Undisputed

Undisputed

AVERAGE FPS
134
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 134 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 48 75 90 125
1440p QHD 76 118 143 198
1080p Full HD 105 163 197 274

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 125
3840x2160 Medium 90
3840x2160 High 75
3840x2160 Ultra 48
2560x1440 Low 198
2560x1440 Medium 143
2560x1440 High 118
2560x1440 Ultra 76
1920x1080 Low 274
1920x1080 Medium 197
1920x1080 High 163
1920x1080 Ultra 105

Undisputed with Intel Core i5-13400F + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT delivers a robust experience in Undisputed, but the benchmark data reveals a system that transitions from being CPU-limited at lower resolutions to firmly GPU-limited at 4K. The measured frame rates show a wide performance envelope, from a highly playable 75 FPS at 4K High to a blistering 274 FPS at 1080p Low, indicating that this combination has significant headroom depending on the user's display and quality preferences. The combo's overall rank of 1951 out of 3718 tested configurations places it in the upper half of all systems tested, suggesting a balanced mid-range pairing that prioritizes high refresh rates at 1440p over maximum visual fidelity at 4K.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling across resolutions tells a clear story about where the bottleneck lies in this system. Moving from 1080p to 1440p and then to 4K at the same settings shows a consistent and predictable drop in performance that is characteristic of a GPU-bound workload. At High settings, the average FPS falls from 163 at 1080p to 118 at 1440p, a reduction of 45 FPS, and then further down to 75 at 4K, another drop of 43 FPS. This linear decline indicates that the Radeon RX 6700 XT's rendering throughput is the primary constraint as pixel count increases.

The scaling pattern at Low settings is even more revealing. The system achieves 274 FPS at 1080p, which drops to 198 FPS at 1440p and then to 125 FPS at 4K. The fact that the 1080p Low result is so high suggests that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with data at a very rapid rate, and the game engine is not heavily limited by the i5-13400F's processing power in this scenario. The substantial drop from 274 to 198 FPS when moving to 1440p indicates that the GPU is starting to work harder, but the 198 FPS figure still suggests significant headroom remains.

The Ultra settings results show the most dramatic scaling, with 105 FPS at 1080p dropping to 76 FPS at 1440p and then plummeting to 48 FPS at 4K. This steep decline suggests that the Ultra preset introduces effects that are particularly taxing on the GPU's compute and memory resources. The 48 FPS average at 4K Ultra is the only result that falls below the 60 FPS threshold, indicating that this combination is not suited for maximum settings at 4K. The data implies that users with 4K displays will need to favor Medium or High settings to maintain fluent gameplay, while 1080p and 1440p users have the luxury of high refresh rates with most presets.

FAQ

*Q: What is the highest average frame rate this combo achieves in Undisputed?*

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 274 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

*Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Undisputed?*

A: Yes, but with caveats. At 4K with High settings, it produces an average of 75 FPS, and with Medium settings, it averages 90 FPS. However, at Ultra settings, the average drops to 48 FPS, which is below the typical 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400F's average benchmark score of 25292 is nearly identical to its closest rivals. It is 0.3% faster than the Intel Core 5 120 and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D, and 0.4% faster than the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, while being virtually tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and how might it affect 4K performance?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. This bandwidth is sufficient for the 75 FPS average seen at 4K High, but the significant drop at 4K Ultra suggests that the memory subsystem or compute units are saturated by the more demanding preset.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1080p?

A: At 1080p with Low settings, the system produces 274 FPS, which is exceptionally high. This indicates that the CPU is not a bottleneck at this resolution and settings level, as the GPU is still able to keep up with the processor's output. The i5-13400F's 10 cores and 16 threads are evidently sufficient for the game's physics and AI calculations at this frame rate.

Q: What is the combo's ranking among all tested systems?

