Undisputed

# Undisputed with Intel Core i5-13400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 produces a capable 1080p and 1440p setup for Undisputed, with 4K playable only at lower presets. Benchmark data shows this combination ranks 770th out of 1580 tested combos, placing it in the middle of the database. The measured frame rates reveal a clear pattern: the RTX 5060's 8 GB of GDDR7 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth handle the boxing title's demands, while the i5-13400F's 10 cores and 16 threads provide sufficient CPU headroom across all tested settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Undisputed?

A: 1920x1080 delivers the strongest results, with average FPS ranging from 110.3 at Ultra to 287.2 at Low. At 2560x1440, averages stay above 80 FPS across all presets, while 3840x2160 drops to 48.7 FPS at Ultra.

Q: How does the RTX 5060 compare to its nearest GPU rival?

A: The RTX 5060 has an average benchmark score of 30109, which is essentially tied with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT at 30097 (0% delta). It sits slightly behind the AMD Radeon RX 570 at 30158 (-0.2% delta) and ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla M60 at 29969 (0.5% delta).

Q: What is the CPU's position relative to similar processors?

A: The i5-13400F has an average benchmark score of 25236, placing it 82nd percentile among all CPUs. Its closest rival is the Intel Core i7-13620H at 25201 (0.1% delta), while the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D scores 25365 (-0.5% delta).

Q: Which settings preset provides the best balance at 1440p?

A: High settings at 2560x1440 produce 123.7 average FPS, which is 43.0 FPS more than Ultra's 80.7 average. Medium sits at 148.2 FPS, so High offers a solid middle ground between visual quality and performance.

Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware?

A: At 3840x2160, only Low (133.6 FPS) and Medium (96.6 FPS) exceed 60 FPS. High manages 78.8 FPS, but Ultra drops to 48.7 FPS, making high-refresh 4K impractical at maximum settings.

Q: How does the combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: This pairing ranks 770th out of 1580 total combos in Undisputed, placing it near the median of the database's tested hardware combinations.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060's specifications directly shape Undisputed's frame rates. With 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, the card delivers 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth—a figure that proves adequate for the game's needs at 1080p and 1440p, but becomes a limiting factor at 4K Ultra. The GPU's boost clock of 2497 MHz and base clock of 2280 MHz drive its 3840 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output pipelines. These compute resources translate into a 19.18 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, which the benchmark results show is sufficient for smooth gameplay at most settings.

The RTX 5060's 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores contribute to its overall capability, though Undisputed's sports-focused rendering does not heavily stress ray tracing workloads. The card's performance percentile of 73rd among all GPUs places it solidly in the mid-to-upper tier. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, scores 30097 versus the RTX 5060's 30109, a negligible 0% delta that shows these cards perform nearly identically in synthetic benchmarks. The measured FPS data reinforces this: at 1920x1080 High, the combo achieves 173.3 FPS, while at 2560x1440 High it reaches 123.7 FPS.

The 8 GB VRAM capacity interacts with resolution scaling in a predictable manner. At 1080p, even Ultra settings (110.3 FPS) stay well within memory limits. Moving to 1440p, Ultra (80.7 FPS) still performs respectably. At 3840x2160, however, the combination of higher memory pressure and pixel throughput demands causes Ultra to fall to 48.7 FPS. The GPU's PCIe 5.0 x8 interface and 145 W TDP indicate a power-efficient design that pairs well with the 65 W TDP CPU.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-13400F provides the processing foundation for this combo. Its 10 cores (6 performance and 4 efficiency cores) and 16 threads operate at a 2.50 GHz base clock, boosting up to 4.60 GHz. The 20 MB shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB L2 per core help maintain responsive frame pacing in Undisputed's simulation-heavy boxing matches. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking among all processors reflects its strong multi-threaded capability, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21279 and single-core score of 3004.

The CPU's benchmark results show a clear scaling pattern: PassMark multithread scores 25032, while single-thread scores 3634. This disparity indicates the i5-13400F excels at parallel workloads, which matters for Undisputed's AI opponent logic and physics calculations. However, the game's frame rates at lower resolutions suggest the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck. At 1920x1080 Low, the combo hits 287.2 FPS, a figure that approaches the practical limits of many displays and indicates the CPU can feed the RTX 5060 effectively.

