium provides a substantial performance uplift over High settings while maintaining a smooth and responsive feel, making it the recommended choice for most users.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data reveals a clear hierarchy of performance across the four available settings presets. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset achieves an average of 207 FPS, which is 35 FPS higher than the High preset’s 172 FPS. This 20% improvement at Medium comes with noticeably reduced visual demands, yet the frame rate remains far above the threshold for competitive play. The Low preset pushes performance even higher to 288 FPS, but this comes at the cost of visual quality that may diminish the game’s presentation.

The most telling comparison is between High and Ultra settings. At 1080p, the Ultra preset drops the average frame rate to 110 FPS, a 36% reduction from High. This significant penalty suggests that the Ultra preset introduces effects that heavily tax the GPU without a proportional visual benefit in a sports title where clarity and responsiveness matter most. The Medium preset at 1080p, with its 207 FPS average and a minimum of 176 FPS, offers the sweet spot where the GPU is not bottlenecked by excessive effects.

At 2560x1440, the same pattern holds. Medium produces 150 FPS average with a minimum of 127 FPS, which is comfortably playable on high-refresh monitors. High settings at this resolution yield 124 FPS, still smooth but with a 21% reduction from Medium. The Ultra preset at 1440p falls to 80 FPS, which may feel less fluid during fast-paced boxing exchanges. For 4K gameplay, the Medium preset at 3840x2160 delivers 95 FPS with a minimum of 81 FPS, making it the only high-fidelity setting that remains consistently above 60 FPS.

The data strongly supports Medium as the best experience per the measured rows. It provides the largest performance headroom over High while avoiding the steep drop-off seen at Ultra. The minimum FPS values for Medium, which are the only ones recorded in the dataset, also indicate greater stability—at 1080p the minimum of 176 FPS is 84% of the average, and at 1440p it is 85%, showing consistent frame pacing.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-14400F brings 10 cores and 16 threads to the system, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. This 10-core configuration is built on the Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process, and its benchmark results show strong multi-threaded capability. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 21,645 in multi-core and 3,055 in single-core, while Geekbench results show 11,268 multi-core and 2,058 single-core.

For a sports title like Undisputed, the CPU’s role is primarily in managing game logic, physics calculations for fighter movements, and AI behavior. The data suggests that the i5-14400F is more than sufficient for these tasks, as the frame rate scaling across resolutions indicates the GPU becomes the primary limiter at higher settings. The CPU’s 20 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel memory support contribute to low-latency data access, which is beneficial for maintaining consistent frame times.

The single-core performance of 3,055 in Cinebench R23 places it in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, indicating strong per-thread performance that is crucial for the main game thread. The multi-core score of 21,645 demonstrates that even when background tasks or additional game systems demand resources, the CPU has ample headroom. This is particularly relevant for Undisputed, where the simulation of multiple fighters and their interactions can create unpredictable processing loads.

The CPU’s 65 W TDP and lack of integrated graphics mean the system relies entirely on the discrete GPU for rendering. However, the benchmark data shows that at Low settings, even at 4K, the CPU can push 132 FPS, suggesting that the i5-14400F is not a bottleneck in any tested configuration. The processor’s performance relative to its nearest rivals shows it is well-matched to the GPU, with a 0.1% delta over the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and a 0.5% delta over the Intel Core i7-12800H in aggregate CPU benchmarks.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is the dominant component in this combination, and its characteristics directly shape the measured results. The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its boost clock of 2600 MHz and game clock of 2495 MHz are supported by 2560 shading units and 64 ROPs, which handle the rasterization demands of the game’s fighter models and arena environments.

The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM capacity is a critical factor at high resolutions. The data shows that at 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 50, suggesting that the memory bandwidth or capacity may be strained by the highest-quality textures and effects. At 4K Medium, the average improves to 95 FPS, indicating that the Medium preset reduces VRAM pressure enough to allow the GPU’s compute units to operate more efficiently.

The RX 6750 XT’s performance percentile of 71 among all GPUs places it in a solid mid-to-high tier, and its benchmark scores reflect this positioning. The PassMark G3D score of 20,700 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,548 show that the GPU handles DirectX 12 workloads effectively, which is relevant for a modern title like Undisputed. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 98,089 indicates strong API-level performance for the game’s rendering pipeline.

The GPU’s 250 W TDP and PCIe 4.0 x16 interface are standard for this class, and the measured FPS data shows that the GPU is the limiting factor at High and Ultra settings across all resolutions. At 1080p Low, the GPU achieves 288 FPS, which is likely near its maximum output for this game. As resolution increases, the FPS drops proportionally, confirming that the RX 6750 XT’s compute and memory resources are fully utilized. The GPU’s nearest rival comparisons, such as a 1.1% delta over the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, provide context for its performance tier.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-14400F and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT achieves a combo rank of 1,710 out of 3,718 tested combinations in Undisputed. This places the pairing in the 46th percentile of all combos, meaning it outperforms a slight majority of systems tested while remaining behind the top tier of hardware configurations. This ranking is notable given the CPU’s 83rd percentile standing and the GPU’s 71st percentile, suggesting that the game’s workload does not perfectly align with the strengths of either component.