A: The combination of the Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT ranks 1951 out of 3718 tested combos in Undisputed, placing it in the 52nd percentile of all configurations.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-13400F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. It shares a 20 MB L3 cache and supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. Its benchmark results show a strong multi-threaded capability, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22604 and a single-core score of 3191. This processing power is essential for a sports simulation like Undisputed, which must track multiple fighters, their animations, and physics interactions simultaneously.

The data suggests that the CPU is not a limiting factor at lower resolutions and settings. The 274 FPS result at 1080p Low is a clear indicator that the i5-13400F can feed the GPU with more than enough frames for high-refresh-rate monitors. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7314 and the max-thread score of 7307 are nearly identical, suggesting that the processor scales well up to its full thread count but does not show diminishing returns beyond that. This is typical for a game that may not be perfectly optimized for multi-threading.

However, the CPU's influence becomes less clear at higher resolutions. The consistent FPS drops when moving from 1080p to 1440p and 4K indicate that the GPU is taking over as the primary performance limiter. The fact that the 1080p High result (163 FPS) is lower than the 1440p Low result (198 FPS) shows that the game's settings menu has a more significant impact on performance than resolution alone, up to a point. The CPU's 65 W TDP and 10 nm process node indicate it is a power-efficient part, but the performance data shows it is more than capable of keeping up with the RX 6700 XT in this title.

The processor's percentile ranking of 77 against all CPUs, alongside its nearest rivals like the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS and Ryzen 5 5600X3D, places it squarely in the mid-to-high tier of desktop processors. The benchmark scores show a balanced profile, with a Passmark single-thread score of 3634 and a multithread score of 25032. This balance is what allows the system to deliver high frame rates in Undisputed, as the game does not appear to be disproportionately dependent on either single-core or multi-core performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates its peak performance capabilities. With Low settings, it achieves an average of 274 FPS, which is by far the highest result in the dataset. The Medium preset delivers 197 FPS with a minimum of 168 and a maximum of 227 FPS, showing a tight frame time distribution. High settings produce 163 FPS on average, while the Ultra preset, which likely enables more advanced shadow and texture filtering, brings the average down to 105 FPS. These results indicate that 1080p users can choose any preset and still enjoy a smooth experience, with even the heaviest settings staying well above the 100 FPS mark.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but show the expected cost of additional pixels. Low settings yield an average of 198 FPS, which is still exceptionally fast for a 1440p resolution. Medium settings drop to 143 FPS, with a minimum of 121 FPS, ensuring that even the most intense fight sequences will not cause noticeable stuttering. High settings average 118 FPS, while Ultra settings fall to 76 FPS. This data suggests that 1440p is the sweet spot for this combination, as it offers a 76-198 FPS range depending on the user's preference for visual quality or speed.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly under maximum load. Low settings produce an average of 125 FPS, which is surprisingly high for a 4K resolution and indicates that the RX 6700 XT has substantial raw power. Medium settings average 90 FPS, with a minimum of 77 FPS and a maximum of 104 FPS, which remains playable but shows the system is working harder. High settings drop to 75 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 48 FPS, which is the only result that would be considered unplayable for a fast-paced sports title. The 4K data shows a clear hierarchy where the Ultra preset is the only one that pushes the system past its limits.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT combination ranks 1951 out of 3718 tested systems in Undisputed, placing it in the upper half of all configurations. This rank of 1951 suggests that while the pairing is competent, there are many other combos that deliver higher performance in this specific game. The position in the middle of the pack implies that the system offers a solid, but not exceptional, experience compared to the full spectrum of hardware tested.

The GPU's individual performance, with an average benchmark score of 27425 and a percentile rank of 72 against all GPUs, is a strong contributor to this overall rank. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile, which is essentially tied, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, which is only 0.5% faster. This suggests that the RX 6700 XT provides desktop-class performance that can rival higher-tier cards in certain workloads. The CPU's percentile rank of 77 is slightly higher than the GPU's, indicating that the processor is a slightly stronger component in this pairing.