Comparatively, the i5-13400F's average score of 25236 nearly matches the Intel Core i7-13620H (25201, 0.1% delta) and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (25365, -0.5% delta). The 65 W TDP and Intel Socket 1700 compatibility make it a mainstream choice, while DDR4 and DDR5 memory support offers flexibility. The CPU's 10 nm process node and Raptor Lake architecture contribute to its efficiency, though the game's measured results show that CPU-bound scenarios are rare at this performance level.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides clear guidance for optimal settings. At 1920x1080, all presets exceed 110 FPS, making Ultra the recommended choice for users with high-refresh monitors—110.3 FPS average still offers smooth gameplay. For 2560x1440, High settings at 123.7 FPS strike the best balance between visual fidelity and performance, as Medium (148.2 FPS) and Low (208.7 FPS) sacrifice detail for marginal gains. Ultra at 80.7 FPS remains playable but shows a 43.0 FPS drop from High.

At 3840x2160, the situation changes dramatically. Medium (96.6 FPS) provides the best experience for 4K users, offering a 47.9 FPS improvement over Ultra (48.7 FPS) while maintaining acceptable image quality. High (78.8 FPS) is also viable, but Low (133.6 FPS) becomes necessary for competitive play at 4K. The data suggests that High is the sweet spot for 1440p, while Medium serves as the practical ceiling for 4K.

The 23.3% performance reduction from High to Ultra at 1080p (173.3 to 110.3 FPS) indicates diminishing returns at the highest preset. Conversely, the jump from Low to Medium at 1440p (208.7 to 148.2 FPS) represents a 60.5 FPS cost for improved visuals, which many users will find acceptable. For users prioritizing frame rate, Low at 1440p (208.7 FPS) or 1080p (287.2 FPS) delivers maximum responsiveness.

How This Combo Ranks

This configuration ranks 770th out of 1580 tested combos in Undisputed, placing it almost exactly at the median of the database. This mid-pack positioning reflects the balance between the i5-13400F's strong CPU performance (82nd percentile) and the RTX 5060's solid but not top-tier GPU capability (73rd percentile). The combination performs better than its raw rank might suggest in practical gaming, as Undisputed's requirements align well with this hardware's strengths.

The CPU's nearest rivals demonstrate comparable performance: the Intel Core i7-13620H (0.1% delta) and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (-0.5% delta) both sit within a fraction of a percent of the i5-13400F's average score. Similarly, the GPU's closest competitor, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, matches the RTX 5060's score exactly (0% delta). This suggests that the combo's rank is driven more by the overall hardware landscape than by any single component weakness.

In the context of all tested combinations, this rank of 770 out of 1580 means roughly half of all configurations perform better and half perform worse. The measured FPS data supports this assessment: the combo delivers playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p across all settings, but struggles at 4K Ultra. This makes it a versatile mid-range option rather than a high-end enthusiast setup.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers exceptional performance across all presets. Low settings produce 287.2 FPS average, Medium reaches 208.7 FPS, High achieves 173.3 FPS, and Ultra still maintains 110.3 FPS. These figures indicate that 1080p gaming is never constrained by this hardware, even at maximum settings.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains strong but shows expected scaling. Low settings yield 208.7 FPS, Medium delivers 148.2 FPS, High produces 123.7 FPS, and Ultra drops to 80.7 FPS. The transition from High to Ultra at this resolution represents the largest percentage drop (34.8%), suggesting that the Ultra preset imposes significant rendering costs.

At 3840x2160, the results become more varied. Low settings achieve 133.6 FPS, Medium maintains 96.6 FPS, High reaches 78.8 FPS, and Ultra falls to 48.7 FPS. The gap between Medium and Ultra at 4K (47.9 FPS) is substantial, while the jump from Low to Medium (37.0 FPS) is also notable. These numbers confirm that 4K gaming requires careful preset selection, with Medium representing the highest playable setting for most users. The data shows no min or max FPS values reported, so the analysis relies solely on average frame rates across these twelve measured configurations.