The rank indicates that while this combo is capable, there are many systems that achieve higher frame rates, likely due to more powerful GPUs. The data shows that the combo’s performance is heavily GPU-bound at higher settings, so combos with faster graphics cards would naturally rank higher. However, the i5-14400F’s strong single-core performance ensures that the CPU does not drag the combo down, as evidenced by the consistent FPS scaling from Low to High settings.

Compared to the CPU’s nearest rivals, the combo’s performance aligns with expectations. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, which scores 0.1% higher in aggregate CPU benchmarks, would likely produce similar results when paired with the same GPU. The GPU’s nearest rival, the R9 M395X at a 0.5% delta, is a much older part, indicating that the RX 6750 XT is positioned well above its immediate benchmark competitors. The combo rank of 1,710 out of 3,718 suggests that users with this setup can expect a solid experience, but those seeking the highest frame rates at 4K Ultra may need to consider more powerful GPUs.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data provides clear insights into how this combo scales across resolutions. From 1080p to 1440p at Medium settings, the average FPS drops from 207 to 150, a 27.5% reduction. From 1440p to 4K at Medium, the average drops from 150 to 95, a 36.7% reduction. This increasing rate of decline as resolution rises indicates that the GPU is becoming progressively more stressed, which is typical for a mid-to-high tier graphics card.

At High settings, the scaling is more gradual: 172 FPS at 1080p, 124 FPS at 1440p (a 27.9% drop), and 78 FPS at 4K (a 37.1% drop from 1440p). The similar percentage drops between Medium and High suggest that the GPU’s memory bandwidth is the limiting factor rather than raw compute, as the workload increases uniformly with pixel count. At Low settings, the scale is 288 FPS at 1080p, 208 FPS at 1440p (a 27.8% drop), and 132 FPS at 4K (a 36.5% drop), showing that even at minimal graphical load, the pixel throughput becomes the constraint.

The 4K Ultra result of 50 FPS is the most telling data point. This represents a 54.5% drop from 4K High’s 78 FPS, which is far steeper than the 36-37% drops seen when moving between resolutions. This suggests that the Ultra preset introduces effects that disproportionately impact the GPU, likely related to texture filtering or shadow quality that exceed the 12 GB VRAM’s capacity at 4K. The data indicates that the CPU is not a limiting factor at any resolution, as even the lowest FPS at 4K Ultra (50) is well above what would be expected if the i5-14400F were the bottleneck.

FAQ

Q: What is the best settings preset for this combo at 1080p?

A: The Medium preset provides the best balance, with an average of 207 FPS and a minimum of 176 FPS. This is 35 FPS higher than High’s 172 FPS average and 97 FPS higher than Ultra’s 110 FPS average, making it the most responsive option without sacrificing too much visual quality.

*Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Undisputed?*

A: Yes, but with caveats. At 4K Medium, the combo achieves 95 FPS average with a minimum of 81 FPS, which is playable. At 4K High, it drops to 78 FPS average, and at 4K Ultra, it falls to 50 FPS average, which may be too low for smooth gameplay.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this configuration?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor at all settings above Low. Evidence includes the 36-37% FPS drops when moving from 1440p to 4K, regardless of settings, which indicates pixel throughput limitations. The CPU is capable of pushing 288 FPS at 1080p Low, showing it is not the bottleneck.

Q: How does the RX 6750 XT compare to its nearest rival in benchmarks?

A: The RX 6750 XT scores 26,011 in average benchmark score, which is 0.5% higher than the AMD Radeon R9 M395X and 1.1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile. This places it in the 71st percentile of all GPUs.

Q: What is the CPU’s performance percentile and what does it mean?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F is in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32,279. This is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and 0.5% higher than the Intel Core i7-12800H, indicating strong mid-range performance.

Q: How does the combo rank among all tested systems?

A: The combo ranks 1,710 out of 3,718 tested combinations in Undisputed, placing it in the 46th percentile. This means it outperforms about 54% of all tested combos, which is a solid result for this CPU-GPU pairing.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following data represents the exact measured FPS values for the Intel Core i5-14400F and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT combination in Undisputed.

At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves an average of 288 FPS. The Medium preset produces an average of 207 FPS, with a minimum of 176 FPS and a maximum of 238 FPS. The High preset yields an average of 172 FPS. The Ultra preset results in an average of 110 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset achieves an average of 208 FPS. The Medium preset produces an average of 150 FPS, with a minimum of 127 FPS and a maximum of 172 FPS. The High preset yields an average of 124 FPS. The Ultra preset results in an average of 80 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset achieves an average of 132 FPS. The Medium preset produces an average of 95 FPS, with a minimum of 81 FPS and a maximum of 109 FPS. The High preset yields an average of 78 FPS. The Ultra preset results in an average of 50 FPS.

These numbers show a consistent pattern: the Medium preset always offers a significant advantage over High, while the Ultra preset incurs a disproportionate penalty. The minimum FPS values for Medium at all resolutions remain above 80, ensuring a stable experience even during intense gameplay moments. The data confirms that this combo is best utilized with Medium settings to maximize frame rate while maintaining reasonable visual quality.