The fact that the combo ranks 1951 out of 3718 implies that the system is bettered by a significant number of configurations, likely those featuring more powerful GPUs or CPUs. However, the measured FPS data shows that the system is far from a slouch, especially at 1080p and 1440p. The rank should be interpreted as a measure of peak potential, where systems with faster components will achieve higher average frame rates, particularly at 4K Ultra settings where this combo struggles. For a user with a 1440p monitor, the experience will feel much more competitive than the raw rank might suggest.

Settings Recommendations

For users with a 1920x1080 display, the benchmark data supports using the Ultra preset, as it delivers an average of 105 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS target and provides the best visual quality without sacrificing smoothness. If a user has a 144Hz or higher refresh rate monitor, the High preset at 163 FPS or even Medium at 197 FPS would be preferable to maximize the display's potential, as the differences between Medium, High, and Ultra at 1080p are significant in terms of frame rate but may not be as visually apparent in a fast-moving sports game.

For 2560x1440 users, the High preset at 118 FPS offers an excellent balance between visual fidelity and performance. The Medium preset at 143 FPS is also a strong choice if a higher refresh rate is the priority. The Ultra preset at 76 FPS is still playable, but the 42 FPS drop from High to Ultra suggests that the visual improvements may not justify the performance cost. The Low preset at 198 FPS is overkill for most displays and should only be considered for competitive play where every frame matters.

For 3840x2160 users, the Medium preset at 90 FPS is the recommended starting point, as it provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS with a minimum of 77 FPS. The High preset at 75 FPS is also viable, but the Low preset at 125 FPS is the best choice for users who prioritize frame rate over all else. The Ultra preset at 48 FPS should be avoided, as it falls below the acceptable threshold for smooth gameplay in a sports title where timing and reaction are critical. The data suggests a clear trade-off between resolution and settings, with 4K users needing to compromise on quality to maintain performance.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is a RDNA 2.0 architecture GPU built on a 7 nm process at TSMC, featuring 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. It operates at a base clock of 2321 MHz with a boost clock of 2581 MHz, and its 12 GB of GDDR6 memory runs at an effective speed of 16 Gbps over a 192-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. The GPU's FP32 performance is rated at 13.21 TFLOPS, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is a key feature for modern game engines.

The benchmark data shows that the GPU is the primary driver of performance differences between settings. The measured FPS at 4K Ultra is 48, which is less than half of the 1080p Ultra result of 105 FPS. This 57 FPS drop is a direct consequence of the increased pixel workload, and the GPU's compute units and memory bandwidth are the limiting factors. The GPU's average benchmark score of 27425 places it at the 72nd percentile, and its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, is only 0.5% faster in average score, indicating that the RX 6700 XT punches above its weight class in synthetic tests.

The GPU's memory configuration is particularly relevant to the 4K results. The 384.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for the Medium preset, which achieves 90 FPS, but the 48 FPS at Ultra suggests that the game's high-resolution textures and effects require more bandwidth than the GPU can provide. The 12 GB VRAM capacity is not likely to be a limiting factor at 1080p or 1440p, but at 4K with Ultra settings, it may be approaching its limit. The GPU's 230 W TDP and dual-slot design indicate it is a power-hungry component, but the performance data justifies the power draw for the frame rates it delivers at lower resolutions.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i5-13400F

Cores / Threads 10 / 16
Base Clock 2500 MHz
Boost Clock 4600 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2581 MHz MHz
TDP 230 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i5-13400F + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT in Undisputed

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 125.0
3840x2160 Medium 90.0
3840x2160 High 75.0
3840x2160 Ultra 48.0
2560x1440 Low 198.0
2560x1440 Medium 143.0
2560x1440 High 118.0
2560x1440 Ultra 76.0
1920x1080 Low 274.0
1920x1080 Medium 197.0
1920x1080 High 163.0
1920x1080 Ultra 105.0

Undisputed with ii5-13400F + Other GPUs

See how Undisputed performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Undisputed with RX 6700 XT + Other CPUs

See how Undisputed performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii5-13400F + RX 6700 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.